The Black Vault

picture compare with Madrid fire

You find more garbage to post than anyone here. Usually numbered, but one at least was not numbered.

Here we go again!

Even though, he has 30x the number of posts, even though he himself has 8000 more than katsung47's, greeney2 wrote:You find more garbage to post than anyone here. Usually numbered, but one at least was not numbered.

Here we go again!

Yours should be numbered. That was #8262.

I wish it had been a hoax. I think you meant it was an inside job.

Well, it definitely was not a hoax, I have been there, it actually happened kid... Judging by the picture you probably meant inside job, that is a different matter, I sure hope it wasn't.

Come on, I don't understand how anyone could think this was an inside job. Remember, George W. Bush helped to establish the 9/11 commission which investigated George W. Bush. That's like Charles Manson getting his cult followers to investigate Charles Manson, its bound to be successful.!

Stop thinking people! We vote people to think so we don't have to.
Be Patriotic by doing what the govt tells you to do. Watch reality TV, take your flu shot and spend spend spend your money!

And most importantly, don't forget that on order to catch terrorists you will probably need to have your genitals fondled every now and then. If you have a problem with all that then your probably a terrorist.

Could the fire burn down WTC?



(10) Another reason that we know the fires were not as serious as claimed, is that there are photos of people in the impacted region after the planes hit the building (and before it collapsed). The above photos show at least two survivors of the impact and the initial jet-fuel fire.

http://guardian.150m.com/wtc/small/not-so-hot.htm

WTC 7 collapse

The fire could burn down WTC and Pentagon but couldn’t burn a hair of a monitor and book?



Pentagon book

http://my.opera.com/katsung47/albums/sh ... =165391572

Pentagon monitor




The pentagon was not hit by a airliner. See for yourself