The Black Vault

Wing-Zero wrote:

Aquarian wrote:It was pretty enjoyable to say the least. The female leads (Gwyneth Paltrow and Scarlett Johanson) were forgettable though.

Scarlett Johanson turns everything she touches into gold. So I disagree.

Not to mention, the film slyly promoted privatization as the savior for the world's problems, furthering entrenched the cultural ideological apparatus so tied to American jingoism and corporate imperialism.

... That's kinda who Tony Stark is.

I guess Scarlet Johansson has an awe-effect on the average heterosexual male

And yeah, hence why Iron Man is one of my least favorite Marvel heroes. In the Civil War series, he is for the Mutant Registration Act because of his corporate ties to identification technologies, etc. Quite interesting.

Aquarian wrote:I guess Scarlet Johansson has an awe-effect on the average heterosexual male

Well, yeah, she's gorgeous.

I also think she's just a magnificent actress.

And yeah, hence why Iron Man is one of my least favorite Marvel heroes. In the Civil War series, he is for the Mutant Registration Act because of his corporate ties to identification technologies, etc. Quite interesting.

Ah, ok. Got'cha.

I thought you were surprised that the movie had that feeling throughout it.

Yeah msot girls are forgettable...

I still haven't seen the damn movie...

I also want to see Prince of Persia.

But too much money here and there.

Yeah Scarlett definitely has that effect on guys.
She is smoking hot.


I liked Iron Man 2 for what it was worth.
But yeah I know what you are talking about Aqua with the corp ties Iron man have tend to tie him to certain values. Not all of which are good.

Exactly. My main worry is that the corporatism reflected in the film was probably too glamourized despite real-world consequences regarding that corporatism.

I guess Scarlet Johansson has an awe-effect on the average heterosexual male

I guess Robert Downey Jr. had that affect on you. There is no hope for you!

He's a man's man!

I prefer the man around the man.

Man's man? lol guess he proved that in "Less then Zero".

shadowfx wrote:Man's man? lol guess he proved that in "Less then Zero".

Hmm, never seen it..