capricorn wrote:Cole, to detail your 2nd point.. which I find most interesting...
"Former CIA Director David Petraeus testified in a closed-door hearing Friday morning that his agency determined immediately after the Sept. 11 Libya attack that "Al Qaeda involvement" was suspected -- but the line was taken out in the final version circulated to administration officials, according to a top lawmaker who was briefed. "
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11 ... z2CPMLlkBG
So then.. who took the line out?
Cole_Trickle wrote:But he obviously had ZERO CLUE......
Exactly and who was being Blackmailed with this adultery to keep his mouth shut, by the same person who changed his report wording? Last time I checked, this has to be a crime, altering an official report signed by the head of any department, in a manner to manipulate the truth for an election win, is impeachable.
blackvault wrote:Cole_Trickle wrote:But he obviously had ZERO CLUE......
See? I was actually following your story line (though I don't 100% agree) until you went here. Why operate off of such a powerful assumption. This here, is required, for your theory to make sense... and unless you have some insider knowledge that all of us peons do not, how can you make that leap??
According to reports from members of Congress who attended the closed-door hearings, Petraeus said the information had been included in the original set of talking points prepared by the CIA for the Obama administration. But he said it was removed from the one provided to the UN ambassador, Susan Rice, who used it as the basis for a series of interviews on the weekend after the killings.
Rice is among the contenders to replace Hillary Clinton as US secretary of state. In a press conference this week, Barack Obama, angrily criticised two Republican senators, John McCain and Lindsey Graham, who threatened to block her nomination if the president put her name forward.
Petraeus, who gave evidence to both the Senate and House intelligence committees, said that references to the group alleged to have been behind the 11 September attack were in the CIA's classified talking points, which were classified, but removed from the unclassified memo relied upon by Rice. The reason, he said, was not to tip off the group about what the US authorities knew.
Briefing reporters later, Republicans and Democrats on the committees put different glosses on the evidence given by Petraeus, who resigned a week ago over an extramarital affair.
Cole_Trickle wrote: Please...let's not get emotional...I don't consider anyone here to be a peon. I've just read until my eyes have bled, and seen way too many situations in the past to know without doubt, that the President of the US....Regardless of who it is, isn't privy to every single thing that takes place everywhere in the world 24/7.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest