The Black Vault Message Forums

Discover the Truth!        

General Discussion Topics

Julian Assange fails in bid to block extradition to Sweden

The Black Vault Message Forums has a considerable number of niche forums to place your post. If you can not find a home for it, and the topic doesn't fit anywhere else, then post it here.

Postby rath » Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:37 am

rath wrote:
greeney2 wrote:Or maybe find out he broke those backwards laws and find out he is a rapist in Sweden.


Maybe, but i think it would be a tough sell in Sweden.

Sweden ........

Were everything is legal .......... Porn, ... B & D, ... S & M, ... Orgy's, ... Hot tubs, ... bestiality,

In Sweden the age of consent is now 15 years old, raised from 12 years old in recent years. & for many decades Sweden did not even have a policy / law on the age of consent.

Thus sex with a minor & child exploitation was totally legal up until 1980.

When in 1980 Sweden outlawed sex with children aged between 1 day old & 12 years old, bestiality sky rocketed & remains high today.


greeney2 wrote:Or maybe find out he broke those backwards laws and find out he is a rapist in Sweden.



Sweden is ok with ... Porn, ... B & D, ... S & M, ... Swinging, ... Hot tubs, ... bestiality, sex with a minor & child exploitation.

But have consensual sex & the condom brakes & they charge you with RAPE.

OMG, backwards doesn't even begin to describe it.
Image
rath
 
Posts: 4344
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby rath » Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:39 am

rath wrote:
Watch on youtube.com



“CIA Honeytrap” Ardin Deleted Twitter Posts Praising Assange

http://www.infowars.com/cia-honeytrap-a ... g-assange/

http://twitter.com/#!/therealardin

Anna Ardin reveals the conspiracy against Julian Assange!

Anna Ardin Twitter account reveals conspiracy!

It is not good that Julian Assange be extradited to Sweden. It does not wait for justice without law decay. I can as European Lawyer with over 20 years of practical experience in Sweden confirm. Shortly before Anna Ardin police reported Assange of rape that would have occurred during the night from 14 to 15 August 2010 in Sweden ruined her micro-blogging on Twitter. Although the cache on her tweets have been removed by a conspiratorial hands. But some genius has yet succeeded in restoring her tweets:

August 14, she writes at. 14.00:

Julian wants to go to a crayfish party, someone who has a few seats available tonight electricity tomorrow? # fb
From the twitter of Anna Ardin
· 5 days ago · Comment

At. 02:00 on the morning of 15 Aug, ie after the alleged rape, she writes:
Sunday, August 15

Sitting out here at 2am and just freeze with the world’s coolest smartest people, that’s amazing! # fb From the twitter of Anna Ardin · 5 days ago · Comment

Would you write like this if you just got raped? And why did she delete her twitter posts?



http://reinep.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/ ... n-assange/
Image
rath
 
Posts: 4344
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby rath » Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:40 am

rath wrote:Only because it is what it is. Cant change it.

Im not sure i would have done the same as for all he knows it's just a trap.

The USA & Ecuador also have an extradition treaty in place.

So he may have just made things worse for him self.



2nd.

The Issue of Flight is really a minor issue, that's why i did not comment on it.

What i dont get is why you would make a big deal about it.


A. Julian Assange breached his bail.

B. The USA wants Julian Assange DEAD. has pushed for his extradition & or Assassination.

C. Sweden has charged Julian assange with Rape When there was no rape.

D. Swedish prosecutors dismiss the charges of assault against Assange after it was proved the two Swedish woman were lying.

E. the Swedish prosecutors who dismissed the original charges, had their decision overturned by their senior department heads who wanted Julian Assange arrested, so a new crime was made up & julian Assange was charged a second time.

F. The new charges of rape against julian Assange, was not even a crime at the time Julian Assange had sex with the woman in question.

G. The crime of have consensual sex, & the condom breaking mid coitus, waqs not even a crime at the time of the act between julian assange and the women in question.

H. Julian Assange will be the FIRST person in Swedish / world history to ever be charged with this crime.

I. the law in question, was not even a law at the time the sex act took place. & the New Swedish law that Julian Assange see him self as the first person in history ever to be charged under the new law, is not a retrospective law.

J. Because the law is not a retrospective law Julian Assage can not be found to have been in breach of it.

K. The USA convened a grand Jury regarding the Extradition / Assassination of Julian Assange , yet the grand jury refuses to hand down its verdict until Julian Assange is in Swedish custody

L. Question.

If julian Assange did not break any Swedish laws at the time the alleged act took place then why does he need to be extradited to Sweden to face court.

If there's no crime he can be charged with, why does he need to return to Sweden.



Another Question.

If Sweden seeks to Arrest julian Assange, Why did Sweden Pass laws regarding freedom of the press, designed to protect Julian Assange & WikiLeaks In the Hope of persuading Julian Assange to move Wikileaks from its base of operations in Australia & set wikileaks up in Sweden making Sweden famous as the home town of wikileaks.



What happened that Sweden went from passing laws to Protect Julian Assange & Wikileaks To the Current situation where they now seek to destroy him.


When Sweden embraced Julian Assange & Wikileaks & Wikileaks Published the Classified US documents & Videos,
Under the Protection of the Swedish laws .......... Hmm i wonder What the US senet & congress have down to push sweden in this direction .. hmmmm.

Greenwald wrote:The evidence that the US seeks to prosecute and extradite Assange is substantial. There is no question that the Obama justice department has convened an active grand jury to investigate whether WikiLeaks violated the draconian Espionage Act of 1917. Key senators from President Obama's party, including Senate intelligence committee chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, have publicly called for his prosecution under that statute. A leaked email from the security firm Stratfor – hardly a dispositive source, but still probative – indicated that a sealed indictment has already been obtained against him. Prominent American figures in both parties have demanded Assange's lifelong imprisonment, called him a terrorist, and even advocated his assassination.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... sfeed=true
Image
rath
 
Posts: 4344
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby rath » Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:41 am

rath wrote:
Watch on youtube.com
Image
rath
 
Posts: 4344
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby rath » Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:46 am

rath wrote:http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/mediagrid.htm
Image
rath
 
Posts: 4344
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby rath » Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:47 am

rath wrote:STRATFOR EMAILS:

STRATFOR SYDNEY BASED WATCH OFFICER CHRIS FARNHAM CONNECTION TO SWEDISH WOMAN IN ASSANGE CASE

Tuesday 28th February 2012 23:00 GMT

On February 27, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the private intelligence organization Stratfor, a US company based in Texas. Confidential emails obtained from the US private intelligence firm, Stratfor, reveal that the firm’s Sydney based watch officer, says he has connections with a friend of one of the Swedish women in the Assange case.

In a late 2010 email exchange with George Friedman, Stratfor CEO and founder, Farnham writes, "BTW, close family friend in Sweden who knows the girl that is pressing charges tells me that there is absolutely nothing behind it other than prosecutors that are looking to make a name for themselves. My friend speaks rather disparagingly about the girl who is claiming molestation. I also think the whole rape thing is incorrect for if I remember correctly rape was never the charge." (1657727)

Farnham elaborates in another email: "If it really matters I can look into it, but from what I am hearing that is not the case. That’s not to say that my friend is foolproof either. She knows nothing of law or politics, she just knows the girl in question and follows the news." (1681746)

Assange has not been indicted in the Swedish case, but recently released emails have revealed that the United States Government has had a secret inditement against the WikiLeaks founder for more than twelve months: "Not for Pub — We have a sealed indictment on Assange. Pls protect." (375123)

A few weeks earlier, following Julian Assange’s release from a London jail, where he had been remanded as a result of a Swedish prosecutor’s arrest warrant, Fred Burton, Stratfor’s Vice-President for Counterterrorism and Corporate Security, and a former Deputy Chief of the Department of State’s (DoS) counterterrorism division for the Diplomatic Security Service (DSS), told SkyNews: "extradition [to the US is] more and more likely". (373862).

Moreover, the bilateral agreement between the United States and Sweden allows Julian Assange to be extradited to the US as soon as he arrives in Sweden.

Sweden has not opposed an extradition to the US since 2000.

Julian Assange has been under house arrest for 448 days with no charge, since he was released from solitary confinement at Wandsworth prison in the UK on 7 December 2010. He awaits a ruling on his extradition appeal v. the Swedish Judicial Authority which was heard before the UK Supreme Court’s on February 1 and 2, 2012.

Assange’s appeal questioned whether the Swedish prosecutor, who issued the European Arrest Warrant, can claim to be called a ’judicial authority.’ As Geoffrey Robertson QC, Australian born human rights lawyer, has argued: "The notion that a prosecutor is a ’judicial authority’ is a contradiction in terms."

The decision to issue a European Arrest Warrant (EAW) and an INTERPOL Red Notice for the purpose of questioning a person, fully cooperating with authorities is highly suspect, as is the refusal of the Swedish prosecutor to interview Assange in London, as has been offered, and since doing so would be in accordance with the rules set forth under the terms of Mutual Legal Assistance.

At a February 7 and 8, 2011 hearing on the extradition case, Assange’s lawyers also argued that the UK should not extradite him to Sweden because Assange would not face a fair trial.

If extradited to Sweden, Assange will not be judged by an ’independent and impartial tribunal’, a fundamental requirement under the European Convention of Human Rights (article 61.) Three out of the four judges are lay judges, appointed by political parties with no formal, legal training.

On December 08, 2010 The Independent, a UK newspaper, reported that Sweden and the United States were already holding informal negotiations about Assange’s onward extradition. (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...))

On February 20, 2011, Louis Susman, US Ambassador to the UK said in a BBC interview with Andrew Marr, "[A]t this point in time, we have brought no action against Mr. Assange and we will have to see how it plays out in the British court."
Image
rath
 
Posts: 4344
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby rath » Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:48 am

rath wrote:STRATFOR EMAILS:

STRATFOR SYDNEY BASED WATCH OFFICER CHRIS FARNHAM CONNECTION TO SWEDISH WOMAN IN ASSANGE CASE

Tuesday 28th February 2012 23:00 GMT

On February 27, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the private intelligence organization Stratfor, a US company based in Texas. Confidential emails obtained from the US private intelligence firm, Stratfor, reveal that the firm’s Sydney based watch officer, says he has connections with a friend of one of the Swedish women in the Assange case.

In a late 2010 email exchange with George Friedman, Stratfor CEO and founder, Farnham writes, "BTW, close family friend in Sweden who knows the girl that is pressing charges tells me that there is absolutely nothing behind it other than prosecutors that are looking to make a name for themselves. My friend speaks rather disparagingly about the girl who is claiming molestation. I also think the whole rape thing is incorrect for if I remember correctly rape was never the charge." (1657727)

Farnham elaborates in another email: "If it really matters I can look into it, but from what I am hearing that is not the case. That’s not to say that my friend is foolproof either. She knows nothing of law or politics, she just knows the girl in question and follows the news." (1681746)

Assange has not been indicted in the Swedish case, but recently released emails have revealed that the United States Government has had a secret inditement against the WikiLeaks founder for more than twelve months: "Not for Pub — We have a sealed indictment on Assange. Pls protect." (375123)

A few weeks earlier, following Julian Assange’s release from a London jail, where he had been remanded as a result of a Swedish prosecutor’s arrest warrant, Fred Burton, Stratfor’s Vice-President for Counterterrorism and Corporate Security, and a former Deputy Chief of the Department of State’s (DoS) counterterrorism division for the Diplomatic Security Service (DSS), told SkyNews: "extradition [to the US is] more and more likely". (373862).

Moreover, the bilateral agreement between the United States and Sweden allows Julian Assange to be extradited to the US as soon as he arrives in Sweden.

Sweden has not opposed an extradition to the US since 2000.

Julian Assange has been under house arrest for 448 days with no charge, since he was released from solitary confinement at Wandsworth prison in the UK on 7 December 2010. He awaits a ruling on his extradition appeal v. the Swedish Judicial Authority which was heard before the UK Supreme Court’s on February 1 and 2, 2012.

Assange’s appeal questioned whether the Swedish prosecutor, who issued the European Arrest Warrant, can claim to be called a ’judicial authority.’ As Geoffrey Robertson QC, Australian born human rights lawyer, has argued: "The notion that a prosecutor is a ’judicial authority’ is a contradiction in terms."

The decision to issue a European Arrest Warrant (EAW) and an INTERPOL Red Notice for the purpose of questioning a person, fully cooperating with authorities is highly suspect, as is the refusal of the Swedish prosecutor to interview Assange in London, as has been offered, and since doing so would be in accordance with the rules set forth under the terms of Mutual Legal Assistance.

At a February 7 and 8, 2011 hearing on the extradition case, Assange’s lawyers also argued that the UK should not extradite him to Sweden because Assange would not face a fair trial.

If extradited to Sweden, Assange will not be judged by an ’independent and impartial tribunal’, a fundamental requirement under the European Convention of Human Rights (article 61.) Three out of the four judges are lay judges, appointed by political parties with no formal, legal training.

On December 08, 2010 The Independent, a UK newspaper, reported that Sweden and the United States were already holding informal negotiations about Assange’s onward extradition. (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...))

On February 20, 2011, Louis Susman, US Ambassador to the UK said in a BBC interview with Andrew Marr, "[A]t this point in time, we have brought no action against Mr. Assange and we will have to see how it plays out in the British court."
Image
rath
 
Posts: 4344
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby rath » Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:49 am

Feel free to address any of these, FACTS.

But, no doubt, you will do as you always do Greeney2.

& ignore sound evidence.
Image
rath
 
Posts: 4344
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby greeney2 » Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:43 am

rath wrote:
rath wrote:
Watch on youtube.com



“CIA Honeytrap” Ardin Deleted Twitter Posts Praising Assange

http://www.infowars.com/cia-honeytrap-a ... g-assange/

http://twitter.com/#!/therealardin

Anna Ardin reveals the conspiracy against Julian Assange!

Anna Ardin Twitter account reveals conspiracy!

It is not good that Julian Assange be extradited to Sweden. It does not wait for justice without law decay. I can as European Lawyer with over 20 years of practical experience in Sweden confirm. Shortly before Anna Ardin police reported Assange of rape that would have occurred during the night from 14 to 15 August 2010 in Sweden ruined her micro-blogging on Twitter. Although the cache on her tweets have been removed by a conspiratorial hands. But some genius has yet succeeded in restoring her tweets:

August 14, she writes at. 14.00:

Julian wants to go to a crayfish party, someone who has a few seats available tonight electricity tomorrow? # fb
From the twitter of Anna Ardin
· 5 days ago · Comment

At. 02:00 on the morning of 15 Aug, ie after the alleged rape, she writes:
Sunday, August 15

Sitting out here at 2am and just freeze with the world’s coolest smartest people, that’s amazing! # fb From the twitter of Anna Ardin · 5 days ago · Comment

Would you write like this if you just got raped? And why did she delete her twitter posts?



http://reinep.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/ ... n-assange/



Oh Please! Another cheesy made up video with mysterous music, and ridiculous presentation. We have seen thousands of this flavor crap for 911, Bush, and anti-amerian propaganda. :roll:
greeney2
 
Posts: 9687
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

Postby greeney2 » Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:56 am

rath wrote:Feel free to address any of these, FACTS.

But, no doubt, you will do as you always do Greeney2.

& ignore sound evidence.



The fact is you do not know diddilly poop what the facts are, yet you spout off, you know every move Assange made with 2 woman behind closed bedroom doors, let alone the facts of his involment with Manning. I'm perfectly willing to say nothing happened with the women, if the investigation finds that, and not up to you or me, to reinvent their laws, obvoiusly different than chovinist pigs like Assange are use to in Austrailia. Fact is his own wikileaks people tell about his womanizing.

Fact is, if we have 2 CIA operatives that close to Assange, do you really think we would waste our time, having them have sex with him, and concoct some ridiculous story about a rubber breaking? Or would they set him up for a full fledged violant rape, pump him full of drugs, and guarentee he will be finished??? Who is being stupid?
greeney2
 
Posts: 9687
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:54 am

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion Topics

  • View new posts
  • View unanswered posts
  • Who is online
  • In total there are 4 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 4 guests (based on users active over the past 10 minutes)
  • Most users ever online was 292 on Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:19 pm
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests