The Black Vault Message Forums

Discover the Truth!        

The War on Terrorism & Homeland Security

When Propaganda Masquarades as News

Discuss the War on Terrorism, Homeland Security, Iraq, Afghanistan, North Korea and other global terrorist concerns.

Postby Nigfis » Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:01 am

The week-long Israeli onslaught against largely defenceless Palestinians in Gaza that began on November 14 provides a basis for assessing how Western corporate media whitewash the war crimes of America’s foremost ally in the Middle East.
There are three often intertwined techniques consciously applied to such news coverage—historical context, sourcing, and objectification of the enemy to be targeted. Such practices can readily transform journalism into propaganda that acts to abet such crimes while at the same time allowing journalistic institutions to still claim the mantle of “objectivity.”

Such methods are on full display in the reportage of Israel’s most recent operation in Gaza. The use of such propaganda fits within a broader campaign of media disinformation that subdues potential outrage—particularly in the US—over Israel’s overwhelming use of force against an oppressed and vulnerable people, most of whom are civilians.



When Propaganda Masquerades as News



Meaningful historical context for understanding Israel’s aggression is almost entirely absent from most Western news coverage of the event. If present, such context would illuminate Israeli government officials’ true motivations for a military venture that involved 750 airstrikes in four days alone. “’Operation Pillar of Defense,’” Nile Bowie observes,
launched just months away from Israel’s elections, is a calculated component of the Netanyahu government’s strategy to topple Hamas and continue absorbing Palestinian territory. Decades of occupation and apartheid have shaped the current scenario; Israel has dehumanized an entire people by seizing their land and forcing them into prison-like ghettoes. Adherents to political Zionism have shown contempt for a genuine political solution to the Palestinian conflict, and the Netanyahu administration is poised to crush all opposition to the Jewish state.[1]
Major Western media focused instead on the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) November 14 assassination of Hamas leader and Palestinian hero Ahmed al-Jabari, while blatantly omitting the fact that he was also a major figure in negotiations for a long-term truce between Hamas and Israel freshly brokered by Egypt. Hours before Hamas strongman Ahmed Jabari was assassinated,” Israel’s Haaretz newspaper reported the day following the assassination, “he received the draft of a permanent truce agreement with Israel, which included mechanisms for maintaining the cease-fire in the case of a flare-up between Israel and the factions in the Gaza Strip.”[2]

Apart from Western alternative media such critical details were quickly dispatched to the memory hole. Major news outlets almost systematically relied on Israeli government, military, and intelligence sources to shape its coverage, where Jabari was reviled as “the commander of the military wing of Hamas.” Reuters, for example, proceeded to source an IDF spokeswoman who proceeded to lay out the dominant frame for the coverage. “This is an operation against terror targets of different organizations in Gaza,” she declared. “Jaabari [sic] had ‘a lot of blood on his hands.’ Other militant groups including Islamic Jihad were on the target list.”[3]

A similar report in the UK Telegraph taking the tack of Israeli official pronouncements beings with the lead, “Ahmed Jabari probably didn’t event hear the missile that killed him, launched from a drone in the skies over Gaza City as he drove an ordinary saloon car through a quiet residential street.”[4] Emphasis on Jabari’s military status and alleged criminal and terrorist activities invariably legitimates Israel’s flagrant barbarism. Further, by holding Jabari up as a dangerous renegade supposedly representative of the Palestinian people the stage is set for attacks on civilians that are much more readily rationalized in the public mind.

Honest contextualization of the crisis leading readerships to greater understanding would involve consulting and publicizing both Israeli and Palestinian perspectives—an undertaking Western journalists are now adept at through their routine discussions with Syrian “activists” reporting on the alleged atrocities committed by the Syrian Army against Syrian citizens and the gallant Free Syrian Army “rebels” in that close by theatre.

In the case of Gaza, however, such media are apparently unable to locate well-heeled Palestinian “human rights activists” exiled in London who receive routine reports from like-minded “activists” on the ground in Gaza. If such activists are functioning their reports are not seeing the light of day.

Press coverage further underlines what clearly does not exist in Gaza: a parity of deadly force between the IDF and Palestinians and, moreover, Israel’s victimization at the hands of militant Palestinians. Terms such as “clash,” “conflict,” and “violence” misleadingly suggest exactly these conditions and anticipate permissible actions in a field of battle provided for under the Geneva Conventions. Such terms contrast greatly with aerial attacks using state-of-the-art weaponry on unarmed women and children.

Nevertheless, CBS News presented a timeline of events in Gaza that fit well alongside Israel’s public relations maneuvers seeking to downplay the IDF’s overt aggression. “Israel launches Operation Pillar of Defense in response to days of rocket fire outside of Hamas-ruled Gaza. The offensive, which included 20 airstrikes, resulted in the assassination of Ahmed Jabari, the military commander of Hamas.”[5]

Another failure to provide adequate context and sourcing involves Israel’s relentless drive to build more settlements on Palestinian lands under Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak while firmly refusing Palestinians a right of return. This is one of the most essential and yet misunderstood pieces of the puzzle for understanding Israeli-Palestinian relations. Yet such important historical factors are largely devoid from the prevailing Western media frame through which the Gaza tragedy is viewed.

A LexisNexis Academic search in newspaper and magazine articles and broadcast transcripts for November 13 to November 21 using the terms “Israel,” “Gaza,” and “Hamas” yields 2,203 citations. Of these, less than ten percent (205) mention “settlements,” while barely two percent reference “human rights.”

Given the relevant history and facts most observers would conclude that at the end of the day the leading concepts—land rights, human dignity, justice and respect—must be understood and reconciled before there can be peace in Palestine. The fact that much of the American public especially is misinformed or unaware of the profuse atrocities and injustices committed with its tax dollars and tacitly in its name attests to the continued centrality of propaganda, made all the more effective in its thoroughgoing attempt to masquerade as news.

Notes
1. Nile Bowie, “Gaza and the Politics of ‘Greater Israel,’” Global Research, November 17, 2012 http://www.globalresearch.ca/gaza-the-p ... el/5312107

2. Nir Hasson, “Israeli Peace Activist: Hamas Leader Jabari Killed Amid Talks on Long Term Truce,” Haaretz, November 15, 2012 http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-d ... m-1.478085

3. Ibrahim Barzak/Reuters, “Ahmed Jabari Dead: Hamas Militant Chief Killed in Israeli Airstrike,” Huffington Post, November 15, 2012 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/1 ... 29308.html

4. Nick Meo, “How Israel Killed Ahmed Jabari, Its Toughest Enemy in Gaza,” Telegraph, November 17, 2012 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... -Gaza.html

5. CBS/Associated Press, “Timeline of Recent Israel-Gaza Violence,” CBSNews.com, November 20, 2012 http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-575 ... -violence/

..........................................................................................




Now, I don't (despite some claims) think that Americans are 'bad people' at all, per-se.
I have American friends, and American relatives I love dearly.
What I do find incredible though, is how tightly controlled the US media really is.
Americans, if I may generalise for a moment, seem simply to not know just what Israel does to the people of Palestine, Gaza and the West bank.
Just as a, 'for example'.. Greeney2 really believes that Hamas is armed with Chinese and Iranian Multiple Rocket launchers they fire into Israel!

For those of us outside the US, the disparity in weaponry is just about as complete as it gets.
By far the most common rocket the Palestinians have to defend themselves is the Quassam. These are home-made rockets filled with home-made fuel... sugar and nitrate fertiliser.... and 'warheads', if there are any at all, made from scrounged lumps of TNT or again, home-made explosives.
By comparison, the Israeli arsenal, including its undeclared nuclear arsenal and some of the best technology the States has to offer......... Is killing Palestinians at somewhere around the 400-1 mark.
Yes, that's right... That's roughly 400 Palestinian people (Men, Women and Children. It seems to make no difference to Israel) dead to each Israeli life lost.

Ask yourselves this: How can a country that has invaded and settled someone else's land, legitimately claim to be acting in self-defence?
It can't!
Israel is a racist and apartheid state and has no business being America's 'chosen' state.
The time for change is now, before the US and Israel find themselves totally isolated in the World.
Nigfis
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 3:34 pm

Postby greeney2 » Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:40 am

Nigfis wrote:[i]
Israel is a racist and apartheid state and has no business being America's 'chosen' state.
The time for change is now, before the US and Israel find themselves totally isolated in the World.


But all you ever hear are Muslims screaming death to infidels and Jews.
greeney2
 
Posts: 9527
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby Nigfis » Sat Nov 24, 2012 12:25 pm

greeney2 wrote:
Nigfis wrote:
Israel is a racist and apartheid state and has no business being America's 'chosen' state.
The time for change is now, before the US and Israel find themselves totally isolated in the World.


But all you ever hear are Muslims screaming death to infidels and Jews.

No it isn't Greeney.
That is the whole point of the article. When Propaganda Masquerades as News.
What America is presented with on its tv screens each evening, first seems to have to pass across its Israeli handlers' :liar: desks. I'm not kidding either Greeney. The images and reports you get to see are massively one-sided.
The Apartheid system is as dirty a way to treat people now as it was when we were all calling for its end in Ian Smith's South Africa. Remember?

Here's a site I just found http://www.ifamericansknew.org
It gives a brief synopsis of the Israel Palestinian conflict. It describes the facts at the heart of the conflict.....
Including this last one at the foot of the synopsis: [i]"Largely due to special-interest lobbying, U.S. taxpayers give Israel an average of $8 million per day, and since its creation have given more U.S. funds to Israel than to any other nation. As Americans learn about how Israel is using our tax dollars, many are calling for an end to this expenditure."
I wonder how much good the US could do with own needy with $8,000,000 every single day, year in, year out.
Nigfis
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 3:34 pm

Postby Nigfis » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:13 pm

Bloody hell! Talk about synchronicity: News anchors resign, live on air, tired of lying to people!






Maine News Anchors Cindy Michaels And Tony Consiglio Resign Live On Air

Video in Blackvault's post below.

During their 6 p.m. newscast last night, Bangor-based TV news anchors Cindy Michaels and Tony Consiglio resigned on air, citing, as the Bangor Daily News has described it, "a longstanding battle with upper management over journalistic practices at their Bangor TV stations."

While WVII/WFVX vice president and general manager Mike Palmer called the situation "unfortunate, but not unexpected," the two had not told anyone about their plans to resign before the night's newscast.

Consiglio shared that "I just wanted to know that I was doing the best job I could and was being honest and ethical as a journalist, and I thought there were times when I wasn't able to do that."


The BDN’s online story about the joint resignations drew well over 350,000 views from late Tuesday night to early Wednesday evening, was picked up by national websites like Drudge Report, Yahoo and others, and prompted several calls from national and regional news outlets to Palmer, Consiglio and Michaels for interviews.

“I think if we were able to do it on a general basis, it’s something we’d consider doing in terms of speaking about it to groups or on shows,” said Michaels. “So far we’re being asked to talk about it in specifics of what happened, but we don’t want this to become a back-and-forth blame thing.”


http://bangordailynews.com/2012/11/21/n ... thout-him/ — with Brunei Ala Ala Return, Kimberly Reinitz, Ivan Dosinsky and Vickye Chapman Johnson.
Last edited by Nigfis on Sat Nov 24, 2012 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nigfis
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 3:34 pm

Postby blackvault » Sat Nov 24, 2012 2:34 pm

-----
John Greenewald, Jr.
The Black Vault Website Owner / Operator
http://www.theblackvault.com
User avatar
blackvault
 
Posts: 1743
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 4:04 pm
Location: North Hollywood, Ca.


Return to The War on Terrorism & Homeland Security

  • View new posts
  • View unanswered posts
  • Who is online
  • In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 10 minutes)
  • Most users ever online was 292 on Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:19 pm
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest