[ Facebook comments] - NEW! Don't have a FREE Black Vault account? You can still comment using your Facebook, AOL, Hotmail or Yahoo! accounts at the bottom of the page.
Throughout time, there have been countless government and political conspiracies that have kept us wondering. This forum is dedicated to that very topic. Got a conspiracy theory of your own? Post it, and try to back it up as best you can!
magonia17 wrote:It seems an agenda is being followed here and a lot of manipulation for political purposes. There is no doubt the media is being manipulated by certain governmental and private agencies and companies, and I'm sure there is a degree of cooperation between these groups and departments, for a common goal.
What if the agenda behind the mass shootings is this; "Hijack the alternative media" with the same old tactics, 'get em whilst they're in shock' ?
blackvault wrote:This is now starting to get a lot of attention for those seeking the truth on Sandy Hook. I don't have any opinion on this either way, but wanted to post it here for discussion. I think the silly music definitely takes away from the seriousness of it, but alas:
Watch how many informants they activated in a hoax. It might be a drill. Actors went into the house to check in or receiving instruction. They were monitored by helicopter, too.
blackvault wrote:Here is another documentary on the shooting, which is getting a lot of attention on YouTube. Archived here for discussion:
To organize a plot, the Feds used to choose an area they controlled. In my case I found they control three factors: Police, coroner, and judge. Here is my observation written in 2003. To cover up a murder case, they need the help of the coroner. Here is how they replaced the local coroner with one of their own. (148. Regime change in San Jose Police, “169. Development of Regime change in San Jose Police”, “170. Suspends Coroner (10/11/2003)”, “171. Extort judge (10/16)”)
170. Suspends Coroner (10/11/2003)
Same day (10/3), on the same page of reporting the death, illness, accident, resignation of San jose police force, (see message #169) there was also an article about the suspension of a coroner. re:
"County suspends coroner Reasons unclear for paid leave of at least 2 weeks. Gregory Schmunk, Santa Clara chief medical examiner, hired four years ago to clean up a troubled coroner's office, was put on paid leave indefinitely Thursday after recent criticism over an old theft charge against him." (S.J.M.N. 10/3/03)
The article and the article in next day (10/4), said Schmunk had been accused of stealing more than $400 in medical books when he left his job as brown County medical examiner four years ago. But the charge was dismissed after he sent a $406 check to his former employer.
He was also accused of failing to disclose, as required by law, that he had been involved in a lawsuit when he applied a gun permit in 1999. The lawsuit was a civil complaint in which he threatened a Sacramento co-worker. But he paid $2,500 in 1995 and had settled that dispute.
Another accusation is he spent $42,000 in travel expenses over past three years. "That raises question about his judgement, given the county's budget situation."
The San Jose Mercury requests Schmunk to resign based on these charges either is on minor matter or is unnecessary.(10/10) Arnold Schwarzenegger has committed more serious offenses of series groping women but inside group can still send such a villain to be a Governor. Schmunk, just like former Governor Davis, made no offense, is being ousted because Feds need a patsy of their own.So Feds can commit a plot.
At same time they also indicted a judge and an ex-cop of conspiracy. When the newspaper was full of these unusual reports, I can feel Feds activate a large resource to extort the judicial system in San Jose area. From judge, police officer to coroner, they try to c http://conspiracycorner.yuku.com/topic/ ... /1/?page=3
Newtown Mother Exposing Sandy Hook Corruption at Public Hearing
In a furious presentation of mixed words a Newtown resident lays out her thoughts during a Bipartisan Task Force Public Hearing. By Shepard Ambellas theintelhub.com February 5, 2013 NEWTOWN HIGH SCHOOL — In a strange twist of events, Susan McGuinness Getzinger (a local resident) has come forward regarding shady actions in the Connecticut school system.
The woman stated that her husband was killed in a fatal car accident the night after she protested local corruption at a previous public hearing.
The woman calls out the 3 top administrators of the Newtown School District and mentions a law firms involvement.
The woman states in the hearing, “You walk into your PPT or Educational Hearing, they are all in on it. The staff is told not to identify, they can’t pay their mortgage if they speak out against it. It’s wrong. Fix it. Dead Kid’s that’s the price got it?”.
The woman is rather scattered during her presentation, but goes on to end the presentation before being swiftly removed from the podium with, “Adam Lanza was the first victim cause he probably had medical problems, and the attorneys sealed the records!”.
A speaker cuts the woman off as she is whisked off stage.
“We Were Having A Drill”: Sandy Hook 3rd Grader Spills The Beans – From The Mouths Of Babes Comes The Truth Saturday, February 9, 2013
One very recent comment from the video on YouTube:
Wow. If you watch carefully, you will see that after the kid says "When we were having a drill, we were hiding under, like...," his mother (the woman sitting next to him in the black sweater) nudges him with her arm, his body moves slightly in response, and his eyes quickly dart towards her, then back again. Then, Dr. Oz immediately taps him on the shoulder and quickly changes the subject, so the kid doesn't say anything more about it being a drill. From the mouths of babes comes the truth
In big plot, the Feds used to organize a similar exercise too, to assure its success. In 7/22/2011 Norway terror attack:
Norwegian Police Confirm Drill Identical to Breivik’s Attack • Kurt Nimmo Infowars.com August 26, 2011
The Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten reports today police sources have confirmed that hours before Anders Behring Breivik launched his deadly attack at a political summer camp on Utøya island on July 22, police had conducted a drill for a “practically identical scenario.”
“Sources within the top level management of the police in Oslo have confirmed to Aftenposten that the drill finished at 15:00 that same Friday,” the newspaper reports. “All of the officers from the anti-terror unit that later took part at the bombsite at the government buildings and went out to Utøya to apprehend Anders Behring Breivik had been training on the exact same scenario earlier the same day and in the days preceding,” writes Andreas Bakke Foss.
In 7/7/2005 London bombing: (The plot known with Hurricane Katrina, ended on 9/24/2005)
7/7 Mock Terror Drill: What Relationship to the Real Time Terror Attacks? by Michel Chossudovsky August 8, 2005 A fictional "scenario" of multiple bomb attacks on London's underground took place at exactly the same time as the bomb attack on July 7, 2005. Peter Power, Managing Director of Visor Consultants, a private firm on contract to the London Metropolitan Police, described in a BBC interview how he had organized and conducted the anti-terror drill, on behalf of an unnamed business client. The fictional scenario was based on simultaneous bombs going off at exactly the same time at the underground stations where the real attacks were occurring:
U.S. SPY Satellite Agency’s Mock 9/11 Drill Exposes Administration Lies By Christopher Bollyn American Free Press
The NRO, which works closely with the Dept. of Defense and CIA, had planned a simulated exercise in which a small jet “crashes” into one of the four towers at the agency's headquarters on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001. The government said it was a “bizarre coincidence” that one of the most important U.S. intelligence agencies had planned a mock plane-into-building crash on Sept. 11, according to the Associated Press who reported the story on August 22.
All those drills were identical to the coming "terror attack" and happened at same time at same place. They played mission to cover up the main attack. In case the perpetrators were found by the security guard at the site, they would pass the security check by disguising as part of the exercise. Here is how it interrupted the air defense:
9/11 War Games paralysis of air defenses to ensure the attack succeeded?
"Is this real world or an exercise?" Col. Robert K. Marr Jr. Northeast Air Defense Sector.
simulation of a plane crash into the NRO headquarters (near Dulles Airport, Virginia) - this was not a "terrorism" exercise but it did result in the evacuation of most NRO employees just as the "real" 9/11 was taking place, making it more difficult for the nation's spy satellites to be used to track the hijacked planes
The publicly available mass media articles about these exercises state that they were similar enough to the actual events that top NORAD personnel were confused, not sure if 9/11 was "part of the drill" or a real world event.
The official government website for the state of Connecticut (ct.gov) lists the drill on their calendar;
9 AM – 4 PM
FEMA L-366 Planning for the Needs of Children in Disasters The government drill that took place on the same day of the shooting between the same hours was located down the road about 14 miles at the following location:
Location: 2800 Main Street, Bridgeport, CT9 AM – 4 PM
Contact: Christopher Ackley Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Phone: (203)-696-2640 5 of 40 seats still available Last day to register: 12/13/2012 Sorry, you may not register for this event. The states official website reads;
Quote, "No one connected to the Sandy Hook shootings testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on gun violence today. I'm thinking, that's because, when you testify before Congress, you have to take an oath. Just by giving their names, the Sandy Hook actors would have committed perjury. –LRP
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed an interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.