517. The California fire is an organized crime (10/28/07)
Quote, "With no new evidence, Fox continues to ask: Did al Qaeda burn California?
David Edwards and Nick Juliano
Published: Thursday October 25, 2007
For the second straight day, Fox News stood virtually alone in advancing thinly supported speculation to raise fears that the wildfires ravaging California are not the result of a confluence of arid heat and high winds but were set deliberately by al Qaeda terrorists bent on destroying America.
Fox & Friends, the conservative cable channel, was panned Wednesday for breathlessly reporting a sketchy, four-year-old FBI memo as if it offered new information linking America's enemies in the "Global War on Terror" with a plot to burn down southern California.
One point I agree with Fox news is that the California fire was caused by arson. But I think the mastermind behind arsonist is Feds not Al Qaida.
1. Al Qaida is always used as scapegoat for every big case in recent years. 911 attack was done in the name of Al Qaida. (a lot of people now realize it was done by insiders to justify Mid-east war) The conflict in Iraq between Sunni and Shiite was provoked by Al Qaida. (killing innocent civilians by "suicide bombers" and bombing shrine mosques) A soured nuclear attack on US on 8/30 was also warned previously by HSD chief Chertoff and FBI director Mueller that Al Qaida would nuke US cities. So was this time.
2. Media is a manipulate tool of Feds. The base of this news came from FBI.
3. Though they could blame it for Al Qaida, one thing Al Qaida unable to do is to create a wild fire situation like this. The fire in Southern California is caused by arid heat and high winds. The technique to control climate needs a long time experiment and huge fund support. So far I haven't see any other country has the ability to do it except US. I have alleged in my case Feds used their climate weapon to create high wind, hurricane and heat. See heat: 424. An unprecedented heat wave (7/30/06), see wind : 345. hurricane, a tool to distract (9/27/05).
4. This was an organized arson case. From TV, several days ago, I caught a brief news that police had shoot dead an arsonist. It also said police were tracking 5 suspects in separate arson case. It used to be individual even if a wild fire was caused by arson. Five separate arson in a wild fire certainly is an organized crime. (consider there were more undiscovered arson in the case) Who has the power to do it?
5. Media censorship. The arson obviously played an important role in this California fire. I caught it from a brief news from TV. Later I tried to find this report from newspaper for detail. I couldn't find any, not a little bit. Obviously it was censored by media. Someone doesn't want people connect the fire to arson despite the fact it was a big one. (Police even killed one suspect.)
6. Motive. I think it is the continuation of the elimination plot. The attempt to finish the plot was so eager that the plan goes one after another.
* 8/31-9/3. Bay Bridge shut down. (marked with 8/30 B-52 nuclear missiles accident)
* 9/14. Air operation stand down. (an attempt of dirty bomb attack)
*10/15 - 10/19. A biggest ever terror drill for three Fictional "Dirty Bombs" To Go Off In Portland, Phoenix And Guam.
* 10/21 Sunday. Alleged dirty bomb attack in Great Mall, Milpitas. My sister and my parents came to my house. My sister asked me if there was a McDonald nearby. They intended to have a lunch there. The nearest McDonald is in Great Mall. I didn't go. Just 10 months ago, there was an alleged bombing attempt plot in that Mall for me. see # 459. December bombing plot in Great Mall (1/5/07)
* On same day, 10/21, California fire started. If I went to McDonald that day, I believe a bombing would have happened and there would be more arson to make the fire a much bigger disaster.
7. California fire not only planned to distract but also carried up a mission to eliminate my daughter. One week before 8/31, local newspapers, both Chinese and English, had big articles about May Zhou's death. The point was that Santa Rosa police concluded May Zhou's death was suicide while May's father referred to an independent pathologist who spoke in other way. The similar articles, must have been shown in San Diego media too, because May's family lives there. Eight months ago, I wrote "467. Attempt to murder my daughter (2/15/07)", alleged May Zhou's death was created to justify would be my daughter's death. Feds revived the issue in August plot again. Obviously determined to make it a big elimination.
To continue the plot, that big fire targeted at San Diego though it also burns in other places. San Diego University evacuated the students. My daughter wondered in Los Angles in a car with her classmates next day. She went home on 10/23 till today.
That is the event for a girl who doesn't live with us in Bay area. Feds prepared different way of elimination.
518. Earthquake after wildfire (11/3/07)
On 10/28, I wrote #517 alleged California fire was an organized crime.
On 10/31, there was a news in World Journal (Chinese) said a teenage admitted he caused a fire when he played with match on 10/21. That until 10/30, 18 fields out of 23 wild fires has been 100% controlled.
On 11/2, there was a brief news in Mercury News.
.....Corner had raced up a hill toward the source of the flames. At the top, she saw a stunned-looking 10-year-old boy and his parents frantically trying to beat the flames down with towels.
The 10-year-old boy quickly admitted he had been playing with matches.
....The fire he admitted starting was one of more than 15 roared Southern California. ...Causes have ranged from arson to downed power lines to sparks set off by construction work."
So 23 different cases caused this wild fire coincidentally. Among them, how many caused by downed power lines? How many caused by construction work? And how many, caused by arsons?
While I try to track the brief news from TV that police are tracking 5 suspects in separate arson and one suspect being shoot dead story, the two news were the only report I could find. Obviously it's a cover up of the arson. Since there were too many to cover up, Fox News even developed a fallacy that Al Qaida did it. But as I said, Al Qaida has no such ability to create an arid heat and high winds which requires huge resources. Feds has.
The California fire was under control in the end of October. Then it came an earthquake.
At 8 p.m. Oct.30, a 5.6 temblor rattles Silicon Valley. It was the first time I encountered with such big a quake. The house shook for 30 seconds. My wife and I rushed out of the house. It was quiet outside. I was surprised to find my wife and I were the only two in the lane. No other people was at sight. I could only think my street neighbors were agents and informants who knew what kind of the quake it would be in advance so they behaved different from ordinary people. Or the surveillance team members didn't want to show their face off. The picture of newspaper next day showed crowd of people outside their house, description: "Frightened San Jose residents wait for firefighters to give the all-clear sign after inspecting the Apartment."
I think the quake was created by Feds. Recently, the framed plot came one after another. In timing, it follows closely to the Southern California fire.
By location, the epicenter is the closest to my house. Scientists used to warn the danger of a big quake at Hayward fault. Hayward fault runs parallel to San Francisco and Oakland, stops at Fremont. The nearest fault to my house is another one: Calaveras fault. The 10/30 quake took place there.
So the temblor is out of scientists' expect. Topic," Energy sent south, away from danger"
"The rupture on the Calveras Fault, just seven miles east of Milpitas, directed its energy to the south, away from the Bay Area's most heavily populated urban centers and the dangerous of Hayward Fault." (Mercury News, 11/1/07)
It was not the energy went south. It was the local energy released artificially.
I looked at the map of the newspaper. The shortest distance from my house to Calaveras Fault is just the distance the epicenter to my house. So my house would be affected by the temblor to its utmost. The technique of artificial earthquake is to apply EM waves on fault to touch off a temblor. Feds picked up a point on fault that is the nearest to my house. Or will someone say it's another coincidence? ( In last message, I just said the nearest McDonald to my house is at Great Mall, Milpitas. Measure with radius, the distance from my house to epicenter may be shorter than Milpitas to it.)
The quake, maybe an intimidation, or a practice, or a pre-drill for a bigger one. It may prove my allegation last year was true. see "396. Rain to create a liquefaction quake (4/5/06)"
From August to now, Feds practised climate weapon many times. There was a Peru earthquake (8/15) to justify an attempt murder disguised as accident on my family members. (their Peru travel 8/16 to 8/22). There was a Minneapolis Bridge collapse (8/1) to justify the close of Bay Bridge. Both showed in media in big articles on 8/2. There were huge winds and hot weather to help California fire a historical big one. (10/21 to 10/2 And on 10/30, there is a quake the epicenter just 7 miles from my house.
On 11/2, I saw a letter in my front yard. It was from Senator Dianne Feinstan's office. I had a petition to her in early August urging her to reconsider the warrantless surveillance law. (see #501) She said she supports it after she had conversation with Mike McConnell, the Director of National Intelligence. The letter dated on 10/17. Why it took two weeks to arrive at my front yard? I puzzled.
Next day, I knew why. The News said Feinstein and Schumer to vote for Mukasey on 11/2. Obviously, Feinstein's letter was dropped there by an agent to show off how they could manipulate the law makers and had their favorite get nominated.
The confirmation of Attorney General nominee Michael Mukasey seemed being in trouble until last Friday. He likely would have failed his hearing in Senate because Mukasey refused to clarify his stand on water boarding torture. Now all of a sudden, his master came to help. DOJ will have an obedient puppet to work for them.
The letter in front yard may mean more. What is it? Two days later, news reported that on 11/4, US Defense secretary Robert Gates arrived in China to question the top officials there about the purpose of their military buildup and to pressure them to stop providing arms to Iran. I am familiar with that kind of cover up. It is another confirmation of a secret deal.
The sudden pass of G.A.'s nomination and the sudden China visit of Gates means a new plot is planned. Feds will have a yes man to cover up their illegal activity. The plot is an old one: a drug case. China will frame the case and offer witness for it. The plot have repeated many times since April 2001.
To confirm my speculation, yesterday's weather forecast show it will rain on Saturday. It is old tactic too. (see #500. IRS raid (8/3/07))
It means the action day will be on this week end.
How will Feds apply the case on me? The only speculation I can have is the garbage bin. Four weeks ago, it was stolen. (see #514. More for October plot 2007 (10/13/07) One week later, my wife said she found it was used by a neighbor cross the street and got it back. She had suggested me to call the garbage company for a new one. I didn't do it. So they returned it a week later. Will Feds make an arrest by claiming they found drug trace in it? I don't know. May be Mukasey will approve it. But if Feds arrest people not for what they doing but by discovering something in their garbage bin, then is it too convenient for them to wrong anyone they dislike by just planting?
520. A brilliant proof for secret deal allegation (11/13/07)
Quote, "The uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise, leaving military chiefs red-faced
By MATTHEW HICKLEY - 10th November 2007
American military chiefs have been left dumbstruck by an undetected Chinese submarine popping up at the heart of a recent Pacific exercise and close to the vast U.S.S. Kitty Hawk - a 1,000ft supercarrier with 4,500 personnel on board."
Does Chinese submarine so advanced that US Navy couldn't detect it even it was at the heart of a Navy exercise? I don't think so. One important principle for military is to hide its ability so its rival can't find a proper tactic to deal with it. How could Chinese Navy broke that principle? Even Chinese sub has that ability to avoid being detected by US Navy, it was unnecessary to pop up to reveal its ability. Was China stupid enough to make such a show off? No, it's not. Then what is it?
It was another soap opera directed by DOJ and DOD. Chinese Navy and US Navy acted it to deceive the public. I view it as a brilliant proof of the allegation of my last message "519. 11/10/07 plot (11/8/07)". It is the result of a secret deal between US and China marked with Gate's Nov.4 visit.
The submarine's pop up event plays the same role of Russian's long range bomber which patrolled to Guam and approached Britain in July - September plot. To show a hostility existed between two countries to cover up an actual collaboration between them.
It may also help DOD to ask for more money from the House. In this May, DOD got 46 billion extra money for surge. I alleged it was for Iran war. The war on Iran failed to be carried out. It doesn't cost that much for surge. Where did the money go? I think they used it in climate war.
For the last big plot, (or also you can say when they got the extra money for surge) there were a big earthquake in Peru, an earthquake in San Jose, a bridge collapse in Minneapolis, and a huge wind and hot weather in southern California. All these were large operation took a lot of money. Intelligence had no such budget, DOD had.
For the coming plot, more climate manipulation will involve. Bush has request another extra 46 billion for it. The submarine event will help his proposal.
Quote, "Bush announces plan to ease airport delays
(New York - WABC, Nov. 15, 2007) - Ahead of the holiday travel crunch, President Bush ordered steps Thursday to reduce air traffic congestion and long delays that have left passengers stranded.
The most significant change is that the Pentagon will open unused military airspace from Florida to Maine to create "a Thanksgiving express lane" for commercial airliners. It will be open next week for five days - Wednesday through Sunday - for the busiest days of Thanksgiving travel"
We know the air traffic delay mainly caused by inefficiency of the airline company and airport, not by the lacking of airspace. If you cross the continent by a car, the traffic jam likely to happen in the city where you start the travel or in the destination city (for air travel it's airport). Seldom you have trouble once you are on freeway. (airspace) It is a joke if Bush says he solves the city traffic problem by adding more cross country freeway. Then why did he make such a ridiculous solution?
In 911 attack, one plane targeted Washington D.C. crashed in midway. Another plane targeted Pentagon likely was hijacked to somewhere else where all people on board were terminated. Circumstance evidence showed that what hit Pentagon was a military drone or a missile not a commercial plane. All four planes left their original airway. Now if there is another 911 alike hijack, what will the crew of the planes do? They will do whatever they can do because they know otherwise it will be death. That may change the result of the original plot planned by the perpetrator. How to comfort the crew member when the plane is led to a different route? The best way is to convince them they are directed to a "Thanksgiving (or Christmas) express way." So there will be little time for crew member to re-act when the last moment comes. (At that time the plane is taken over by the auto-pilot system.) It is a pre-concept psychological operation.
Though it is a speculation, I believe so. Consider Bush and Pentagon never cares human's lives. (The negligence of hurricane Katrina and New Orleans people and the soldiers' lives who died in mid-east war.) Consider Bush only cares for looting people's civil rights (Patriot Act, warrantless surveillance) and money (keep on asking for big war funding), how can Bush suddenly care for your trip delay? Consider Bush is eager to start war on Iran; Consider recent soured plots to justify Iran war (August 30 B-52 mis-loading nuclear missiles, 9/14 air force stand down, 10/15 dirty bomb drill), I allege the likely target of "terror attack" will be some military nuclear facilities or nuclear power plants which located in deserted area under the protect of "military airspace" for security reason. Nobody can sight them even from air before. Now for the necessity of Iran war, they open that forbidden airspace for commercial planes. (or a designated human plane bomb)
The Thanksgiving express lane is an express lane to Iran war. I allege.
522. Bombing shopping center (11/23/07)
On 11/9, newspaper said FBI has issued a warning that Al Qaida has clearly stated "they intend to attack the U.S. or its interests". ABC news reported that Al Qaida was preparing to attack shopping malls in Chicago and Los Angles this holiday seasons.
So far, almost all "terror attack" activated by so said "Al Qaida" were for the interest of the Inside Group. 911 attack targeted at civilians so Americans would support Bush to start the Mid-east war. Bali bombing targeted at Australian tourists so Australians would support their government to join the Iraq war. Al Qaida in Iraq targeted at Iraqi civilians by bombing the market and Shiite shrines to provoke a conflict between Sunni and Shiite. I allege this is a tactic of Pentagon and CIA to wipe out the resistance of Iraqis. Under the cover up of Sunni and Shiite conflict they assassinate Iraqi elite and anti-American force by the death squads. Bin Laden and his vice used to issue a video tape when Bush administration need help either in election, to intimidate people for more power and money, or frame a terror case.
So Al Qaida is only a tool of the Inside Group. We can see how Al Qaida helped Bush administration since he took the seat of US president. This time when FBI repeats the Al Qaida threat, that's old wine in new bottle - to justify a bombing in the name of terrorist. The likely spot will be shopping center near my residence. Especially the big mall - The Great Mall in Milpitas.
There was such attempt in last December when they offered a free ticket for a new Chinese movie. (see "459. December bombing plot in Great Mall (1/5/07)") Last month on 10/21, the day when Southern California fire started and other my family members on a bargain cruise trip, my youngest sister and my parents came, asked for instruction to the nearest McDonald. It was obviously a trick to lure me to the Great Mall where the nearest McDonald was. I think my youngest sister was under the order of Feds. She didn't know it was a death trip. The event remind me of 7/7/05 London bombing. The four "suicide bombers" were in same situation. They were instructed to there but never knew it was a death mission.
One month later, on 11/21, there was a burning smell in sitting room. There was a short circuit in switch box. The electrical power to kitchen and sitting room was cut. The wire in switch box was burned so severe that I have to restore power by setting up a new electrical wire. I have no material. My wife wouldn't do the shopping. She said, "I am afraid the Home Depot is closed on holiday." Today will be the third day kitchen remain in dark. Of course I won't go Home Depot. It is in Great Mall. I'm afraid a bombing there.
Not only I won't go Great Mall, also I don't go nearby shopping centers for more than half a year for same reason. I'll talk about it later.
523. Cyberspace harassment and power abusing (11/28/07)
From 11/11 to 11/13, for consecutive three days, Mercury News put an investigation series of "Cybercrime" on its first page. It is a big article with big title. I then knew FBI would expand their power abusing in internet area. That article was used to request for more power and budget.
The article said that Cyberspace force is the third biggest force in FBI. They are:
1. The biggest one: counter terrorism, (5,987 employees)
2. Next big: Counterintelligence. (4,479 employees)
3. Third big: Cyber Division. (1,151 employees)
What does that third big division do? Cyberspace law enforcement which deal with internet attack, compact-disc privacy and online child pornography.
What about communication of terrorists? It should belong to counter terrorism. Communication of spy? It should belong to counterintelligence. Other agencies also take big role in cyberspace area. The Secret Service, practiced in combating counterfeiting, handles computer-driven financial crimes. Homeland Security Department, the Federal Trade Commission, U.S.Postal Service and Immigration and Customs also have roles. So is that third big division too small as FBI said? I think it is too big that caused internet harassment.
Since I started to post in internet forum, I suffered endless harassment. I allege Feds have organized harassing team in internet which used to spread disinformation and attack dissenters. For my personal experience, I allege:
1. Feds organized team to attack me personally with words such like "insane, tin-foiled man, schizophrenia...."
2. Feds intimidate readers of my article. I reveal plot of Feds and having analysis on how they did it. My article used to attract more and more readers. It may appeal readers by hundreds each time I posting a new one. Then all of a sudden, the readers disappeared. The number dropped to less then a dozen.(I keep a record each time I post) It may caused by (1) Feds called reader of my article, tarnished me as a bad guy they were tracking. (2) blocking my article to readers by cyberspace technique. (such like technique of "ignorance")
3. Feds intimidate web-site host. Some administrator obeyed under the pressure to ban me though I didn't do anything against the rule. Some boards run by media would rather finish the service of discussion board. I think media still put "free speech" as their first principle and wouldn't to ban without appropriate reason. They include "New York Times", "www.alternet.org, www.npr.org, smirkingchimp.com.
4. Harass by misplacing paragraphs of the article, made my post hard to read. It happened in care2.com, Islam, U.S. Constitution and Politics Discussion Forum.
5. Recently I was blocked to post in some web-sites or even being blocked to enter the site. Such like "myspace"; OC on line, perspectives.com; truthaction.org; asiansinc.com. I think it was done by the surveillance server of the Feds.
The ghosts in the browser is no other but Feds. They commit the crime of violation of the Constitution. Yet they can go on with the power abusing because they are part of the DOJ. When they demand more resource to expand their power, a darker age of cyberspace is coming.
524. Bin Laden's tape and dirty bomb attack on Europe (12/3/07)
Bin Laden used to issue a tape when Bush administration needs help. Or you can view it is the work of misinformation of US intelligence. 11/29/07, Osama let out another one.
The only "achievement" Bush can boast, (or he thinks he can boast for himself) is the "war on terror". Al Qaida is a tool created by US Inside Group to squeeze money and power from people. When they need a war, or pass a "Patriot Act", or for an election, Bin Laden's Al Qaida always came out to help, either by a bombing or by a tape. So was this time.
Bush's population is so low, how can his war party - GOP to win the next election? There is another war plan still needs to be fulfilled. That is war on Iran. Bin Laden must work to support Bush.
1. Bush's Iraq war was supported by Tony Blair. To show he is not alone on his war policy. For the next war, (Iran war) Bush still needs a support from Europe. It is likely he developed some supporters such like France and German. But how can they make people support their new war? Old tactic - terror bombing. That's why Bin Laden's new tape turns on to Europe. The title of news is: "Osama Urges Europe to Stop Helping U.S.". The real meaning of this tape is: "Al Qaida will have a terror attack on you to push you support US".
2. It's strange to see that in this tape Bin Laden said he was the "only one responsible" for the Sept. 11 attacks on New York and Washington - six years after 911 attack.
The background of his confession is that after six years, one third of Americans realize 911 attack was an inside job. And majority of Americans think Government knew 911 attack in advance but let it happen. So government needs a strong defense lawyer. No one can be strong enough than Bin Laden. The Inside Group had push out a "defense witness" - Moussaoui. He cried loudly in court "I am Al Qaida." and admitted he was plotted to attack on 911. Bin Laden is just another Moussaoui. Their purpose are so clear and direct: " Don't doubt on Bush and his administration. I did the terror attack." Isn't that easy and convenient to suppress the suspicion on Inside Group?
Rudy Giuliani is a leading runner of president candidate. He is trumpeted by media as a 911 hero. As a matter of fact, he is a leading role to cover up the truth of 911 attack. The Inside Group needs him to go on the cover up job on a false flag attack. So they need someone to justify that 911 was a real terror attack not an inside work. Bin Laden does it in his new tape.
I wrote "Bin Laden's new tape" on 11/29 when I learned the news.(see above) One day later, another news proved my allegation.
Re: "Britain faces threat of dirty bomb attack at Christmas, Home Secretary warns
30th November 2007
Britain faces an increased threat of a "dirty bomb" attack over the Christmas period, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith warned today.
On 12/3, media reported that US National Intelligence Estimate said Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003. The revelation caused a debate on Bush's Iran policy. The point missing in this debate is how could such an important information be learned by government and public so late - it took more than four years. (2003 - Dec. 2007) It took three years and eight months for US to get in World War II. ( Dec. 1941 - Japan surrender Aug. 1945) If US intelligence is so incompetent, that it took four years to reach an important conclusion, then by the time when they got a NIE of "Japan will attack Pearl Harbor", the war had finished already. This NIE of Iran is absurd. It's not intelligence but National History estimate.
This new NIE on Iran (2007) is a contradict to another one (2005) which asserted that Iran was "determined to develop nuclear weapon". If 2007 NIE took four years to conclude event of 2003, apply same efficiency on 2005 Assessment, does that mean "Iran seeking nuclear weapon" was something on 2001? Or more likely, this government just select information that fits its demand?
Review recent situation, Bush administration and media used to demonize Iran as a nuclear threat to the world. US had its Navy battle squadron gathered at Persian Gulf to show its force. Iran war for several times were just inches away from breaking off .
Bush administration also took a blind eye on that new assessment (Iran halted nuclear weapon programme). Bush knew that estimate in August.
Re: "Bush told Iran may have halted atom work
Thu Dec 6, 2007 7:03am GMT
By Tabassum Zakaria
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush was told in August that Iran may have suspended its nuclear weapons programme, http://uk.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUKN0565348320071206
Yet, two months later in October, he warns World War III if Iran goes nuclear. This proves he treated the NIE as a junk piece.
Then why the intelligence let out such a "junk" information (possibly a truth but not favored by Bush administration) at this time?
I think it is a part of Iran war tactic.
1, Iran will be directed to a nuclear weapon "trap". The war will be done in Bush's remnant term. Bush has a swift re-action to that new NIE. He insists Iran a threat despite new report. When Iran war breaks off, Bush will be painted as a hero.
2. A psychological operation to push Iran to a nuclear weapon trap. Iran may feel safe that Bush is under criticism for his aggressive Iran policy and accept a "special offer" from Russia's Putin. The special proposal maybe a bait of enriched uranium which can be also used in military weapon. (see #516. Iran war next stage (10/23/07)) It's a tactic to push Iran to accept a Trojan horse. Russia's nuclear deal with Iran is that Trojan horse.
Bush activated Iraq war. Bush tries to plant a Trojan horse in Iran. Bush will start war on Iran once the Trojan horse is planted.
Yesterday I was typing online about Bush and typed his name about 6 or 7 times in a paragraph (just a rough estimate) and I noticed something very strange happened with my surge protector attached to my computer....it started to make a clicking noise, which has never happened since I've had the surge protector, I just thought that was strange.
When I learned the new Bin Laden tape, I wrote "Bin Laden's new tape". (see #524) Then other news surged which combined with Bin Laden's new tape, could justify a dirty bomb attack in Europe. It may prove my opinion is correct: "But how can they make people support their new war? Old tactic - terror bombing. That's why Bin Laden's new tape turns on Europe. The title of news is: "Osama Urges Europe to Stop Helping U.S.". The real meaning of this tape is: "I'll push you to support US" (by terror attack on you)."
The three events (watch the time of the news date) : 1. Bin Laden's new tape. (11/29)
2. Gang selling enriched Uranium. (11/29) 3. British warns dirty bomb attack. (11/30) if you put them together, could make another perfect 911 story. Do you think they came out coincidentally? Who can manipulate these three events and make their debut at same time? (Bin Laden or Western intelligence?)
Re: Gang arrested trying to sell enriched uranium
Times Online
November 29, 2007
A gang arrested by Slovakian police was trafficking uranium so enriched that it could have been used by terrorists in a dirty bomb, it emerged today.
Two Hungarians and a Ukrainian man were arrested as they tried to sell the uranium last night. The consignment had been tracked by police after it came to their attention inside the former Soviet Union.
I always said that Feds frames case with the collaboration of Russia and China. In this Christmas and New Years holiday plot, there is no exception. It's interesting that to cover up the secret deal, they use Hungarians and Ukrainian this time. But the source finally leads to Russia. All roads go to Moscow in the end. (or Beijing)
There is a lot of advantage to plot with Russia and China. 1. Even if others get suspicious and want to track, they will kick at an iron wall. These two countries belong to another camp. Litvinenko's case is a sample. 2. It's deceivable. Public won't doubt when Russia and China involve in the case. It's hard to imagine that government work with former enemies.
As for Al Qaida. It is a tool of the US intelligence. I always say so.
527. S.F. Bay Oil spill and Bay Bridge (12/18/07)
In Fed's framed case, shut down the Bay Bridge always played an important role. I noticed that in 15 months, they managed to close the Bay Bridge four times. see "515. Bay Bridge shutdown and Minneapolis bridge collapsing (10/18/07)".
On 11/7, about 8:30 in the morning, a Chinese commercial ship - the Cosco Busan, rammed a support tower of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, caused an oil spill. The media bang on the 58,000 gallon oil pollution. I didn't relate it to the framed case because though the ship got a big scratch, there was little damage on the Bay Bridge. (or at least media didn't report it) News concentrated on the dead sea birds, ban of fishing, polluted beach and ship and its crews and the pilot. No word about the Bridge. The only question was it was foggy that morning, why the ship still left Oakland port while it could stay until the sight view was clear.
The ship owner is a Chinese company in Hongkong which bought the Cosco Busan last year. (second hand ship) The company said it would take all the cost of oil pollution. The first thought I had was: "What a generous company it is. The cost to clean the oil will be huge."
Early December, an analysis article in Chinese newspaper reminded me this is not an accident. The opinion was from an experienced captain - Jing Gang - a retired captain from Taiwan who had served in Navy for 20 years and also had more than ten years experience as captain of commercial fleet, said the accident shouldn't have happened.
Besides the professional analysis, (omitted here), the captain has some suspicions: 1. The span between the two bridge supporters is 2,000 feet - very broad for a ship to sail through. The error tolerance of the GPS is less than 60 feet. The ship should also have at least two radar. The accident shouldn't have happened. 2. Coast Guard had informed Cosco Busan that it sailed on wrong direction. Why there was no response and correction? And there is no explanation later. 3. Most puzzled thing for him is, the Cosco Busan was sailing parallel along the Bridge. It could only happen when the main engine or helm damaged. 4.Cosco Busan could avoid to hit the bridge support tower unless it was on speed.
If captain could view the incident from another angle, his puzzle can be solved. The "incident" was a deliberation. The purpose was to damage the Bridge supporter to close the Bay Bridge. Then it explains everything. Why did the Cosco Busan sailed parallel to the bridge not vertical to cross it? Because the shape of the foundation of a bridge supporter is in olive shape. Which has more chance to hit an olive - by head on head or to hit it from its side? Other questions such like speed, radar, GPS, no response to the warning from Coast Guard.... all could be answered if it was a deliberate hit.
To close the Bay Bridge by a ship bomb is just a copy of 911 attack while the bomb in 911 case were planes. It was one plan in Feds cabinet. The plan was prepared one year ago when they bought an old ship. (ready to be destroyed in an "accident'). The company is likely a cover up one of the intelligence. When the 8/31/07 plot went soured, (marked with the shut down of Bay Bridge and the B-52 misloading of nuclear missiles) they immediately prepared another one. I called the new one as "holiday season plot". It marked with "Bush's air express lane offer; Bin Laden's new tape; London dirty bomb warning; Chinese sub's popping up; Gate's visit China.... " and also this one: a ship collapsed the Bay Bridge.
It almost succeeds. Only several yards away they could close up the Bay Bridge for a long time. Much longer than the one when they burned down a highway by a fuel tanker. (that highway is a main access to Bay Bridge)
Was that a mission went soured by a hair or a mission soured by its own operatives? Nobody knows. When Mohammed and Malve became scapegoat of DC sniper shooting case, or the Atta and his hijack team became sacrifice of 911 plane bomb, more and more people realize the trick played by intelligence. When four Arabic British became sacrifice of 7/7/05 London tunnel bombing, we saw four suspects of the following bombing (7/21/05) all survived well. The designated bombs didn't explode. All four of them.
So what did the pilot and the crew of the Cosco Busan think the moment when the boat would hit the support tower of the bridge? Were they willingly to become a suicide ship bomb? Suppose they were the operatives of the intelligence. Your bet.
528. Bird Flu in Holiday season plot (12/23/07)
In late 2005 and early 2006, Feds activated a wave of propaganda about bird flu. (or avian flu). I think Feds planned to kill a lot of people in the framed case on me. For nearly six months, media is full of scaring article such like:
Virtual Pandemic: 90 Days to Infect Entire U.S.
By Robert Roy Britt LiveScience Managing Editor, 05 April 2006
A new computer model reveals how a pandemic like the avian flu might spread quickly across the United States and what methods would best thwart the scenario.
I wrote #410. The pandemic and the death of the Director of WHO (6/5/06), alleged Feds plotted a pandemic of bird flu. To cause a world wide panic, they murdered the Director of WHO and let their own candidate to take over the control of WHO. I think my revelation is very correct. Since then, the Frightening Warning disappeared from US mainstream media thoroughly. How can a pandemic which could kill 50% of population and infect entire US in 90 days suddenly lost its importance? Here we get familiar with Feds' pre-conception psychological operation and how mainstream media helps it.
Although US mainstream media rarely talk about bird flu since June 2006, the pandemic still remains as a mean of mass murder. In local Chinese newspaper, it becomes a routine to report the death caused by bird flu in Indonesia and Vietnam.
Here are some briefing news I collected:
12/20/05 Indonesia bird flu. . the man will be the tenth in Indonesia died of Bird Flu.
4/29/06 Another Indonesian lost in bird flu. The man will be the 25th victim of Bird Flu.
10/14/07 Indonesia Bird Flu. A boy died of Bird Flu. The death toll increases to 88.
Each week or so, Indonesia reported a Bird Flu death. I alleged the president of Indonesia works for US intelligence when the Big tsunami happened in 2005. Indonesia becomes a practice field for US bio and climate weapon. They made the bird flu (avian flu) a continuous disease there. Because the framed drug case on me is a continuous one - new plot created immediately after the failure of old one. So when their framed case goes succeeded, they can have a bird flu case right away on hand to justify a pandemic. When people live in panic of death threat, no one will notice the mysterious death in an unreasonable search and arrest case.
When Gates visited China in early November, I knew there was a new case created by the cooperation of US and Chinese intelligence. The ship which hit the Bay Bridge was one step in the plan. There is more.
On 12/8, Chinese newspaper reported: "Man to man. Avian Flu took the lives of Father and son in JiangSu Province"
"Chinese Health Department confirmed the 24 years old man of Nanjing died of infection of Avian flu virus H5N1. His 52 years old father had infected the same virus.... WHO in Geneva said they wouldn't exclude the possibility that son passed the Avian Flu virus to his father. (a man to man case).......
Besides, the neighbor city Shanghai, enters a high alert situation to watch the passengers from Nanjing."
The Holiday season plot is a big one. Not only they will activate terror attack in Europe, they will also create a bio-attack - a bird flu pandemic world wide. There will be mass killing in the plot, both in US and China, especially in Shanghai where I have a lot of relatives. Those people know of my case and had cooperated with authority to monitor me when I went to Shanghai in 94. But Feds won't allow witness of their crime alive even these people work for them. Atta and his hijack team of 911 attack were, "Suicide bombers" of London 7/7/05 bombing were, Cho Seunghui and Emily Hilscher in Virginia Tech shooting case were all sacrifice. They were killed by their master without hesitation.
When I learned the new Bin Laden tape, I wrote "Bin Laden's new tape". (see #524) Then other news surged which combined with Bin Laden's new tape, could justify a dirty bomb attack in Europe. It may prove my opinion is correct: "But how can they make people support their new war? Old tactic - terror bombing. That's why Bin Laden's new tape turns on Europe. The title of news is: "Osama Urges Europe to Stop Helping U.S.". The real meaning of this tape is: "I'll push you to support US" (by terror attack on you)."
The three events (watch the time of the news date) : 1. Bin Laden's new tape. (11/29)
2. Gang selling enriched Uranium. (11/29) 3. British warns dirty bomb attack. (11/30) if you put them together, could make another perfect 911 story. Do you think they came out coincidentally? Who can manipulate these three events and make their debut at same time? (Bin Laden or Western intelligence?)
Re: Gang arrested trying to sell enriched uranium
Times Online
November 29, 2007
A gang arrested by Slovakian police was trafficking uranium so enriched that it could have been used by terrorists in a dirty bomb, it emerged today.
Two Hungarians and a Ukrainian man were arrested as they tried to sell the uranium last night. The consignment had been tracked by police after it came to their attention inside the former Soviet Union.
I always said that Feds frames case with the collaboration of Russia and China. In this Christmas and New Years holiday plot, there is no exception. It's interesting that to cover up the secret deal, they use Hungarians and Ukrainian this time. But the source finally leads to Russia. All roads go to Moscow in the end. (or Beijing)
There is a lot of advantage to plot with Russia and China. 1. Even if others get suspicious and want to track, they will kick at an iron wall. These two countries belong to another camp. Litvinenko's case is a sample. 2. It's deceivable. Public won't doubt when Russia and China involve in the case. It's hard to imagine that government work with former enemies.
As for Al Qaida. It is a tool of the US intelligence. I always say so.
527. S.F. Bay Oil spill and Bay Bridge (12/18/07)
In Fed's framed case, shut down the Bay Bridge always played an important role. I noticed that in 15 months, they managed to close the Bay Bridge four times. see "515. Bay Bridge shutdown and Minneapolis bridge collapsing (10/18/07)".
On 11/7, about 8:30 in the morning, a Chinese commercial ship - the Cosco Busan, rammed a support tower of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, caused an oil spill. The media bang on the 58,000 gallon oil pollution. I didn't relate it to the framed case because though the ship got a big scratch, there was little damage on the Bay Bridge. (or at least media didn't report it) News concentrated on the dead sea birds, ban of fishing, polluted beach and ship and its crews and the pilot. No word about the Bridge. The only question was it was foggy that morning, why the ship still left Oakland port while it could stay until the sight view was clear.
The ship owner is a Chinese company in Hongkong which bought the Cosco Busan last year. (second hand ship) The company said it would take all the cost of oil pollution. The first thought I had was: "What a generous company it is. The cost to clean the oil will be huge."
Early December, an analysis article in Chinese newspaper reminded me this is not an accident. The opinion was from an experienced captain - Jing Gang - a retired captain from Taiwan who had served in Navy for 20 years and also had more than ten years experience as captain of commercial fleet, said the accident shouldn't have happened.
Besides the professional analysis, (omitted here), the captain has some suspicions: 1. The span between the two bridge supporters is 2,000 feet - very broad for a ship to sail through. The error tolerance of the GPS is less than 60 feet. The ship should also have at least two radar. The accident shouldn't have happened. 2. Coast Guard had informed Cosco Busan that it sailed on wrong direction. Why there was no response and correction? And there is no explanation later. 3. Most puzzled thing for him is, the Cosco Busan was sailing parallel along the Bridge. It could only happen when the main engine or helm damaged. 4.Cosco Busan could avoid to hit the bridge support tower unless it was on speed.
If captain could view the incident from another angle, his puzzle can be solved. The "incident" was a deliberation. The purpose was to damage the Bridge supporter to close the Bay Bridge. Then it explains everything. Why did the Cosco Busan sailed parallel to the bridge not vertical to cross it? Because the shape of the foundation of a bridge supporter is in olive shape. Which has more chance to hit an olive - by head on head or to hit it from its side? Other questions such like speed, radar, GPS, no response to the warning from Coast Guard.... all could be answered if it was a deliberate hit.
To close the Bay Bridge by a ship bomb is just a copy of 911 attack while the bomb in 911 case were planes. It was one plan in Feds cabinet. The plan was prepared one year ago when they bought an old ship. (ready to be destroyed in an "accident'). The company is likely a cover up one of the intelligence. When the 8/31/07 plot went soured, (marked with the shut down of Bay Bridge and the B-52 misloading of nuclear missiles) they immediately prepared another one. I called the new one as "holiday season plot". It marked with "Bush's air express lane offer; Bin Laden's new tape; London dirty bomb warning; Chinese sub's popping up; Gate's visit China.... " and also this one: a ship collapsed the Bay Bridge.
It almost succeeds. Only several yards away they could close up the Bay Bridge for a long time. Much longer than the one when they burned down a highway by a fuel tanker. (that highway is a main access to Bay Bridge)
Was that a mission went soured by a hair or a mission soured by its own operatives? Nobody knows. When Mohammed and Malve became scapegoat of DC sniper shooting case, or the Atta and his hijack team became sacrifice of 911 plane bomb, more and more people realize the trick played by intelligence. When four Arabic British became sacrifice of 7/7/05 London tunnel bombing, we saw four suspects of the following bombing (7/21/05) all survived well. The designated bombs didn't explode. All four of them.
So what did the pilot and the crew of the Cosco Busan think the moment when the boat would hit the support tower of the bridge? Were they willingly to become a suicide ship bomb? Suppose they were the operatives of the intelligence. Your bet.
528. Bird Flu in Holiday season plot (12/23/07)
In late 2005 and early 2006, Feds activated a wave of propaganda about bird flu. (or avian flu). I think Feds planned to kill a lot of people in the framed case on me. For nearly six months, media is full of scaring article such like:
Virtual Pandemic: 90 Days to Infect Entire U.S.
By Robert Roy Britt LiveScience Managing Editor, 05 April 2006
A new computer model reveals how a pandemic like the avian flu might spread quickly across the United States and what methods would best thwart the scenario.
I wrote #410. The pandemic and the death of the Director of WHO (6/5/06), alleged Feds plotted a pandemic of bird flu. To cause a world wide panic, they murdered the Director of WHO and let their own candidate to take over the control of WHO. I think my revelation is very correct. Since then, the Frightening Warning disappeared from US mainstream media thoroughly. How can a pandemic which could kill 50% of population and infect entire US in 90 days suddenly lost its importance? Here we get familiar with Feds' pre-conception psychological operation and how mainstream media helps it.
Although US mainstream media rarely talk about bird flu since June 2006, the pandemic still remains as a mean of mass murder. In local Chinese newspaper, it becomes a routine to report the death caused by bird flu in Indonesia and Vietnam.
Here are some briefing news I collected:
12/20/05 Indonesia bird flu. . the man will be the tenth in Indonesia died of Bird Flu.
4/29/06 Another Indonesian lost in bird flu. The man will be the 25th victim of Bird Flu.
10/14/07 Indonesia Bird Flu. A boy died of Bird Flu. The death toll increases to 88.
Each week or so, Indonesia reported a Bird Flu death. I alleged the president of Indonesia works for US intelligence when the Big tsunami happened in 2005. Indonesia becomes a practice field for US bio and climate weapon. They made the bird flu (avian flu) a continuous disease there. Because the framed drug case on me is a continuous one - new plot created immediately after the failure of old one. So when their framed case goes succeeded, they can have a bird flu case right away on hand to justify a pandemic. When people live in panic of death threat, no one will notice the mysterious death in an unreasonable search and arrest case.
When Gates visited China in early November, I knew there was a new case created by the cooperation of US and Chinese intelligence. The ship which hit the Bay Bridge was one step in the plan. There is more.
On 12/8, Chinese newspaper reported: "Man to man. Avian Flu took the lives of Father and son in JiangSu Province"
"Chinese Health Department confirmed the 24 years old man of Nanjing died of infection of Avian flu virus H5N1. His 52 years old father had infected the same virus.... WHO in Geneva said they wouldn't exclude the possibility that son passed the Avian Flu virus to his father. (a man to man case).......
Besides, the neighbor city Shanghai, enters a high alert situation to watch the passengers from Nanjing."
The Holiday season plot is a big one. Not only they will activate terror attack in Europe, they will also create a bio-attack - a bird flu pandemic world wide. There will be mass killing in the plot, both in US and China, especially in Shanghai where I have a lot of relatives. Those people know of my case and had cooperated with authority to monitor me when I went to Shanghai in 94. But Feds won't allow witness of their crime alive even these people work for them. Atta and his hijack team of 911 attack were, "Suicide bombers" of London 7/7/05 bombing were, Cho Seunghui and Emily Hilscher in Virginia Tech shooting case were all sacrifice. They were killed by their master without hesitation.
In recent years, Feds planned a lot of false flag terror attacks, some are real big one such like 8/30/07 nuclear attack on US (A B-52 misloading 6 nuclear missiles) or 07 Holiday season plot (marked with Bush's military airspace offer which may imply the bombing on US nuclear facilities). Within 18 months, for five times Feds has shut down (or try to shut down) the Bay Bridge. All these plots went soured. I think because either I had revealed the coming plot in advance or they failed to eliminate the main target of the plot - that's me.
Though Feds can gain a lot - both money and power - from the terror attack, they would rather postpone the plan when they failed to eliminate me first. Feds won't lose anything if they haven't carry out a terror attack, but it will hurt them if I am alive and go on revealing their crime. The method of elimination are:
1. To make an IRS search to arrest. (I think Feds has planted drugs in my house.) To reach this goal, Feds manipulated my wife to misreported tax-return last year without my consent as well as this year. (because I have unsold merchandise stock in my garage.) To search and arrest in the name of IRS is one tactic Feds used to use.
2. To make a search in the name of natural disaster - earthquake. Early last year they attempted to do so with a Liquefaction quake. (see #397 and #399) In October this year there was a 5.6 quake at my area. I think it was a pre-practice. see "518. Earthquake after wildfire (11/3/07)". Since then, I almost felt daily earth shaking. So mild that media never report it but I could just feel it. I think they are practicing and adjusting the vibration frequency. There will be a big one if Feds has certainty. Honestly, I haven't feel it for days so far. The earthquake team may be on holiday vacation.
3. By applying EM wave on me. (I allege it was a gamma ray)
4. Poison food, especially the water.
5. Shopping center bombing. I used to go different shopping centers. Early this year I stopped to go around to avoid a mall bombing. I think that's the main murder method Feds apply on me now.(see #459, #517)
Some people don't believe there is earthquake technique. Here is the information released ten years ago.
Re:
DoD News Briefing: Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen
April 28, 1997
There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.
When recent media poll dramatically changed the rate of Democrats' candidates - by pulling down Hillary Clinton's and push up John Edwards', I felt that Feds would put their own representative - Edwards - to the throne of President. Generally, unless something big happened, the public's opinion is not so easy to change. A dramatical change of the polling data without convincible reason only reflects intention of Feds. Feds is the one who manipulates the media.
Yesterday, two news touched my mind. They were about weather. It said snowstorm socked Midwest, dumping more than a foot of snow and creating hazardous driving condition there. Since it becomes common that Feds alters a climate condition to help its operation, I think Feds created that storm to help John Edwards in today's Iowa Primary. I wrote "John Edwards".
I used to put that kind of article in political thread. But before I could finish the article in a reply, it disappeared - I lost connection to internet. It happened before when I wrote article Feds disliked. I had to re-write it on WordPad than copy and paste it to avoid the loss of article. Then there were repeated losing connection of internet when I tried to post it on the board. The harassment convince me what I wrote is accurate. Feds is afraid of it. I decide to put it in this thread too. Here is it:
John Edwards (1/2/0
John Edwards works for the Inside Group. He has the characters of a Feds. Feds is a tool of the Inside Group to control this country. They monitor and spy on people. Blackmail and intimidate politicians. Murder and assassinate if necessary. Infiltrate different groups with moles. Manipulate media and rig the election. Feds has no its own opinion. It works to the order from its master. He smiles at the man whom he plans to kill tomorrow.
John Edwards is such kind of man. Media used to post a picture of his smiling face. Is he liberal or conservative? Nobody can tell. Because he has no distinctive opinion. He ducked the debate to avoid express his own opinion. (when he was a Senator) He tried not to offend anyone, either individual or group. Because his work is to monitor others but not to be noticeable. That may be why he resigned from the Senate. (tries not to express his own opinion so no mistake can be exploited by his opponents when he later joins the campaign)
But in crucial moment, they came out to carry out their master's policy. That's how he voted for Patriot Act and Iraq war Authorization bill. He only shows his true face in critical moment.
Now is a crucial point. Bush is so unpopular that to rig a victory for GOP will be too obvious a forgery. The Inside Group needs a representative in Demo. Hillary, though is a follower of the Inside Group, can't compare with Edwards - a representative of Feds' own.
This is how to rig the Iowa Primary. Different from normal election which is easy to rig. ( a rigged election done by the election office controlled by Feds and the result justified by manipulated media poll) Iowa Primary (Demo) depends on the presented individuals. It's hard to rig the count of the presence of people. (just like it's hard to rig the campaign donation money of Ron Paul's) Then how Feds can do to rig the primary? - by altering the weather. They create an extra cold condition for the Iowa.
Edwards will win the Primary because his supporters (A troop of Feds informants who work under discipline) will attend the vote despite how cold the weather is. The supporters of other candidates will be affected by natural humanity softness. Most people will stay at home if it's too cold and dangerous outside. That's how Feds to rig an election with climate change.
The other news that reminds me this is a rigged election (by altering weather)
"Clinton Backers: Californians try to sway voters
By Mary Anne Ostrom
Mercury News, 1/2/08
Cear Rapids, Iowa - Iowans are being warned to stay indoors because of deadly cold temperatures and dangerous roads, but a dozen Silicon Valley campaign foot soldiers are in a race over snow and ice to get them to come out for Hillary Clinton."
An Iowa victory will justify the later rigged election for Edwards. Make the rigging more reasonable. That's why Feds tries its best to make Edwards "win Iowa".
Feds used to react swiftly to my revelation. When I found this, I put the date on my post.
*I posted Judi Bary's story on 3/25/2002.(see #60) Several days later, I was surprised to read the news that her case was going to trial on 4/8/2002. Judi brought the case to the court in 1991. It was delayed again and again. Judi herself couldn't see the trial. She died of breast cancer in 1997 which I alleged a radiation murder. On 6/11/2002, the jury found FBI and Oakland police lied in the case and violated victim's Constitution right of 1st Amendment and 4th Amendment. Judge ruled a 4.4 million compensation. The late justice came after 11 years dragging. I thought it was a swift response to my message. They try to clean up the odds. Anyway, it's a small case for them. (see #96)
*On 12/18, I wrote "527. S.F. Bay Oil spill and Bay Bridge (12/18/07)". Two days later, I surprisedly heard the news that Cosco Busan, the ship that caused oil spill left Bay Area on 12/20.
Just on 12/14, Captain Anya Hunter of Coast Guard said the vessel could not be released before authority finishing the civil and criminal investigation. That day, the ship changed its anchorage to Pier 9 where the fee for berth was cheaper. Obviously it would stay there for some time.
But one day after I revealed it was a criminal case, they let go an evidence despite the investigation far from finishing.
*On 12/28, I wrote "Negative campaign fund planting (12/28/07)" in which I alleged Norman Hsu worked for Feds in order to manipulating politicians. Five days later (1/3) he was put on a trial and sentenced 3 years prison on same day.
Norman Hsu is a fugitive of a fraud case 15 years ago. (1992) A fugitive should live in covert, try not to be noticeable. But Hsu went on with his forgery. He even became a fundraiser of Democratic Party. He appears in high profile event with Hillary. There was no trouble for him. It means he has background. He can go on with his crime until when Feds needs a case to tarnish Hillary Clinton.
Here is the original article. Notice the sentence which touched off a swift one day trial on Norman Hsu.
Re: Negative campaign fund planting (12/28/07)
"Ron Paul To Keep White Supremacist Donation". A recent popular article about Ron Paul's campaign fund.
People are too innocent not to recognize it's another dirty trick of election. Feds used to plant negative contribution to candidate so they have an issue to attack these candidates.
The similar way they do to Clinton by Norman Hsu's contribution.
GOP is skilled in those dirty tricks. You also saw Swift Boat Team attack on Kerry in 2004's election.
Ron Paul is a disfavor of ruling class. So once again, FBI plays trick to tarnish the most hopeful candidate. The two most fearsome rival for GOP are: Ron Paul (Republican) and Hillary (Demo). So the attack concentrate on them.
Who control those organization: Communist Party; supremacist; peace movement; even ACLU and other groups? FBI.
Quote, "FBI Ran Aryan Nations After Butler's Death
Federal Informant Rick Spring, Close Associate Of NSM / Schoep, Admits He Was On Federal Payroll
9/19/2007 4:09:21 PM
Discuss this story in the forum <http>
Overthrow Staff
-- In a confessional emailed out to white nationalist leaders, federal informant and convicted bank robber Rick Spring admitted today that he operated the Aryan Nations as a false flag front group for the FBI after the death of Richard Butler.
"I have to bare my heart and soul to the good folks of the movement, although this is hard for me to say, I must tell the truth. I Rick Spring have been working for the FED's for some time now and I am sorry," Spring wrote in an email today.
Now you know why supremacist donate to Ron Paul's campaign? And why some one cooks this issue hot? It may all be done by the same hand.
532. We need an honest, transparent election (Iowa Primary lesson 1) (1/13/07)
Obama wins Iowa - a state with 92% white population. Why a white state which generally considered conservative has elected a black candidate? It means American people are too resentful to the policy of current government. They hate Iraq war and the loss of civil right.
How can we have this result? Because Iowa Democratic Primary Caucus is an honest, transparent one. Residents gathered at the site on time to discuss their choices then raise their hands. The counting is present, direct and clear. Voters know the result right away. It makes an election hard to be rigged.
As we have seen the mainstream of public opinion is to change the status quo, then Ron Paul should have won the Iowa Republican Caucus too. He has more distinctive flag than Obama has. But he only got 10%. Why? He obviously lost to a corruptive vote system in Iowa Republican Primary - ballot counting.
The ballot was counted by election office. Then an officer would tell you the result. A number can be faked or altered easily. Voters can hardly verify it individually.
This is proved in New Hampshire Primary:
Quote, "Voter Fraud Against Paul Confirmed in Sutton, N.H
By admin | January 8, 2008
Sutton with 100% reporting reported 0 votes for paul but poster in Sutton posted:
My mom, aunt, and dad all voted for RP today in my hometown, My mom and aunt both work passing out ballots, and checking them off. I just looked at the politico map and it says their town has ZERO votes for Ron. Now i know that there isn’t corruption on voting in that little town, so where they reported it must be. What do I do, anyone know???
Moreover, when Sutton had been found out, they quickly added 31 votes, and cited ‘human error.’ What is their excuse for this source, now showing Greenville at 25 votes:
The problem is, you have to take what they told you but can't verify it. They could tell you it's zero, that forgery is easy to be find out. They could also tell you it's 31 (or 25) then it is hard for you to confirm it's a rigging while the real votes may be 131 or 125.
-----------------
This is a covert totalitarian country. They select president by rigged election. (They control the voting office by intelligence) and justify the result by fake poll. (They manipulate public opinion by media)
And on 10/30, there is a quake the epicenter just 7 miles from my house.
