part one of the negotiations in my opinion, involve,
acceptance of irans right of enrichment under strict guidelines and oversite of nuclear regulatory bodies.because this is irans right under international law.
what is negotiated ? a mirage in the desert , has the potential to hide,
a sandstorm in the making...
later i believe , the negotiations will attempt to link the falsity
of an given right under N.P.T. leading w/ the facade that enrichment activities were never acceptable. restated, 'we accept your right to enrich nuclear material.' ' so essentially , we gave you something ...( a right under nuclear reg. agencies) , that is not ours to give in opening talks...(hint-remember trading in stolen horses.) now, give us something in return. total access and israelian safety and security. above all else ,overshadowing greater regional needs and nuclear non-proliferation goals. in my opinion a key point to consider for an equitable resolution to N. P. T. issues.
Don't acquiesce to "conflict resolution." this is tangential, and
rewards israelian bad behavior. like , extrajudicial assassinations ,
embargoes that harm your citizens, and continued aggression
against the Palestinian people. from which they are not remorseful
or seeking any absolution. like an good neighbor should. right baby ?
indications of the well being between nations.
international relations are in complete reciprocity of existence.
direct negotiations and diplomacy are active. embassies and envoy's shuttle.
that being said, look at israelian past agreements , it's their 'modus operandi'
of future attempts at what they call...diplomacy. all are comprised of
non-aggression pacts that leave military interventionism intact.
ideally , one can aspire to achieve dipolmatically. unilateral and focused
stated goals of regional stability and non- proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. the initiative of the united states president Barack Hassein Obama .
disturbing treads have been revealed , as an additional source dissonance in
the negotiating process. 1) weakening Iran through acts of war. (embargoes )
2) assassination of Iranian scientists, at home and abroad.
3) dilution of the original goals of the talks. in a attempt to link a
non- aggression pact / or memorandum of understanding ,
that Iran is responsible for israelian well being from all external threats.
those include the trifecta . Hamas, Hezbollah , brotherhood . later,
radical Islamists , and the bedouin seeking rights in the sinai peninsula. Iran conceivably will be libel for everything . by interpretation of israelian law.
and well...that could mean anything.
like a good relationship sometimes introductions are necessary, other times ,
intermediaries cloud issues. I'd be accepting of israelian 3rd party attempts,
at diplomacy. but I'd try for direct negotiations , and I'd separate issues of regional goals w/ that of selfish motives of the few, to the detriment of all.
china understands this concept...










