The Black Vault

Or maybe find out he broke those backwards laws and find out he is a rapist in Sweden.

greeney2 wrote:Or maybe find out he broke those backwards laws and find out he is a rapist in Sweden.

Maybe, but i think it would be a tough sell in Sweden.

Sweden ........

Were everything is legal .......... Porn, ... B & D, ... S & M, ... Orgy's, ... Hot tubs, ... bestiality,

In Sweden the age of consent is now 15 years old, raised from 12 years old in recent years. & for many decades Sweden did not even have a policy / law on the age of consent.

Thus sex with a minor & child exploitation was totally legal up until 1980.

When in 1980 Sweden outlawed sex with children aged between 1 day old & 12 years old, bestiality sky rocketed & remains high today.

greeney2 wrote:Or maybe find out he broke those backwards laws and find out he is a rapist in Sweden.

Sweden is ok with ... Porn, ... B & D, ... S & M, ... Swinging, ... Hot tubs, ... bestiality, sex with a minor & child exploitation.

But have consensual sex & the condom brakes & they charge you with RAPE.

OMG, backwards doesn't even begin to describe it.

rath wrote:But have consensual sex & the condom brakes & they charge you with RAPE.

Do all these condoms come with Standard drum brakes or disc brakes? Hope they don't break!

rath wrote:In Sweden the age of consent is now 15 years old, raised from 12 years old in recent years. & for many decades Sweden did not even have a policy / law on the age of consent.

Thus sex with a minor & child exploitation was totally legal up until 1980.

When in 1980 Sweden outlawed sex with children aged between 1 day old & 12 years old, bestiality sky rocketed & remains high today.

Do you need a law to tell you what would be right and wrong, with a child? Please tell me Austrailian men are not this ignorant Rath, to violate a 15 year old child.

greeney2 wrote:

rath wrote:In Sweden the age of consent is now 15 years old, raised from 12 years old in recent years. & for many decades Sweden did not even have a policy / law on the age of consent.

Thus sex with a minor & child exploitation was totally legal up until 1980.

When in 1980 Sweden outlawed sex with children aged between 1 day old & 12 years old, bestiality sky rocketed & remains high today.

Do you need a law to tell you what would be right and wrong, with a child? Please tell me Austrailian men are not this ignorant Rath, to violate a 15 year old child.

Hay ..... i nor my fellow Australian's are ignorant ...... That's why Australian's are fighting for Sweden to bring it's BACKWARDS LAWS, into the modern world.

REMEMBER .......

It is you Greeney2 who is defending Sweden's laws & their rights to do as they please.

greeney2 wrote:Bottom line is that Sweden's right to their own system, does not have to match the system of the UK, USA, or Austrailia.

Iv (( never defended Sweden's laws, )) or their right to have sex with animals, & their right to exploit children.

Greeney2, your & the American public, are the one who are defending Swedish law here mate.


So i guess the question should be ...........

Do you need a law to tell you what would be right and wrong, with a child / Animal ?
Please tell me American men are not this ignorant Greeney2,

Further points to come, stay tuned.

greeney2 wrote:Now you are finally getting it, your opinion doesn't mean anything, and now all you have to do is realize your opinions are from not understanding Swedish laws of rape, which are different from Austrailian laws. It was very simple, all Assange had to do was behave according to Swedish laws,

You mean the Swedish laws that say it's ok to

Buy, sell, watch, make all kinds of Porn, ... B & D, ... S & M, ... Orgy's, ... Hot tubs, ... bestiality, .... incest,
... Child Exploitation,

The law that sez it is OK to have sex with a 15 year old girl / boy, or both at the same time.



Again, keep in mind Greeney2 ..........

In Sweden the age of consent is now 15 years old, raised from 12 years old in recent years. & for many decades Sweden did not even have a policy / law on the age of consent, so sex with children aged between
1 day old & 15 years old, was very common & very except able.


REMEMBER .......

It is you Greeney2 who is defending Sweden's laws & their rights to do as they please.

greeney2 wrote:Bottom line is that Sweden's right to their own system, does not have to match the system of the UK, USA, or Austrailia.

Tell that to all the parents & children who have gone to Sweden over the past 60 years for a wonderful, once in a life time family holiday, Only to see their 1 day old - 15 year old child RAPED & SEXUALLY EXPLOITED.

Only to be told there is nothing that can be done as sex with a minor & Child exploitation, for personal pleasure & for XXX rated movies, is not illigal & is not even a crime in Sweden.

Would you tell them the same thing Greeney2.

greeney2 wrote:Bottom line is that Sweden's right to their own system, does not have to match the system of the UK, USA, or Austrailia.

How would you say it.

Sorry about your child being raped & exploited for prostitution & xxx rated child pornography,
But you should follow the Swedish laws & after all we did not tell you to bring your children to Sweden.

Or maybe somebody takes their 12 year old daughter to Sweden on a family holiday & an old Swedish man gets her drunk at one of the pubs in Sweden ( remember the age of consent is 123-15 in most city s / towns ) an after she is drunk he has sex with her. & a family holiday turns into a 12 year old girl going home to the USA or Australia or where ever ... with a pregnant 12 year old girl.

DO YOU TELL THEM THE SAME THINGS.

Tuff luck, But ...

greeney2 wrote:Bottom line is that Sweden's right to their own system, does not have to match the system of the UK, USA, or Austrailia.

greeney2 wrote:

rath wrote:But have consensual sex & the condom brakes & they charge you with RAPE.

Do all these condoms come with Standard drum brakes or disc brakes? Hope they don't break!

& do you really wanna play this game do you ....

OK.

On one had you critisize the laws as "backwards" for an Austrailan for mulitiple offences. Than you start defending the laws when an American sees your Austrialian hero, as a sexist pig. You just don't get it. By the way, this is a reputation Assange had long before, with his own circle of friends.

greeney2 wrote:On one had you critisize the laws as "backwards" for an Austrailan for mulitiple offences. Than you start defending the laws when an American sees your Austrialian hero, as a sexist pig. You just don't get it. By the way, this is a reputation Assange had long before, with his own circle of friends.

Not ...

You make no sense.

greeney2 wrote:Than you start defending the laws when an American sees your Austrialian hero, as a sexist pig. You just don't get it.

Um ...... No .......

Never did that.

greeney2 wrote:By the way, this is a reputation Assange had long before, with his own circle of friends.

& you would know this how.

let's just say you made that up & move past it.

No, I did not make it up, it was well publized during all this and a fact. Look it up for yourself, I could care less, his womanizing ways was well known. Deny all you like about this jerk, he is now running. If he is held up in the Ecudor embassy, that is flight, and should be arrested. He did not show up at the final Supreme Court Ruling, because he knew there would be a change of his being remanded into custody, for this very reason.

Fact Rath, you man of no character, is now attempting flight. If he is not available to authorities, and held up in the Embassy, he is definatly commiting "flight for the purpose of evading deportation" and running. Add one more crime to his list.