DIss0n80r wrote:Or you could be downplaying the importance of certain issues with a false choice between them
Actually, that's what the politicians do every election cycle which is what I was referring to. That is a correlation to the divisive tactic orangetom1999 and I were talking about. It wasn't off topic as you asked for an example.
DIss0n80r wrote:as if we can't tackle them all so we gotta dismiss the one that this thread just happens to be about
Yes, it's a grand conspiracy to derail your thread or it might just be that we're having a discussion and you aren't able to follow along.
DIss0n80r wrote:I find it strange you make time to post in here trivializing issues when you could be posting in a thread about terrorism or the NRA or Big Pharma or the Iluminati or something.
I find it strange that you feel I am not allowed to post here because you don't like my answers.
DIss0n80r wrote:right about when one side of the debate just happens to be losing ground.
What ground is being lost? I believe your beef is with Congress and lawmakers in general, not me.
DIss0n80r wrote:All important stuff, no doubt, but you won't find me in those threads persuading people to quit wasting their time on small stuff like human rights.
You seem to have a chip on your shoulder because John removed the subject heading and original post. It's a shame as that didn't used to happen around here but things change. You're obviously close to the subject, I understand that, but you obviously can't or won't respect anyone else's opinion on the matter unless it conforms to your own.
In other words, you're gay, we get it. However, you can't force the answer you want out of anyone no matter how many times you ask the same question.
The modern definition of ‘racist’ is someone who’s winning an argument with a liberal.