humphreys wrote:It's okay to have three nations because they form Great Britain, it's not just a random thing they decided to do. I don't make the rules, if you don't like the fact the Olympics officially allow us to compete as GB instead of England then take it up with the relevant authorities.
However, your comparison to teaming up Australia with China...I don't really get your point. China do well without the Australian's help, and England would do just fine without Scotland and Wales, far better than the Aussies still, and this is indisputable because Yorkshire alone would have come 11th.
And yes, this is the first time we have done better than you guys, but it shows an alarming new trend - like I said, you guys had better have an overhaul of the way you do things else you're going to become the laughing stock of the world.
I never said there was anything wrong with it.
Im just pointing out, that we let you have that handicap because your so bad at sports.
& even with the handicap of competing as three different nations as one ........ you still can't beat Australia.At the London 2012 games just gone, you had a second handicap given to you, as you had automatic qualification in every event as the home nation.
humphreys wrote:rath wrote:Ar ..... your just saying that coz we beat the USA.
I am Team GB, don't really care how the US did.
Did you miss this part:
"If you want to mess with figures like this I believe YORKSHIRE alone got as many gold medals as Australia. Let that sink in mate. YORKSHIRE, is just a single county in England, and they got as many golds as you. Incredible."
You either got hammered by GB altogether, or if you want to diddle with figures you lost to Yorkshire. Either way LOL
humphreys wrote:However, your comparison to teaming up Australia with China...I don't really get your point. China do well without the Australian's help, and England would do just fine without Scotland and Wales, far better than the Aussies still, and this is indisputable because Yorkshire alone would have come 11th.
And yes, this is the first time we have done better than you guys, but it shows an alarming new trend - like I said, you guys had better have an overhaul of the way you do things else you're going to become the laughing stock of the world.
humphreys wrote:And yes, this is the first time we have done better than you guys, but it shows an alarming new trend
That's so cute, .......... You think your playing with the big boys now.
Once is hardly a trend.
humphreys wrote:rath wrote:Ar ..... your just saying that coz we beat the USA.
I am Team GB, don't really care how the US did.
Did you miss this part:
"If you want to mess with figures like this I believe YORKSHIRE alone got as many gold medals as Australia. Let that sink in mate. YORKSHIRE, is just a single county in England, and they got as many golds as you. Incredible."
You either got hammered by GB altogether, or if you want to diddle with figures you lost to Yorkshire. Either way LOL
humphreys wrote:However, your comparison to teaming up Australia with China...I don't really get your point. China do well without the Australian's help, and England would do just fine without Scotland and Wales, far better than the Aussies still, and this is indisputable because Yorkshire alone would have come 11th.
If Australia lost to Yorkshire, how is it Yorkshire medal tally put them in 11th place.
Yet Australia finished in 10th place.
Nice fudge of the figures there humphreys.