greeney2 wrote:Like you get Swedens Rape laws or the UK Supreme Court?
rath wrote:greeney2 wrote:Like you get Sweden's Rape laws or the UK Supreme Court?
I don't need to know the ins & outs of Sweden's laws to know that something that was not a crime, when the said event took place ..... means no laws were broken.
if it's not illegal, it's not a crime.
ergo .... derrrr.
Told you Greeny2 .... laws can't be acted retrospectively.
julian Assange cant be charged with a crime, .... THAT WAS NOT A CRIME, when the event took place.
See Greeney2, you live in the USA & you don't even know how your own laws work.
On the other hand the U.S judicial system just confirmed my entire position.
like i said the rule of law, is constricted by no boundary.
In the same way the USA cant charge people retroactively ....
Nor can Sweden or any other nation in the Western world.