greeney2 wrote:No, what I have said is the issue has been split down the middle both by the voters 51-49%, and by the court rulings. If the issue was as clear cut legally, 2 times the court rulings would not have been decided by one vote. In both of these 2 landmark rulings, each side of the argument has strong legal merit.
What is the strong legal merit of a ban against gay marriage? What is the strong legal merit of government getting involve in marriage anyway?
Oh and btw, do you think that the majority should be able to violate the rights of some people based on their sexual orientation?