humphreys wrote:Did you read the WIKI article?
Because it's the whole scientific world vs you right now as far as I can tell. Your objections make no sense and your definition of free-will is strange to say the least.
Anyway, I thought the experiment was interesting and I sense it's now time to move on as this discussion is going nowhere.
greeney2 wrote:A quote from you own links, as well as statements no concencous has been agreed on in this field!
"To be clear, no single study would disprove all forms of free will. This is because the term "free will" can encapsulate different hypotheses, each of which must be considered in light of existing empirical evidence."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests