| |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| |
| Author |
Message |
IAM1
B.V. Info-a-holic
Joined: Sep 01, 2006
Posts: 5474
|
 Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:44 am Post subject: SECRET PLAN TO KILL THE "FREE INTERNET" BY 2012 |
 |
|
| |
Corporations Plan To Pull Plug On The Free Internet
Web users naive about agenda to turn Internet into regulated cable TV model
[This is yet another example of corrupt government allowing corporations to profit by allowing them to take away freedom from the people and impose regulations and spying techniques on citizens for profit, power, and many additional deceptive practices!]
June 12, 2008
Paul Watson
The Internet is the last true unregulated outpost of freedom of speech but moves are afoot to stifle, suffocate, control and eventually pull the plug on the world wide web as we know it. These threats are not hidden nor are they hard to deduce and yet a significant number of Internet users remain naive as to their scope.
Despite many questioning the authenticity of a report that claimed ISP's had resolved to restrict the Internet to a TV-like subscription model where users will be forced to pay to visit selected corporate websites by 2012, while others will be blocked, the march towards regulation of the web is clear and documented.
We have been warning about the plan to let the old Internet die and replace it with a restricted and controlled Internet 2 for years. In 2006, we published an article about how the RIAA were attempting to broaden intellectual property distinctions to a point whereby merely linking to external content is judged as copyright infringement.
http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/
Recording Industry vs. The People
At the time, the article was met with a mixed response. Many were aware of the imminent dangers that threaten to change the face of the Internet but others were more hostile to the supposition that the world wide web could be devastated by landmark copyright case rulings as well as plans to develop "Internet 2."
Some accused us of yellow journalism and scaremongering yet the warning that the Elektra vs. Barker case could criminalize the very mechanism that characterizes the Internet was not concocted by Alex Jones or Paul Joseph Watson, it was a statement made by the very lawyer fighting the case, Ray Beckerman.
It was a danger also reported on by one of the UK's biggest technology news websites, the Inquirer, which also highlighted the frightening development in an article entitled, RIAA wants the Internet shut down.
http://www.theinquirer.net/en/inquirer/news/2006/11/29/riaa-wants-the-internet-shut-down
RIAA wants the Internet shut down - The INQUIRER
The RIAA's argument was that defendant Tenise Barker downloaded music files and made them available for distribution by placing them in a shared folder. Though Barker paid for the files and downloaded them legally, and the files were not copied by anyone, the RIAA's motion states that simply making the files available constitutes copyright infringement.
As Beckerman points out, the entire Internet is nothing more than a giant network of hyperlinks making files 'available' to other people. If we link to CNN.com, we are making the file that constitutes the CNN homepage 'available' to other users. We don't own the copyright to any of CNN's material therefore if the RIAA's argument is accepted, by simply making that CNN file available from our website, even if no one clicks on the link, we are committing a breach of copyright.
At no point in our article did we suggest that the ruling definitely would shut down the Internet, we highlighted the fact that hundreds of transnational corporations like Amazon.com who solely rely on Internet trade would scream bloody murder. But what the ruling would grease the skids for is the move towards a strictly regulated Internet whereby government permission would be required to run a website and that website would be subject to censoring and deletion if it violated any "terms of use."
This wouldn't be much of a problem to giant transnational corporations, because their websites would remain accessible for everyone. Yet for thousands of political websites and blogs, the plug could be effectively pulled.
After a long legal fight, Elektra vs. Barker was decided largely in Elektra's favor, after a federal judge essentially validated the RIAA's position that having songs available in a KaZaA shared folder violates the distribution right under the Copyright Act.
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080331-new-ruling-may-grease-the-wheels-of-riaa-litigation-machine.html
New ruling may "grease the wheels" of RIAA litigation machine
The example that we cite in discussing what life would be like under "Internet 2" was that running a blog would be like having a You Tube account - any politically sensitive or controversial information that the owners dislike would immediately be removed as it is frequently on You Tube.
In addition, the slide towards a licensed Internet that will be sold using fear of identity and credit card fraud could lead to mandatory biometric thumb or finger scanning simply to access the world wide web.
This is hardly a stretch of the imagination, since numerous public services and functions of society are increasingly accessible only through providing some form of biometric identification. Credit passes for travel, ATM terminals and access to theme parks like Disneyland are just a few of the many services we use that are shifting towards mandatory biometric gatekeeping.
Furthermore, Pay By Touch Online and other companies have already developed and launched keyboard biometric finger scanning terminals that require users to submit their biometric print before they can access the Internet or buy online.
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/02-06-2006/0004275205&EDATE=
Convenience and Security of Finger Identification Comes to Internet Consumers Through New Pay By Touch Online Service
Piggybacking the net neutrality debate, Internet 2 is being shaped to replace the old Internet, which will be allowed to self-destruct as it labors under the pressures of being relegated to slower and slower pipes and users will simply desert a painstaking system.
More than two years ago in an article entitled, The End of the Internet?, The Nation magazine reported,
"The nation's largest telephone and cable companies are crafting an alarming set of strategies that would transform the free, open and nondiscriminatory Internet of today to a privately run and branded service that would charge a fee for virtually everything we do online."
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060213/chester
The End of the Internet?
Watch these 2 short videos on Net Neutrality (internet freedom) here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9jHOn0EW8U
YouTube - Net Neutrality
Here's what you need to do to stop corporations from taking away free internet:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSU2jtNVO3w&feature=related
YouTube - Net Neutrality
"Verizon, Comcast, Bell South and other communications giants are developing strategies that would track and store information on our every move in cyberspace in a vast data-collection and marketing system, the scope of which could rival the National Security Agency. According to white papers now being circulated in the cable, telephone and telecommunications industries, those with the deepest pockets--corporations, special-interest groups and major advertisers--would get preferred treatment. Content from these providers would have first priority on our computer and television screens, while information seen as undesirable, such as peer-to-peer communications, could be relegated to a slow lane or simply shut out."
Internet 2 is being billed as the next generation of the world wide web and it has already set global speed records in terms of data transfer, far outstripping the old Internet. [You see how they use marketing to tempt people into giving up their liberties? Don't fall for this folks, because ending the free internet will only create profit for corporations who will gladly submit all of your personal information to the shadow government. They don't care about your privacy, they only want to make a profit and gain more power over us all!]
http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3403161
InternetNews Realtime IT News - Scientists Set Internet2 Speed Record
One of the fathers of the Internet, David Clark, who served as chief protocol architect for the government's internet development initiative in the 1980s, has been given $200,000 by the National Science Foundation to covertly work on a "whole new infrastructure to replace today's global network," according to Wired Magazine.
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/news/2005/06/68004
Net Pioneer Wants New Internet
Clark has vowed to create a "brave new world" in designing the new Internet, characterizing what he wanted for the new network to be "a coherent security architecture."
Dovetailing the onset of Internet 2 are government propaganda campaigns to demonize the existing Internet as a wild backwater for hate crime, child pornography and a terrorist recruiting ground.
Establishment kingpins and their cheerleaders have increased their level of vitriolic rhetoric against the Internet in recent years , as legislation in both the U.S. and Europe to regulate, stifle and license the Internet moves forward.
The White House's own recently de-classified strategy for "winning the war on terror" targets Internet conspiracy theories as a recruiting ground for terrorists and threatens to "diminish" their influence.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2006/070906terroristrecruiters.htm
White House Targets Conspiracy Theorists As Terrorist Recruiters
In addition, the Pentagon recently announced its effort to infiltrate the Internet and propagandize for the war on terror.
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Raw_obtains_CENTCOM_email_to_bloggers_1016.html
The Raw Story | Raw obtains CENTCOM email to bloggers
In an October 2006 speech, Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff identified the web as a "terror training camp," through which "disaffected people living in the United States" are developing "radical ideologies and potentially violent skills."
Chertoff pledged to dispatch Homeland Security agents to local police departments in order to aid in the apprehension of domestic terrorists who use the Internet as a political tool.
The European-Union, led by former Stalinist and potential future British Prime Minister John Reid, has also vowed to shut down "terrorists" who use the Internet to spread propaganda.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6081850.stm
BBC NEWS | UK | UK Politics | Anti-terror plan targets internet
The dangers to the freedom and very existence of the Internet as we know it are all too real and the way to counteract these developments is to get involved and get the word out. Simply burying our heads in the sand and being apathetic and naive about the threat is only going to aid those who wish to see the last outpost of freedom of speech shut off forever. [Watch the 2 short videos in this article on net neutrality to find out what you can do to stop this internet invasion and corporate shadow government takeover.] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Author |
Message |
weepingwillow
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Apr 04, 2008
Posts: 635
Location: U.S.A., Tennessee
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 3:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080614/ap_on_hi_te/yahoo_fallout_8
Google grows stronger in Microsoft-Yahoo fallout By MICHAEL LIEDTKE, AP Business Writer
Sat Jun 14, 2:05 AM ET
SAN FRANCISCO - Microsoft Corp.'s abandoned takeover bid for Yahoo Inc. appears to have culminated with a disheartening thud for those two companies but amounted to yet another coup for online search leader Google Inc.
ADVERTISEMENT
What began in January as Microsoft's most audacious attack yet on Google instead paved the way for the Internet's most powerful company to gain even more clout through a deal that gives Google access to a large chunk of Yahoo's advertising space.
By submitting to a partnership that endorses Google's search advertising technology as a better choice than its own, Yahoo is giving online marketers even more incentive to spend most of their money with its biggest rival, according to industry analysts.
It looks like such a sweet deal for Google that the U.S. Justice Department and lawmakers are expected to take a hard look at the arrangement to make sure it doesn't give Google too much control over the Internet's search advertising market.
Google currently has about 75 percent of the U.S. search advertising market followed by Yahoo at 9 percent, according to the research firm eMarketer Inc.
Although they contend their alliance won't lessen competition, Google and Yahoo have agreed to wait until late September to begin working together so the U.S. government has more time to assess the potential impact.
Even more importantly to Google, the Yahoo partnership keeps a potentially valuable weapon out of Microsoft's control.
Without Yahoo's renowned franchise, Microsoft once again is scrambling to find a way to fix its unprofitable online operations and narrow Google's commanding lead in the Internet's rapidly growing ad market.
Google shares gained $18.56 to close Friday at $571.51 while Microsoft shares added 83 cents to close at $29.07 — an indication that some investors were relieved the world's largest software maker concluded it would be too expensive and troublesome to buy Yahoo.
On the other side of the fence, Yahoo shareholders had been clinging to the possibility that Microsoft would revive its last offer of $47.5 billion, or $33 per share, to buy the Internet pioneer. But those hopes evaporated late Thursday after Yahoo disclosed Microsoft had "unequivocally" rebuffed an attempt to renew the negotiations.
In a sign of investors' frustration, Yahoo shares dropped as much as $1.77, or 7.5 percent, Friday before rallying late in the session to finish at $23.47, down five cents. The downturn marked Yahoo's lowest stock price since it closed at $19.18 at the end of January, just before Microsoft launched its takeover attempt.
That leaves Yahoo's market value 29 percent below Microsoft's last offer, which was withdrawn May 3 after Yahoo asked for $37 per share. Yahoo's stock hasn't reached that price since January 2006.
At least Microsoft still has a strong, highly profitable backbone — a suite of software products that run most computers around the world.
Yahoo, though, may have made a Faustian bargain by hiring Google to show ad links next to a significant portion of the ad links appearing alongside search results on its Web site in the United States and Canada. The Sunnyvale-based company also will pluck Google ads to show on other Web sites in its marketing network.
Yahoo expects its annual revenue to get an $800 million lift from the arrangement with Google while still showing show the majority of its own ads alongside its own search results. But most analysts viewed it as an act of desperation, asserting it's only a matter of time before advertisers shift all their business to Google because they know their messages will show up on Yahoo either way.
Deutsche Bank analyst Jeetil Patel described Yahoo's decision to farm out advertising to Google as "one of the worst strategic maneuvers seen in the Internet industry."
Google will get such great access to Yahoo's highly trafficked Web site that it should be able to gather more insights about the correlation between search requests and advertising, ThinkPanmure analyst William Morrison wrote in a Friday research note titled "Giving Away The Store (To Google)."
And that additional data could help Google further improve its advertising formula to become an even more compelling marketing magnet.
The partnership also cast doubt on a turnaround plan Yahoo co-founder Jerry Yang began drawing up year ago after he replaced Terry Semel as the Sunnyvale-based company's chief executive.
A big part of that strategy hinged on Yahoo becoming a "must-buy" for advertisers — a strategy that the Google deal appears to contradict.
"This raises very important questions about the long-term vision for (Yahoo) and its place in the industry," said Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Derek Brown.
Yahoo shareholders will get a chance to vent their frustration at the company's annual meeting Aug. 1 when activist investor Carl Icahn will seek to replace the board with nine alternate candidates.
Icahn was primarily interested in selling Yahoo to Microsoft, so his campaign to replace the board may be hurt if he can't persuade shareholders he has other viable ideas on how to boost Yahoo's stock price. He didn't return a call seeking comment Friday.
Yang and his top lieutenant, Susan Decker, defended the Google deal as a profitable move that will better position the company to capitalize on the Internet advertising market's growth from roughly $40 billion worldwide this year to a projected $75 billion to $80 billion market in 2011.
Microsoft contends it offered Yahoo a better alternative even after losing interest in buying the entire company.
When the latest talks broke off June 8, Microsoft was prepared to buy Yahoo's search operations for $1 billion and pay $35 per share to accumulate $8 billion worth of Yahoo's stock, according to an internal note sent Friday by Kevin Johnson, who oversees Microsoft's online operations.
Microsoft also would have offered guarantees that could have boosted Yahoo's operating cash flow by an estimated $1 billion annually, Johnson wrote.
Yahoo estimates the Google partnership will increase its operating cash flow by $250 million to $450 million annually.
"Regardless of Yahoo's decision, we will continue to move forward on our strategy in online services and advertising," Johnson assured Microsoft employees.
Microsoft left the door open to renewing talks about buying Yahoo's search operations. Yahoo also gave itself some wiggle room by including a clause in the Google partnership that would end the alliance for a termination fee of up to $250 million.
Some analysts and investors still think Microsoft eventually might try to buy Yahoo in its entirety, although at a price well below $47.5 billion.
"Yahoo seems to have backed itself into a corner pretty effectively here so it would appear Microsoft has a lot of leverage," said Dan Davidowitz, a portfolio manager for Polen Capital Management, which owns about 750,000 shares of Microsoft and 37,000 shares of Google.
Davidowitz said he isn't interested in owning Yahoo's stock. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
weepingwillow
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Apr 04, 2008
Posts: 635
Location: U.S.A., Tennessee
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 4:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
I didn'tknow where to put this, so it looked good here. We almost lost Yahoo. That may not be anything to a lot of people, but I don't use google, but I do use MSN on occasion.
I couldn't use Yahoo becauseo of their refusal to put any information during the Princess Diana Inquiry, but now I search all of the search engines until I get results that I need. I still don't get a lot. I used to get more.
I can see a lot of the internet going the way of Cable. They took the best chanels like discovery, music chanels, and others to pay extra only to view, so I stopped watching. The cable we have doesn't do that, so we're lucky. I just don't know how they are going to seperate the interent? They are limiting the people as usual.
I am going to take up ham operating and morse code. That is free and international. 
Of course I'm way out of date! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
IAM1
B.V. Info-a-holic
Joined: Sep 01, 2006
Posts: 5474
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| weepingwillow wrote: |
I didn'tknow where to put this, so it looked good here. We almost lost Yahoo. That may not be anything to a lot of people, but I don't use google, but I do use MSN on occasion.
I couldn't use Yahoo becauseo of their refusal to put any information during the Princess Diana Inquiry, but now I search all of the search engines until I get results that I need. I still don't get a lot. I used to get more.
I can see a lot of the internet going the way of Cable. They took the best chanels like discovery, music chanels, and others to pay extra only to view, so I stopped watching. The cable we have doesn't do that, so we're lucky. I just don't know how they are going to seperate the interent? They are limiting the people as usual.
I am going to take up ham operating and morse code. That is free and international.
Of course I'm way out of date! |
Hi weepingwillow! Well, the big corporations are planning on taking over the internet and charging people to use it  . The internet as we all know it will be dramatically changed, heavily regulated and monitored by government agencies, etc. It won't be "Free" any longer. This disaster is supposed to occur in/by 2012! And 2012 isn't that far away, it's just around the corner.... This information would fit well on my "POLICE STATE" thread, but I thought it was interesting and significant enough to make its own thread on. I think a lot of people feel helpless to do anything about it but I've posted those two videos in that article to help people know who to contact to stop this internet regulation and fee from occurring. I only hope people will use the information in those videos to stop corporations from taking control over and profiting from their corporate profiteering takeover. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
IAM1
B.V. Info-a-holic
Joined: Sep 01, 2006
Posts: 5474
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| |
And thanks weepingwillow for the article and your comments/input!   |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
MIB
B.V. VIP - Contributor
Joined: Oct 02, 2001
Posts: 42279
Location: Innsmouth
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| Yahoo can go down the toilet for all I care, google will always be my first choice. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
IAM1
B.V. Info-a-holic
Joined: Sep 01, 2006
Posts: 5474
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 4:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| MIB wrote: |
| Yahoo can go down the toilet for all I care, google will always be my first choice. |
Hi MIB! I have to agree with you on that. I don't like yahoo whatsoever. Google is very good and so is the BV search engine IMO. Star is also good IMO but I don't use it that much because google and BV usually work well to provide the information I'm searching for. But its nice to have other search engines when you might need them just in case. Some people do like Yahoo though and they get what they require from it. Competition in business is a good thing , so even though I don't like Yahoo its good to know it competes with Google. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
MIB
B.V. VIP - Contributor
Joined: Oct 02, 2001
Posts: 42279
Location: Innsmouth
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 5:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
I only use 2 parts of Google, that's the web search and the image search. Don't really care for all that other crap. Google does it's job, fast and it's the one site you can load no matter what freakin connection you have. Even those evil 56k-modem devils can use it.
Of course the way should be open to other search engines like Ask.com, Yahoo, etc. Competition is needed but only when it remains healthy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Personanongrata
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Posts: 2469
Location: NAU
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 7:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
Media,Big Business,and Government work hand-in-hand to advance Fascist agendas.
The internet, in its current incarnation, is a threat to power shareholders.
Information must be restricted and "handled" in order to protect the corrupt.
"If the Party could thrust its hand into the past and say this or that even, it never happened—that, surely, was more terrifying than mere torture and death."
"And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed—if all records told the same tale—then the lie passed into history and became truth. 'Who controls the past' ran the Party slogan, 'controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.'"
"Day by day and almost minute by minute the past was brought up to date. In this way every prediction made by the Party could be shown by documentary evidence to have been correct; nor was any item of news, or any expression of opinion, which conflicted with the needs of the moment, ever allowed to remain on record. All history was a palimpsest, scraped clean and reinscribed exactly as often as was necessary." |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
IAM1
B.V. Info-a-holic
Joined: Sep 01, 2006
Posts: 5474
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| MIB wrote: |
I only use 2 parts of Google, that's the web search and the image search. Don't really care for all that other crap. Google does it's job, fast and it's the one site you can load no matter what freakin connection you have. Even those evil 56k-modem devils can use it.
Of course the way should be open to other search engines like Ask.com, Yahoo, etc. Competition is needed but only when it remains healthy. |
Hi MIB! Yes, I agree again! Thanks for your input/comments, they're always appreciated! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
IAM1
B.V. Info-a-holic
Joined: Sep 01, 2006
Posts: 5474
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| Personanongrata wrote: |
Media,Big Business,and Government work hand-in-hand to advance Fascist agendas.
The internet, in its current incarnation, is a threat to power shareholders.
Information must be restricted and "handled" in order to protect the corrupt.
"If the Party could thrust its hand into the past and say this or that even, it never happened—that, surely, was more terrifying than mere torture and death."
"And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed—if all records told the same tale—then the lie passed into history and became truth. 'Who controls the past' ran the Party slogan, 'controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.'"
"Day by day and almost minute by minute the past was brought up to date. In this way every prediction made by the Party could be shown by documentary evidence to have been correct; nor was any item of news, or any expression of opinion, which conflicted with the needs of the moment, ever allowed to remain on record. All history was a palimpsest, scraped clean and reinscribed exactly as often as was necessary." |
Hi Personanongrata! So true what you've said about media, big business and government! I like the quotes too! Thanks for your input/comments, they are also appreciated! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
MIB
B.V. VIP - Contributor
Joined: Oct 02, 2001
Posts: 42279
Location: Innsmouth
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| IAM1 wrote: |
| MIB wrote: |
I only use 2 parts of Google, that's the web search and the image search. Don't really care for all that other crap. Google does it's job, fast and it's the one site you can load no matter what freakin connection you have. Even those evil 56k-modem devils can use it.
Of course the way should be open to other search engines like Ask.com, Yahoo, etc. Competition is needed but only when it remains healthy. |
Hi MIB! Yes, I agree again! Thanks for your input/comments, they're always appreciated! |
I know, I just don't give it that often  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Personanongrata
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Posts: 2469
Location: NAU
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| |
I could add Organized Crime to that Unholy Trinity, but it's really redundant when you think about it. They're all criminals, anyway.
It's just that some criminals wear expensive suits.  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
IAM1
B.V. Info-a-holic
Joined: Sep 01, 2006
Posts: 5474
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 5:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
| Personanongrata wrote: |
I could add Organized Crime to that Unholy Trinity, but it's really redundant when you think about it. They're all criminals, anyway.
It's just that some criminals wear expensive suits. |
That's the truth! They are monsters dressed up and masquerading as saints! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Author |
Message |
weepingwillow
B.V. Info Seeker
Joined: Apr 04, 2008
Posts: 635
Location: U.S.A., Tennessee
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Goto page 1, 2 Next |
| Page 1 of 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |  |
