296. Regime change of Hongkong (3/12/05)
In later January, when the "dirty bomb" frame case was soured, my relatives came to invite me for a trip to China in April. I thus knew Feds would start another plot two months later. Then news reported Arnold Schwarzenegger would visit China in mid April. I think he would play as a guarantor for the new secret deal.
My message #292 which talked about Israel's control over US touched off a sudden frame attempt on 2/24.(see #294.) After 2/24, they planned something bigger. A regime change in Hongkong. My Revelation touched the nerve of D.O.J..
On 3/2, TV reported that the chief executive of Hong Kong, Tung Chee Hwa, would be stepping down.
It is unusual because there had been great effort to oust Tung Chee Wah before. South-east financial crisis, SARS, had brought Hongkong to a depression. One million people had gone to street demanding Tung's resignation. He passed through the opposition and even got his second term. Now the economy in Hongkong is much better; Tung's approve rate is rising; there is only two years left for his rest term, why there is an abrupt resignation?
When I heard the news, I realized D.O.J. made another deal with China. It is a regime change. To replace the Chief executive of Hongkong to someone of their own so Feds can carry out framed case.
Tung Chee Wah is a business man without intelligence background. The heir-apparent is Donald Tsang, a second ranking official of Hongkong. Tsang was trained by former British colony government. He is obviously an intelligence insider of Western.
My wife has relatives in Hongkong. Last April, FBI director R. Mueller warned a terror bombing in Hongkong and ten days later, my wife's uncle died. I alleged it was work of Feds. (see #223. FBI director said HongKong will be attacked (4/24/04) and #226) Now, with new Hongkong chief their's, the frame case will expand to there. D.O.J. makes it a big one.
All these happened in three weeks since 2/20. TV reported Condoleezza Rice would vist China next week. I think she was sent to China to settle that big deal. The price of regime change of Hongkong must be big. The payment likely will be Taiwan.
(Strong EM-wave attack caused a severe tooth ache. I'm afraid I can't go over the web-site I used to cover. Zionist D.O.J. goes crazy.)
297. Graham and Disney (3/17/05)
The news about Walter Disney in May, 1993 came with the publish of book "Walter Disney, Hollywood's dark prince". In which W. Disney was described negatively. That he was an abused boy; he drank heavily; he persecuted his employees; he was anti-semitic, anti-union, anti-communism. Most disturbing thing was that he was a FBI informant which W. Disney's family strongly denied.
Walter Disney is a beloved American icon. Every person has a nice memory of a childhood with Micky mouse and Snow White. Why he was so much humiliated?
The author of the book said his information obtained through the Freedom of Information Act. It was an excuse. There are many celebrities who are FBI informants. Why they are protected from being exposed by the Freedom of Information Act but W. Disney?
Nobody knew this (informant) except FBI and Disney himself. W. Disney wouldn't have done it even if he is alive. So the other possibility is it was leaked by FBI. Nobody can let the news published except FBI because it controls everything in US. They could deny it in the name of security. To reveal the identity of informant, even the informant had passed away, is against principle of intelligence. Then what made FBI betray its own principle? I puzzled.
The puzzle was resolved 9 years later by the news of Nixon's tape, It started :
Quote, "Saturday, 2 March, 2002, 03:05 GMT
Graham regrets Jewish slur
The Reverend Billy Graham has apologized for a taped conversation with former President Nixon in which he said the Jewish "stranglehold" of the media was ruining the United States and must be broken."
(see "295. Who controls D.O.J.? (3/7/05)")
Graham is a celebrity. Then I recalled W. Disney. He was a celebrity too. According to the news he was anti-semitic; anti-union; anti-communism. Which is the power that can humiliate him?
No wonder Sharon said, " We, the Jewish people, control America." It can force US celebrity apologizing to them. What about people passed away? They were humiliated.
It was not a coincidence that the negative news about Disney was released in 1993. At same period, a man became the CEO of Disneyland when his rival died in a helicopter accident. News said new CEO is a Jewish. Thirty years after Walter Disney's passing away, he was not only humiliated, his kingdom was also taken over by someone he disliked. It was a power show-off.
(I was blocked to post the new message a few minutes ago by error page. Since the persecution is intensified these days, a censorship may occur anytime.)
298. Intimidate Judge (3/22/05)
On 3/12, there was an article in Mercury News:"Potent medicine breaks probation for former judge"
Danser, a former judge of San Jose sentenced for fixing traffic tickets, was put into jail for violating probation rule. I had alleged he was a victim of regime change plot planned by Feds. (see 148, 169,170 and "171.Extort judge (10/16/03)")
The news said, "On March 4, just seven days from the end of his 90-day electronic monitoring, house-arrest sentence, he took the over-the-counter cough medicine. NyQuil contains so much alcohol - 25 percent - that it was specifically prohibited by Danser's house-arrest rules.
It was Danser's bad luck that a probation officer picked that very day to make a surprise 9;30 p.m. visit to his home. Danser's wife said her husband had a cold and was in bed. She was told to wake him up so he could give a urine sample to test."
The test was positive on alcohol so he went jail. Danser's lawyer said Danser had passed every previous visit from his probation officer and urine test. "The moral of this story is, if he gets sick, he goes to jail."
The surprise visit of probation officer was not a coincidence. It was planned. The whole event was a trap. I had experience. I think the bad cough was caused by radioactive contaminated food. Recently it is the most frequent method Feds using to poison my food. The case was used to intimidate other judges: if you don't obey, we can put you in jail.
What was Feds' demand this time? I think it's for a warrant. A normal one is easy to get. Only unreasonable search and arrest need intimidation.
299. Intrusion (3/22/05)
On 3/13, my brother and sister visited me. They would have a trip to China next month. As usual my brother in law drove me out for a food shopping. Other people stay at home. When I came back 2 hours later, they were not at home. Later they said they went to shopping in another store.
That night, my wife complained the leaking in rest-room. It was inside the cabinet which hold the basin. Though the cabinet is rarely used, I happened to use a plastic bowl stored inside it a day before. At that time it was still dry, now there was quite a lot of water in it. Someone checked the cabinet and damaged the water valve in the afternoon while I was not at home? I doubted.
Next day, my wife and daughter both complained the telephone didn't work. The telephone share the same socket with my computer. There are three connect wires, with different combination there are two function. One combination is a "convenient" one. With one plug in socket, both computer and telephone connected to line. The other combination is "inconvenient" one. When I go Internet, I must plug in computer wire. While if I using telephone, I must replace it with telephone wire manually. I use "inconvenient" combination because I think it is safer.
Someone changed it into "convenient" combination on 3/13 so when I replace the wire, telephone didn't work. Obviously my computer had been moved. Someone intrude my house when I was not at home. When they re-installed the computer, they changed the original combination. They damaged the water valve in rest room too.
They certainly had a search. They might installed some monitor device. But what worry me more is they might have plant something.
(This time I was blocked to post new message for more than 90 minutes. )
300. Garage door (3/27/05)
On 3/15, I got a letter from the Homeowners Association. It said the board of directors found I had a "broken garage door". The letter said that "Therefore, you are requested to: replace broken garage door and trim overgrown trees from house by April 17, 2005, or the board of directors will levy a $50.00 fine against you."
Obviously this is another case framed hurriedly by Feds. House inspection used to be taken every three months when it was in normal time. Since Feds occupied this community, there were rare architecture inspection. The latest one happened two years ago with an evil purpose. In later 2002 I was accused of the "garage paint too old". I even got a third notice after re-paint was done. They arranged a meeting for my complaint on 10/29/02. The date coincided with the departure date of a trip of my parents. I didn't attend the meeting because it was held in a residential house. I was afraid there might be an violence waiting for me. That house soon was sold after I wrote my allegation in Internet. See "95. A notice for a meeting (Oct. 2002)"
Same tactic repeats in amazing similarity. Feds uses Homeowners Association as a tool of persecution. They intimidate me with levying a fine. Last time it still followed the rule: fine levied after the failure of third notice. This time they threatened fine in first notice because they are in hurry. The framed case is planned done in April. The notice was filed on 3/14. What is the base for that final date of 4/17? It's a date not chosen by H.A. but by Feds. My relatives will be back to US on that day. They always arrange the case with a trip that will justify an accident or make a search reasonable.
On 3/12, newspaper reported former judge was in jail. The purpose was to intimidate others.
On 3/13, I was arranged for a food shopping when there was an intrusion. I allege there was a plant.
On 3/14, H.A. file a violence #1 notice, requested me to replace garage door.
All were done intensively in a sequence. I think Feds planted something illegal (most likely drugs) in my garage (or house). The agent will disguise as garage door contractor to carry out an unreasonable search which they had got the warrant from intimidated judge. To assure I will deal with a contractor of Feds, they also had an assistant operation.
On 3/18, Mercury News reported: "Unlicensed contractors get stung". 59 unlicensed builders were nabbed in an undercover sting operation. Those nabbed by the ruse were given criminal citations that could land them in jail for a maximum of six months, or they could be ordered to pay a $1,000 fine."
That's amazing similar to the event taken place in July 2003. When Feds tried to force me to have a roof contract with them, they created a roofing worker's death to intimidate other uninsured roofers out of the market. So the undercover contractor could get the deal. (see "145. SARS, a big issue(7/20/03)"










