greeney2 wrote:Your "invention" of the term weak atheist is for yourself, not anyone of belief, to care about.
greeney2 wrote:Like I said, you can not be just a little pregnant, just ask Mrs H. about that one. Its pretty simple, either you believe or you don't!
greeney2 wrote:In my life, I always regarded an Atheist as "Just not believing in God", and an Agnostic as "Just not belonging to any specific religion".
greeney2 wrote:I really could care less about the strong or weak boloney, it doen't matter to anyone who is a believer.
Your idea about Babies is sad, and comparing them to objects and animals just shows what a mixed up, misguided souls you are. And you tell me something is wrong with me!
humphreys wrote:The reason we had to invent the term "Weak Atheist" is because people like you assume that atheism is automatically a direct claim to knowledge of the non-existence of God, which it isn't.
humphreys wrote:I don't really give a flying f*ck what you care about greeney, I was talking to qmark originally and you butted in like an obnoxious fool, so feel free to piss right off back out of the discussion you don't even care about
greeney2 wrote:humphreys wrote:The reason we had to invent the term "Weak Atheist" is because people like you assume that atheism is automatically a direct claim to knowledge of the non-existence of God, which it isn't.
REad your own words Humphreys, "We had to invent-------".
greeney2 wrote:Why would I argue with Qmark who said it perfectly, Strong or weak, its nothing but word games. In short--just plain stupid!
greeney2 wrote:As for your tone, I know when I strike a nerve with you! I could care less about it, meaning its not an issue to me, its only an issue to you, the strong/weak nonsense.
greeney2 wrote:Why would anyone care, as you declare you do not believe in God, if you are weak or strong about it???
greeney2 wrote:Its as stupid as not understanding the coorelation of saying "I'm only a little bit pregnant"--there is no such thing. I'll butt in anytime I feel like posting something, which us usually when you say something dumb, unfortunaltly is most of the time, comparing your newborn child with a lampshade or pet cat.
humphreys wrote:I don't get the issue you guys are having. Weak atheists make different claims to Strong atheists, so we differentiate between them just as we differentiate between Christians who have different beliefs about the Bible.
greeney2 wrote:What you are saying is agnostics, and weak atheists are lesser none believers and the same, somewhere in the middle of being a Strong atheist, and someone who believes in God
greeney2 wrote:, however you are adament the believer is wrong, yet still claim a middle position?
greeney2 wrote:You clearly favor the strong atheism side, and clearly reject all of the believer side.
greeney2 wrote:Either you are a believer or not a believer, that is the middle ground, not strong/weak atheism. That is why to any believer, the strong/weak terminology is relevant only to you.
greeney2 wrote:Page 1 my first comments were stating all Christians agree on the fact Jesus is the Son of God, and Died on the cross for us. Do you have any answer to that, becasue you skipped right past it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests