The Black Vault Message Forums

Discover the Truth!        

The War on Terrorism & Homeland Security

WikiLeaks dumps Syrian emails

Discuss the War on Terrorism, Homeland Security, Iraq, Afghanistan, North Korea and other global terrorist concerns.

Postby rath » Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:39 am

July 5, 2012.

WikiLeaks says it is publishing over two million emails from Syrian political figures dating back to 2006 amid the bloody crackdown on dissent by Syria's ruling regime.

"Just now ... WikiLeaks began publishing the Syria files, more than two million emails from Syrian political figures, ministries and associated companies dating from August 2006 to March 2012," spokeswoman Sarah Harrison told journalists in London.

Harrison told journalists the emails reveal interactions between the Syrian government and Western companies.


WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who is currently seeking asylum at the Ecuadorean embassy in London, was not at the brief presentation.

He is wanted by British police for possible extradition to Sweden to face questions about alleged sexual misconduct there.

Harrison acknowledged that WikiLeaks is facing "a difficult time at the moment" but said "we are continuing to work through that".
Image
rath
 
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby ricardo » Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:42 am

IRAN might as well come clean now. we know there is going to be some
" smoking gun " implicating Iran in all sorts of nefarious shady dealing...

involving ...all things nuclear , all things Hezbollah , gun and drug smuggling,
and forced prostitution to round out the bunch. why this intel didn't come out
sooner , I have no idea. ( make believe leverage ,courtesy cyber force)


Iran did it . confess now ! :naughty:



red flag rag

opinion.
User avatar
ricardo
 
Posts: 1494
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2011 9:10 pm

Postby ricardo » Wed Jul 11, 2012 3:08 pm

bradley manning and Julian assange - not so much exculpatory evidence
denied for manning but deceptions necessary to obfuscate directors of the operation. logically , anything that tangibly exculpates , manning,
will lead to the main actors .
User avatar
ricardo
 
Posts: 1494
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2011 9:10 pm

Postby rath » Fri Jul 13, 2012 8:22 pm

ricardo wrote:bradley manning and Julian assange - not so much exculpatory evidence
denied for manning but deceptions necessary to obfuscate directors of the operation. logically , anything that tangibly exculpates , manning,
will lead to the main actors .


The fact is Manning has never implicated Julian Assange in any of his acts.

Thus there is no Prima Facie case against Assange.

Like i said in other topics about Wikileaks.

There is no evidence that Manning gave Any of the classified documents to Julian Assange.

& for all we know Manning gave the documents to China or Russia or a terrorist group who sort to make the documents public for their own reasons. ( &/or to humiliate the USA )
Image
rath
 
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby ricardo » Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:29 am

rath wrote:
ricardo wrote:bradley manning and Julian assange - not so much exculpatory evidence
denied for manning but deceptions necessary to obfuscate directors of the operation. logically , anything that tangibly exculpates , manning,
will lead to the main actors .


The fact is Manning has never implicated Julian Assange in any of his acts.

Thus there is no Prima Facie case against Assange.

Like i said in other topics about Wikileaks.

There is no evidence that Manning gave Any of the classified documents to Julian Assange.

& for all we know Manning gave the documents to China or Russia or a terrorist group who sort to make the documents public for their own reasons. ( &/or to humiliate the USA )


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My posit is, there is Internet dialogue that will definitively imply 3rd party direction.not post leak activity. In my opinion mil.prosecutors on the east coast know this.Pollard one of Americas most prolific spy's, based on level and amount of data lost. Was granted A interview from wolf blitzed CNN. Not long after arrest. The data loss alone was and is considerable In damage. He's alive . Wasnt put to death. Curious why manning was in total isolation months ,for low level classified data, the experts say caused little if no harm At all .
User avatar
ricardo
 
Posts: 1494
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2011 9:10 pm

Postby greeney2 » Sat Jul 14, 2012 11:10 am

Hey lets let every kid in Highschool joyride in your car everynight, if they bring it back clean. :lol:

Is there a difference if you rob a bank of $10,000 and rob another one that only has $10 in the till?
Both are the same Federal bank robbery crime!

Is there a difference between shooting someone and they survive and shooting at someone and missing their head by 1/4"? Both are the same crime, attempted murder!

Is there a diffence when 3 parties conspire a crime, they are not equally guilty?
greeney2
 
Posts: 9632
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby rath » Sat Jul 14, 2012 7:36 pm

greeney2 wrote:Hey lets let every kid in Highschool joyride in your car everynight, if they bring it back clean. :lol:

Is there a difference if you rob a bank of $10,000 and rob another one that only has $10 in the till?
Both are the same Federal bank robbery crime!

Is there a difference between shooting someone and they survive and shooting at someone and missing their head by 1/4"? Both are the same crime, attempted murder!

Is there a diffence when 3 parties conspire a crime, they are not equally guilty?


No

Wrong ... wrong ... wrong.

Is there a difference between shooting someone and they survive and shooting at someone and missing their head by 1/4"? Both are the same crime, attempted murder!


There is a difference. DER.

it all depends on the circumstance of the crime, & any mitigating facts.

Is there a difference if you rob a bank of $10,000 and rob another one that only has $10 in the till?
Both are the same Federal bank robbery crime!


& again yes there is a difference.

Circumstance of the crime & facts facts facts ........

How was the bank robbed & where from .... Via the internet ( internet crime ) & from what country was the bank robbed .... USA, Canada, Australia, England. = OR = China, Russia, Libya, Columbia, Ethiopia.

Different jurisdictions have different laws.

& a crime in one country may not always be a crime in another.

But we have been over that have we not. ( Sweden, & rape laws age of consent & bestiality )
Image
rath
 
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am


Return to The War on Terrorism & Homeland Security

  • View new posts
  • View unanswered posts
  • Who is online
  • In total there are 2 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 2 guests (based on users active over the past 10 minutes)
  • Most users ever online was 292 on Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:19 pm
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests