Orange tom wrote:
The Children of Israel were given these specific patterns to show that they were different from the World ...from the nations surrounding them. A peculear peoples.
In this manner ..the children of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the children of the free woman.
Todays intelligence, gnostic wise men are laying the groundwork for the children of the bondwoman to be heir with the children of free woman. And many of these are preachers who should know better.
So too it is with the Christians of today.
I am not an Ishmaelite.
Neither am I Orangetom however I see it a bit more differently.
The pope of Rome and the Vatican have a permanent seat at the United Nations. The Catholic Church is the only church to have such a seat as a religious organization.
I beleive that the Vatican is the extension of the Romain empire and controls the world and influence world wide leaders. Nothing is done without more or less the approval of the holy see.
I beleive that the holy see and the united nations are very well planning a one world government and a one world religion.
When the pope Jean Paul 2 kiss the Koran and the Hindu Godless Shiva it was not for nothing.
The Vatican wants to be head of the one world religion and have all other religion under his thumb
City of London + City of Vatican + City of Columbia are the 3 independent states within states which composes the empire of the city. The first is financial control over earth economy, the second is religion control over the earth and the third one is military control over the earth. Together they make the very unholy trinity which forms the Egyptian pyramid that we can see on the back of the privately owned federal reserve note that is used as American dollar to maintain the colony in debt and under the Queen.
Many people realize that this mystifying situation, in which an alleged democratic and self-governing nation is actually controlled against the will of the people, is a clear indication that there must be a very powerful and well-financed occult organization which plans and directs world affairs, and for lack of a more specific identification this suspected secret organization is popularly referred to as the International Financiers, Banksters cartel or "The Crown corporation".
I think you will find the two following videos very interesting.
This film makes the link, all the way from ancient Egypt and its god Am-on (amen) (the only one) to the current day people in charge of the world (the bloodline).
It all culminates in London, with the Queen not the the Crown ( not the Queen but the Crown which is the financial control system of a few families and the black nobility controlling the trade, in Rome, with the pope and the control of the spiritual, and in Washington DC, with the control of the military might. All of this people would still carry the blood (genes) of the Hebrew elite that once ruled over Egypt, mixed with the most powerful roman emperor and explains in her view why the Zionists rule the world.
This theory seems to justify the masonic tradition that claims that a bloodline is indeed going back all the way to the times of Egypt and (for some) all the way to Atlantean times.
First of all, it's interesting that the documentary equates the Hebrews with the Hyksos, the 'Shepherd Kings', who only ruled over the delta area of ancient Egypt; lower to middle Egypt.
In the writings of Josephus, who did believe that the Hyksos and the Hebrews were the same people.
The main Egyptian resistance to the Hyksos was centred in Thebes, and yes, the Egyptians did succeed in finally driving the Hyksos out.
Henk Ruyssenaars explain the real meaning of the term "City of London" The following is an excerpt from that article.
"To the majority of people the words "Crown" and "City" in reference to London refer to the queen or the capital of England.
This is not the truth. The "City" is in fact a privately owned Corporation - or Sovereign State - occupying an irregular rectangle of 677 acres and located right in the heart of the 610 square mile 'Greater London' area. The population of 'The City' is listed at just over four thousand, whereas the population of 'Greater London' (32 boroughs) is approximately seven and a half million.
"The Crown" is a committee of twelve to fourteen men who rule the independent sovereign state known as London or 'The City.' 'The City' is not part of England. It is not subject to the Sovereign. It is not under the rule of the British parliament. Like the Vatican in Rome, it is a separate, independent state.
"The City", which is often called "the wealthiest square mile on earth," is ruled over by a Lord Mayor. Here are grouped together Britain's great financial and commercial institutions: Wealthy banks, dominated by the privately-owned (Rothschild controlled) Bank of England, Lloyd's of London, the London Stock Exchange, and the offices of most of the leading international trading concerns. Here, also, is located Fleet Street, the heart and core of the newspaper and publishing worlds.
The Lord Mayor, who is elected for a one year stint, is the monarch in the City. As Aubrey Menen says in "London", Time-Life, 1976, p. 16:
When the Queen of England goes to visit the City she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple Bar, the symbolic gate of the City. She bows and asks for permission to enter his private, sovereign State. During such State visits
"the Lord Mayor in his robes and chain, and his entourage in medieval costume, outshines the royal party, which can dress up no further than service uniforms."
The Lord Mayor leads the queen into his city.
The symbolism is clear. The Lord Mayor is the monarch. The Queen is his subject.
The small clique who rule the City dictate to the British Parliament. It tells them what to do, and when. In theory Britain is ruled by a Prime Minister and a Cabinet of close advisers. These 'fronts' go to great lengths to create the impression that they are running the show but, in reality, they are mere puppets whose strings are pulled by the shadowy characters who dominate behind the scenes. As the former British Prime Minister of England during the late 1800s Benjamin D'Israeli wrote:
"So you see... the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes"
It is important to recognize the fact that two separate empires were operating under the guise of the British Empire. One was the Crown Empire and the other the British Empire.
The colonial possessions that were white were under the sovereign - i.e. under the authority of the British government. Such nations as the Union of South Africa, Australia, New Zealand and Canada were governed under British law. These only represented thirteen percent of the people who made up the inhabitants of the British Empire.
All the other parts of the British Empire - nations like India, Egypt, Bermuda, Malta, Cyprus and colonies in Central Africa, Singapore, Hong Kong and Gibraltar were all Crown Colonies. These were not under British rule. The British parliament had no authority over them.
As the Crown owned the committee known as the British government there was no problem getting the British taxpayer to pay for naval and military forces to maintain the Crown's supremacy in these areas.
The City reaped fantastic profits from its operations conducted under the protection of the British armed forces. This wasn't British commerce and British wealth. The international bankers, prosperous merchants and those members of the aristocracy who were part of the "City" machine accumulated vast fortunes .
...."financiers in reality took upon themselves, perhaps not the responsibility, but certainly the power of controlling the markets of the world and therefore the numerous relationships between one nation and another, involving international friendship and mistrusts... Loans to foreign countries are organized and arranged by the City of London with no thought whatsoever of the nation's welfare but solely in order to increase indebtedness upon which the City thrives and grows rich..."
In "Empire of the City" E. C. Knuth said:
" This national amend mainly international dictatorship of money which plays off one country against another and which, through ownership of a large portion of the press converts the advertisement of its own private opinion into a semblance of general public opinion, cannot for much longer be permitted to render Democratic Government a mere nickname. Today we see through a glass darkly: for there is so much which it would not be in the public interest to divulge."...http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 3139148549http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4w-A54h_GQ8