It's 2012... Am I seriously seeing the same fricken debunked "evidence" being trotted around, while STILL refusing to acknowledge that 2 fully fueled passenger jets crashed into and exploded inside the buildings, unlike all these fires used for comparison?
Rob... unfortunately, yes, some still believe in some of these original rumors and speculation. I, for one, am not a believer in those rumors that the government planned it, and it wasn't aircraft that hit the towers.
I have looked at 9/11 extensively through the years, and filed quite a few FOIA requests. I can definitively say, in my summation anyway, that:
a) The cover-up, if any, is in relation to the MASSIVE intelligence failure that stretched across multiple agencies. No one person is responsible for the failure... we just got hit/blindsided. Plain and simple.
b) It is feasible that United 93 was shot down by U.S. Fighter Jets, and that President Bush was not made aware of it. He, himself, has admitted he gave the order... but the "heroic passengers" brought it down before they got there. Although that sounds great, I believe if the fighters did get there, the President would be left in the dark.
I truly am a believer in "plausible deniability" and believe the President is left in the dark on many issues. United 93 would definitely be one of them, if, in fact, it was brought down by us.
Some of the other theories and conjecture is just ridiculous... IMHO.