< mohammed laughing
i think the conclusions drawn by billy although MAYBE extreme, are more fair than a jihadist with a fatwa.
when one considers that we haven't seen ANY other ethinic group CONTINUOUSLY hijack planes or threaten journalists, or attempt to assassinate anyone on the levels MUSLIMS have over the last few decades, i haven't even seen disgruntled defeated german NAZIS with this kind of concentrated insanity.
as soon a a wave of FINNISH geriatrics start doing the same, i'll say there is no issue.
meanwhile, profile THEM, and be on guard AGAINST them, and be prepared to FIGHT them. and in time, when i see some, or rather ANY of them stand up against ANY of their own, and they DON'T, and won't, then i'll give them equal respect.
ALL of europe is having to deal with these "people" on a frightening and harsh reality now. NOW. we're LUCKY, we have to deal with poor catholics from mexico, imagine waves of MUSLIMS. that is what THEY got NOW.
and in numbers, the Muslims are winning.
so. i'm with Billy on this.
too bad "they" and the "feel good" brotherly crowd doesn't like it.
but our "freedom" of religion" should NOT apply to "freedom of radical anti american zealots "and hide under protection of its citizens.
profile them. do not allow them their own laws. do not placate them under a guise of thwarting threatened reprisal.
do not give in to think that doing so will result in reasonable discourse.
and NO MOSQUE while the catholic church at ground zero is not allowed to be replaced.
i'm not religious per se. i have no church affiliation. i don't go to church. as far as i'm concerned, god is a speghetti monster..
but push my nose in muslim shlt, and i'm a crsading christian.
and i don't care who that offends.