The Black Vault Message Forums

Discover the Truth!        

Battle Forum

Gay Marriage - Just Say No !!!!

This is the Battle Forum. It was setup for those threads and conversations that get out of hand - and turn into attacks, name calling and childish behavior. Users head here to hash out their differences. Please be warned before entering...
Forum rules
This is the BATTLE FORUM. A WARNING UP FRONT: ANYTHING GOES HERE!

Expect language and attacks from other members here. This place was setup for those threads that turned to personal attacks, name calling, and other immature behavior.

This is an unmoderated board, except by the site Administrator. There are NO THREATS OF VIOLENCE, BLATANT RACISM, or other ILLEGAL ACTIVITY! Other than that, this is a battle field - so enter and read at your own risk.

Postby at1with0 » Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:47 am

http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2012/12/14/us ... stitution/

I guess one way to legitimize bans on gay marriage is to declare gays as inhuman and, therefore, not being protected under the constitution.

Sound familiar?
"it is easy to grow crazy"
User avatar
at1with0
 
Posts: 9183
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 5:55 pm
Location: the coproduct of the amalgam of all structures

Postby DIss0n80r » Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:55 am

I am a human being.
"I can conceive of nothing in religion, science, or philosophy, that is anything more than the proper thing to wear, for a while." ~ Charles Fort
User avatar
DIss0n80r
 
Posts: 4162
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:45 am

Postby DIss0n80r » Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:16 am

"I can conceive of nothing in religion, science, or philosophy, that is anything more than the proper thing to wear, for a while." ~ Charles Fort
User avatar
DIss0n80r
 
Posts: 4162
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:45 am

Postby greeney2 » Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:45 am

On one hand you are praising the courts, but on the other the very same courts that protected these rights, also protected a handful of Westborrow Baptists, to violate others, by harassing them in a time of complete grief, when they are turning to God for help, and worshiping while burying their dead. I am a bit confused by the balance of logic you are talking about. Unfortunately our system is a confliction of rights at times, and both voters and the courts are divided. Which right should prevail? and how to we guarantee that those rights are protected? What you propose is the oppression of Religious Freedom. Freedom of religion was interfered with, when the highest court in our land, gave permission to Westborrow to invade a town they are not from, and protest against gays and lesbians, at the funerals of these children, at the school there were slandered in? They sided with their freedom of speech to be used in a despicable way. This is the logic of Liberal thinking, when common decency has to be disregarded, in defining our rights. We do not know what is right and wrong anymore, it is all lost in some fog of disappearing boundaries or common decency. That "puke ins" were a form of Freedom of Speech, disregarding the poor fool with the mop and bucket. Who shouldn't feel violated to have to contend with these idiots within hearing distance and eyesight, while you are praying?

You may want to strike all religion out of our system, but you just saw the President invoke, as he should, that even countries like ours need God for some sort of guidance. What amazes me is how people will care less about one of their rights, in order to exploit another. Unless you think it is better to have a totally Atheist society, completely void of religion, you may want to look at the history of that in our world behind the iron curtain, and also of the countries that are completely Islamic, before you condemn Christian religions.
greeney2
 
Posts: 9671
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby DIss0n80r » Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:16 pm

Freedom of speech isn't all sunshine and rainbows, Greene. Welcome to America.

Anyhoo, I wonder if I can have myself declared a corporation and get my personhood back.
"I can conceive of nothing in religion, science, or philosophy, that is anything more than the proper thing to wear, for a while." ~ Charles Fort
User avatar
DIss0n80r
 
Posts: 4162
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:45 am

Postby greeney2 » Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:14 pm

People will defend what ever causes fit their agenda, and completely ignore their other rights in the process, giving them no value at all. While labeling them all as hate groups, these gay rights activists have become religious bigots in the process, since universally no religion embraces those choices. Religious persecution is a common theme with these groups, so who is the ones that are the hate groups? Seems to be a lot of similarity between them, and the Atheist hate groups, who if they could would irradicate religions.
greeney2
 
Posts: 9671
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby DIss0n80r » Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:17 pm

I'm not the one making arguments that religious people aren't people.
"I can conceive of nothing in religion, science, or philosophy, that is anything more than the proper thing to wear, for a while." ~ Charles Fort
User avatar
DIss0n80r
 
Posts: 4162
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:45 am

Postby greeney2 » Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:24 pm

Neither did I!
greeney2
 
Posts: 9671
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby DIss0n80r » Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:27 pm

But religious people are.
"I can conceive of nothing in religion, science, or philosophy, that is anything more than the proper thing to wear, for a while." ~ Charles Fort
User avatar
DIss0n80r
 
Posts: 4162
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:45 am

Postby greeney2 » Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:28 pm

I have no idea what you mean?
greeney2
 
Posts: 9671
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

PreviousNext

Return to Battle Forum

cron
  • View new posts
  • View unanswered posts
  • Who is online
  • In total there are 0 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 0 guests (based on users active over the past 10 minutes)
  • Most users ever online was 292 on Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:19 pm
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests