By ADAM KLASFELD
MANHATTAN (CN) - A reporter sued the National Archives and Records Administration for refusing to release information about how former President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney tried to shape public opinion during their time in office.
John Cook, a reporter for Gawker Media, made modest requests, which the government rejected. He did not seek government records, but records of who sought records."NARA has indicated that it is currently in possession of more than 10,000 pages of documentation related to special access requests by Designated Representatives and Other Officials for records of former President George W. Bush and former Vice President Dick Cheney," according to his lengthy federal FOIA complaint.
"John Cook, a staff journalist for Gawker Media, made a request under FOIA for copies of these special access requests and related correspondence. Mr. Cook does not seek the Administration's documents, which are protected from disclosure under the PRA [Presidential Records Act]; rather, he seeks only records of which designated representatives and other officials sought and were or were not granted access to what Administration documents.
"Mr. Cook seeks these records in order to gain insight into the way in which the former President and Vice President have chosen to shape the public's perception of their time in office, and to provide this insight to the public through online news stories," the complaint states. (Italics, but not brackets, in original.)
Cook made his first FOIA request on Oct. 21, 2010, and Uncle Sam denied much of it one month later. The denial letter stated that "special access requests" are subject to a FOIA exemption to prevent invasion of privacy.
Cook appealed the denial on Jan. 3, arguing that the government could not withhold an entire document because it could readily redact '"information that could allow readers to identify the requesters in any special access request correspondence while releasing records concerning subject areas, terms of access, and other data of potential interest to the public."
Two months later, the government told him his appeal would be delayed "due to the volume of material ... and the need to coordinate with two components within NARA."
The letter estimated that his request covered about 7,500 pages, according to the complaint.
Cook says the government partly granted appeal in June, revising the estimated responsive documents to 10,000 pages.
Though he says he mailed a check for copying expenses later that month, he says he still has not received a page. He wants to see the documents.
He is represented by Charles Sims with Proskauer Rose.
Eldensword wrote 470 Days Ago (neutral)0The funny thing about "We", the masses aren't capable of handling the facts that the elite are facing regarding our reality. "We" will be left out and only the select will be let in. Plain and simple.1 point wnettles wrote 515 Days Ago (positive)1OH, my goodness! Is there some documents that our government does not want us to see? Yeah, we are the ones that paid for the paper that the documents are printed on, and, we paid for the ink to print them, and, we paid for the salaries of all those involved with the documents. But, heck, who are we to ask to see the results of our taxes?1 point
There is a group of people in America that may be more committed to prying documents from the government than just about anyone else
When Barack Obama ran for president in 2008, his pledges of openness and transparency were not ancillary to his campaign but central to it.
After almost 40 years of investigating the shrouded history of UFOs throughout North America, Grant Cameron is getting some recognition.