The Black Vault Message Forums

Discover the Truth!        

General Discussion Topics

Behind the Benghazi Cover-Up

The Black Vault Message Forums has a considerable number of niche forums to place your post. If you can not find a home for it, and the topic doesn't fit anywhere else, then post it here.

Postby En-Lugal » Wed Oct 24, 2012 5:54 am

Cole_Trickle wrote:Dude...Romney isn't responsible for any of it...Those trying their arses off to get him elected ARE..It's been reported by the intelligence community, you know those over at the " SPECIAL OPS " web site. I'm sure you've no interest in reading any of the info I posted in that regard because it counters claims you've posted which were taken from a bought and paid for source. You're denying, but I understand.


I have no interest in your left-wing nut job site because nothing they say is based in fact. It's all a bunch of sensationalist, "read between the lines", paraphrasing rhetoric. Intelligence community. :lol: :lol: :lol: No, I've read your quotes and followed your links. Nothing in them would lead a sane and rational person to come to the conclusions you nutters do. I realize people like to role-play to fill the void in their otherwise uninteresting lives but it's awkward when they start to believe it. It's especially awkward when it's a bunch of forty-somethings and older, special ops indeed. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I wonder who makes the chopper noises when you guys are playing special ops. Do you guys have conventions with cos-play like the Trekkie's? :ugeek:
The modern definition of ‘racist’ is someone who’s winning an argument with a liberal.
User avatar
En-Lugal
 
Posts: 560
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:19 am

Postby greeney2 » Wed Oct 24, 2012 8:57 am

Iran is not waving the saber? Even you don't believe that one Cole. :lol:
greeney2
 
Posts: 9668
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby Cole_Trickle » Fri Oct 26, 2012 4:23 am

I have no interest in your left-wing nut job site because nothing they say is based in fact.


Yeah I used to think this way myself until I began watching and checking as time went by....It's pretty clear that their initial information is light years beyond what you're being told by the MSM in both accuracy and reality.

As I say, I understand your position, it's pretty cut and dried....another success story for those pulling the strings..

The site was started by those within the Military special ops groups....a place where they could vent so to speak.....Kind of a lonely field " INTELLIGENCE " that is............Given your keen sense of reality, I'm sure you'd agree.

Nutters eah.....lol..

Odd how this story and the events, ended up morphing into exactly what they had posted about on the very day after it all went down.

So I must ask.....Who are the real nutters here. 8-)

Oh good catch on the banner thing in regard to the rigged election.....I'm sure that was just an honest mistake... :lol:

Cole
User avatar
Cole_Trickle
 
Posts: 2709
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby En-Lugal » Fri Oct 26, 2012 2:31 pm

I'm sure the GOP are responsible for the Democrats failing to nominate a candidate with a shred of integrity and belief in the Constitution as well. Got any left-wing nut job articles for that? The only way someone can be so sure of something without any proof, is if a bias exists. Your hatred for Republicans is the bias being exploited here. If you used to think differently then ask yourself what the catalyst was. Then look at the ways that bias is being manipulated and exploited.

Even vague, non-descript, 900 hotline psychics can be right 85% of the time. That's what these sensationalist journalists and tabloid-esque websites do. Then of course there's the out right nut job theories from both the left and right. For over a decade now, I've listened to Liberal Democrats via music artists, actors, comedians, athletes and politicians go on and on about Bush. I've agreed with much of what they said and supported them on issues like corporate greed and wrecking our environment. Issues with violations to our Constitutional rights and civil liberties.

Fast forward to Obama's administration and not a damn word or criticism can be aimed at this president or the rabid Liberal Democrats will cry for your death. They turn a blind eye to some of the most horrendous human rights, Constitutional and civil liberties violations in U.S. history. They allow this because it's their guy doing it. Now not all Democrats have fallen in line, of course, but they've seen their careers severely damaged for it. Sound like anyone you despise? The same things Democrats accuse the Republicans of doing. All credibility has been lost, in my opinion.

Cole_Trickle wrote:Oh good catch on the banner thing in regard to the rigged election.....I'm sure that was just an honest mistake... :lol:


Yeah I'm sure the Obama Administration didn't mean for that to go up until election night. Oops! :lol:
The modern definition of ‘racist’ is someone who’s winning an argument with a liberal.
User avatar
En-Lugal
 
Posts: 560
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:19 am

Postby blackvault » Sat Oct 27, 2012 9:43 am

I hope you will all help me spread the word on this. This is circulating the social network scene right now... please feel free to forward it around as well.

------

Image


The Benghazi Cover-Up. This isn't ok. Check out the research: http://ow.ly/eOh3F (Work in progress) #blackvault #benghazi LIKE and SHARE with your friends...
-----
John Greenewald, Jr.
The Black Vault Website Owner / Operator
http://www.theblackvault.com
User avatar
blackvault
 
Posts: 1768
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 4:04 pm
Location: North Hollywood, Ca.

Postby En-Lugal » Sun Oct 28, 2012 6:09 pm

Shared the pic and links to the article on MySpace. Yeah I know but I hated Facebook and deleted mine.
The modern definition of ‘racist’ is someone who’s winning an argument with a liberal.
User avatar
En-Lugal
 
Posts: 560
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:19 am

Postby Cole_Trickle » Mon Oct 29, 2012 5:48 pm

Here spread this...........It's 100 x's more accurate....WOW..Can't believe how slanted you've become.

Image

fabrications.

The killing of Ambassador Stephens in Benghazi has become a ghoulish election ploy played by Fox News, Huffington Post and others. All are printing and broadcasting conjecture, total falsehood and the usual biased and unreliable garbage they are famous for.Neither publication/network has qualified intelligence and/or military advisors. To be former military and work for Fox is considered prostitution


The ambush at Benghazi required careful coordination. There was no Al Qaeda involvement and there has never been any history of Al Qaeda on the ground in Libya. Moreover, intelligence insiders use the term “Al Qaeda” when looking for money from “congressional critters” too stupid to know that the CIA has always run “Al Qaeda” as a way of avoiding explaining why dozens of small organizations and even friendly intelligence groups will, for obscure reasons, attack American targets.

Fox reported that a large convoy of Libyan milita relieved the compound at 3AM but that there had been no aid until 4 AM:


Can you guys follow this???????/

They were killed by a mortar shell at 4 a.m. Libyan time, nearly seven hours after the attack on the consulate began — a window that represented more than enough time for the U.S. military to send back-up from nearby bases in Europe, according to sources familiar with Special Operations. Four mortars were fired at the annex. The first one struck outside the annex. Three more hit the annex.

A motorcade of dozens of Libyan vehicles, some mounted with 50 caliber machine guns, belonging to the February 17th Brigades, a Libyan militia which is friendly to the U.S., finally showed up at the CIA annex at approximately 3 a.m.


Generously one can call this kind of reporting inconsitencies. Either they are there or they aren’t, either it is 3am or 4am but not both.

Nothing is simple enough for congress and the American people, this is the belief. When in doubt…lie.

The attack in Benghazi was coordinated with the broadcast of the Terry Jones/CATO Institute/Tea Party telethon worldwide. Rioting broke out in Tripoli but not Benghazi.

Ambassador Stephens had a 6 man detail, former SEALS, all private contractors from L3 Communications, a British company contracted to supply diplomatic security.

The team used was one of the best in the world, equal to any normal task, and by normal, we mean “high risk.” This is standard State Department policy and those used were not only top quality operators but went through months of specialized training at Blackwater’s facilities here in the US.

The second problem was tied to the Ambassador being, not in the Capitol, Tripoli, but in Benghazi to open a museum. I am deeply suspicious of this and as the CATO Institute and State Department are “co-mingled,” it would have been easy for information on the movements of the ambassador and his team to have been telegraphed to the enemy forces who had been positioned in Benghazi.

The forces themselves were spotted at the Tripoli airport several days in advance. Some may have entered from Egypt and some from Tunisia but 50 had come in from the UAE and were identified as Special Forces, UAE Special Forces, who had completed an extensive training program by retired US Special Forces and through the specialized American school for “irregular warfare,” located 45 miles outside Budapest, Hungary.

The attack itself involved pre-positioning two levels of blockade, one tying up any possible relief in Benghazi a kilometer away and another setting up a perimeter about 200 yards around the compound. Streets were blocked and heavy weapons, RPGs, truck mounted anti-aircraft guns and large mortars were used.

Mortar fire was so accurate that the compound had to have been pretargeted in advance. The first round hit the roof of the main building in the compound of 7 homes, all with minimal security.

The primary reason for no additional forces to have been available was the controversy during the civil war. Anti-war activists and “anti-imperialists in the pay of the Gaddafi family along with David Welch of Bechtel Corporation and Israeli mercenaries and advisors, along with troops from across Africa, specialists from Serbia and Belarus and other nations, created something more than a “fog of war” but rather a “fog of truth.”Paid “shills” working for Gaddafi continually warned of Americans coming into the country armed as an occupation force. Thus, when the war ended, no armed Americans were brought in, only one small team and two CIA agents.

There were 3 additional armed local militia members providing security for the CIA who could have reached Stephens except for the blocked communications, the blocked roads and being outnumbered 30 to one.

The US does maintain 2 C130 gunships in the region. These are slow moving transport aircraft stationed at times in Northern Sardinia but more often further away at Aviano in Italy, North of Venice.

These are Air Force planes, not Navy.

The gunships are extremely effective weapons and would have been of help had they been available, had they been called though all radio and telephone traffic was jammed as with the 1967 attack on the USS Liberty and had the personnel in need of support been stationary and secure with strobe markers to secure them from the 20mm, 40mm and 105mm weapons on the AC130.

Instead, we have been informed, a two pronged and highly coordinated attack drove the US group to a safe house, into vehicles and corralled them in a pre-positioned ambush where their vehicle was attacked by a “quad 50″ anti-aircraft gun mounted on the back of a truck.

Such a weapon could destroy a Bradley Armoured Personnel Carrier or shoot down an Apache attack helicopter.

What is clear is that help was not available, that America moved into Libya with a minimal presence so as to seem unaggressive, to please critics of President Obama’s foreign policy among Republicans in Congress.

Blame them.


http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/10/26 ... -nonsense/

Cole
User avatar
Cole_Trickle
 
Posts: 2709
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby blackvault » Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:46 pm

Seriously? So an editorial by Gordon Duff completely convinces you #1) Obama is innocent and #2) Republicans are to blame. Nice... biased... slanted... and completely inaccurate.

What Mr. Duff has done with this article that you cut and pasted, was simply this: ignore the facts and spin whatever facts he can. You really think he knows (like any of us do?) the real inside story behind this all? I don't claim I, you , he, or anyone does. But Duff sure likes to pretend he does. You can spin this all you'd like, but the fact remains, Obama failed at dealing with Benghazi. You really believe that with the resources we have publicly, and the resources we have not so public, that the U.S. could not have helped on that timeline? Evidence, REAL evidence (not conjecture or editorialized spin - Duff writes about the tea party and anything else anti-Republican that he can) speaks for itself. Duff's spin and opinion doesn't even touch the real facts.

What about the convenient lies by not only Obama, but the entire upper echelon of his administration? How about the blatant cover-up by the State department? How about the obvious stalling on admission of terrorism, on facts behind the case, etc. etc.? Oh sure, there is a "independent investigation" because Obama is so compassionate... but the results... well, you guessed it, they will come AFTER the November elections.

Then we have Duff's notorious bashing of FoxNews. Clever, new, and original. Oh wait, that's been done too. They are crucified by the liberal elite, simply for doing a journalists job. How dare they, you know? You've seen Obama address this question, right? About Benghazi? Or have you, like Mr. Duff, ignored the blatant attempt by the President himself, to lie his way out of dealing with the issue? Maybe not even lie - just dodge it and duck it all together. You can decide that one.

I'll help:



If you really feel Obama is innocent, this is a FoxNews concocted story, and this is a political issue, then I feel pretty bad you live in quite a small bubble. This isn't politics... this is reality. This isn't a concocted story, the facts, the ones Mr. Duff left out of his article, are still real, and still undeniable. And Obama is far from innocent.

But, maybe Huffington Post has an article that we can copy too that will blame Republicans? Because, if they second Duff's opinion/editorial, then it has to be true Republicans are at fault.

[Not directed at you, Cole] -- Only a liberal would still find a way to blame something completely in Obama's court, during his administration, on his watch, with his own decision, using his own lies, orchestrating his own coverup, etc., and spin it to being the Republicans fault. Reminds me of a whiny 6 year old blaming his classmate for something and constantly crying..."But it's his fault.... it's his fault... it's HIS FAULT... WAAAAAAAHHHH!!!!!"
-----
John Greenewald, Jr.
The Black Vault Website Owner / Operator
http://www.theblackvault.com
User avatar
blackvault
 
Posts: 1768
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 4:04 pm
Location: North Hollywood, Ca.

Postby greeney2 » Tue Oct 30, 2012 11:28 pm

Telling more tall tales Cole, like the Colorado Smiling one?
greeney2
 
Posts: 9668
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby Cole_Trickle » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:05 am

What about the convenient lies by not only Obama, but the entire upper echelon of his administration? How about the blatant cover-up by the State department? How about the obvious stalling on admission of terrorism, on facts behind the case, etc. etc.? Oh sure, there is a "independent investigation" because Obama is so compassionate... but the results... well, you guessed it, they will come AFTER the November elections.


John, You're being extremely naive...

Please explain what benefit anyone gains form covering up something of this nature? I'd be very curious as to your opinion on this matter.

Duff is intel, sits on a few boards of companies who's job is KNOWING WTF is actually going on.....Why this is lost of you is beyond my scope. Me ..lol...I've no dawg in this fight, I only seek the truth.

This incident has been turned into a political football--" THAT WAS THE WHOLE IDEA "

Why are you conveniently ignoring the information proving beyond doubt that this was an actual professional hit, and not some act of terrorism? You come across as an apologists by doing so.

120 trained and well armed men................and you want someone to do WHAT?

They were laying in wait for just that very thing...........to slaughter more ...

Do you know just how long this event took to play out in real time?

The folks who did this were trained by US MILITARY/ ACTIVE AND RE-TIRED--Turned contractors............this is a documented fact....You want Obama to tell the US Citizenry
this?????????

Is it possible that Obama was played by the CIA? Oh hell no...........they'd never do such a thing...would they.

Sorry man but you're refusal to look at this with an open mind is depressing.

After the election right....is this the excuse for COVERING THIS UP? Talk about convenient..

Cole
User avatar
Cole_Trickle
 
Posts: 2709
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion Topics

cron
  • View new posts
  • View unanswered posts
  • Who is online
  • In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 10 minutes)
  • Most users ever online was 292 on Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:19 pm
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest