this is pointless dogma , and should have a balance from the doves on Iran .
the crowning of individuals albeit excellent writers, as the inferred
knowledgeable insiders and spokespersons for Iran /Americans,
is disingenuous , and counterproductive. why ? counterpoints support
original dogma. so, your doves w/ hawk talons...
the mutt and Jeff routine ( good cop bad cop)( carrot /stick ) obsolete .
of attempting confessions , to consolidate positions as well , and the
willful neglect/ entertaining a obsessional idea that the Islamic republic of Iran
will suddenly pull her sails down, on the fast running ship; named progress, and nuclear rights.
because , the (us )rhetoric; right and left, veiled , disingenuous,attempts
to bully Obama and leverage congress ,while negating the two negotiating bodies, fraudulently into returning to the singular thought ,that ,trading in stolen horses really does work ? ( enrichment rights and restoring trade. } it's ludicrous . one does not follow the other, they negate each other as well...( negotiating in bad faith.)
and yes, the American position is attempting to multi task all three objectives ,
leadership change, nuclear hegemony ,and ,military confrontation if necessary.
in what order . is arguable .
I would hope irans position remains central to the discussions. under the
auspice of N.P.T. and REGIONAL objectives. so stated, on record.
in addition and from a non / professional opinion. these two incredible talking points to implement in order to restore confidence in "good faith negotiations "
apparently prior goals failed because America refused its own demands?
1)What about the suggested 'recognition of irans right to enrich' as a good faith effort and confidence building measure. ?
2) the lone wolf : israelians officially admitting ownership of weapons of mass destruction. and, they , the israelians ,becoming signatories to NPT .(reciprocal scrutiny and monitoring) jus like the other sovereign nation Iran .(Persia )
also, I did see 20 % floated . [from a third party non official. that is to say, the article read. ' at 20% ' clarification needed. ]
alternate types of reactors that will make these issues moot . ( discussed?)
stated goal: a WMD free middle east...ultimately the entire world.
any co/ member state that requests additional impartiality in attendance . my be present. confidence.
you want to take your 20 % and go to -convert to - " plate." ?
everybody must . why only Iran ? [ no one can take the words of one or two men
an hold the entire population hostage. under threat of use of force. ]
convoluted language that attempts to justify the maintanance of WMP.
(Ahmadinejad alleged comments... wiping Israel off the map.
if accurate translation)
(a nuclear " no country left behind " initiative.)
Israel , north Korea, India, pak, us , everybody .