Post new topicReply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
 
 
 
 
Author Message

Computer_Guy
B.V. Info-a-holic
B.V. Info-a-holic



Joined: Sep 28, 2001
Posts: 7863
Location: US

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 4:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
 
Olbermann: Bush Administration “Allowed 9/11 Attacks To Occur”


Oh this is really good Exclamation Laughing Olbermann just rip's a hole into McCains ass Exclamation


Quote:
Olbermann said that the anniversary of the September 11 attacks had been turned into a brand name - “9/11™” and that such propaganda has “sustained a President that long ago should have been dismissed or impeached.”

Olbermann continued, identifying 9/11 has the only thing that has kept “(Bush) and his gang of financial and constitutional crooks in office,” while they escaped blame for the “malfeasance and criminal neglect that allowed the attacks to occur.”


Here is the video of the broadcast.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNx22TH7FfU
 

_________________
Mankind must put an end to war, or war will put an end to mankind.

JFK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message

Computer_Guy
B.V. Info-a-holic
B.V. Info-a-holic



Joined: Sep 28, 2001
Posts: 7863
Location: US

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 4:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
 
Significant New Information Details CIA Criminal Culpability in Allowing the 9/11 Attacks!


WASHINGTON, Sept 08, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Palo Alto Publishing will hold a press conference on September 11, 2008, at 9 AM at the National Press Club at 529 14th St. NW, Washington D.C., to detail new information revealed since the release of the 9/11 Commission Report. Entirely sourced from government reports, court documents, and the account of FBI Agent Ali Soufan, this analysis, never before fully detailed, shows that CIA officers, working through liaisons at FBI Headquarters, had repeatedly and criminally obstructed investigations that could have prevented the attacks on 9/11.
This book details the numerous times the CIA interacted with the FBI. In particular, the times lead FBI Cole investigator, Ali Soufan, made several official requests to the CIA: one through FBI Director Freeh, asking for any information the CIA had on an al Qaeda meeting in Kuala Lumpur and on Khallad Bin Attash, (at that time thought to be mastermind on the Cole bombing).
Despite the fact that the CIA did indeed have this information, they either denied its existence or refused to respond to Soufan's requests. The CIA withheld material information from an ongoing FBI investigation, which was a crime, and not due to the fact that "the CIA did not talk to the FBI", as suggested by the 9/11 Commission report.
In July 2001, emails between high-level CIA managers and CIA officers, entered into evidence in the Moussaoui trial, indicated that Mihdhar was going to take part in the next big al Qaeda attack. When these CIA officers requested permission to transfer this information to the FBI, they were denied. Yet, at almost the same time, CIA Director Tenet was holding meetings at the White House describing a huge al Qaeda attack about to take place inside of the US.
On August 22, 2001, when the CIA discovered that both Mihdhar and Hazmi were in the US, the CIA knew they were here to take part in a huge al Qaeda attack. Yet, the CIA, working with FBI IOS agents at FBI HQ, sabotaged the last chance FBI Cole investigators would have to investigate Mihdhar and prevent the attacks on 9/11. The CIA concealed the photograph of Khallad taken at Kuala Lumpur that connected Mihdhar to the planning of the Cole bombing. FBI HQ agents also concealed the fact that they had received the NSA release from the NSA caveats the very day they told the FBI Cole investigators they were forbidden from investigating Mihdhar, due to NSA caveats. FBI HQ agents then fabricated a NSLU ruling, and told the FBI Cole investigators that the NSLU had ruled they were not allowed to be part of any investigation for Mihdhar when in fact the NSLU attorneys had ruled just the opposite, and stated to FBI IG investigators that the Cole investigators could have been part of the investigation for Mihdhar, since the NSA information had no FISA component. [9/11 Commission report, Footnote 81, p 581]
This new information shows that almost 3000 innocent people in the US paid, with their lives, for the actions at the CIA and FBI HQ, actions that should have been uncovered by the 9/11 Commission, using the very same new information, easily obtainable with their subpoena powers.
This criminal activity was carried out by individuals at the CIA Bin Laden unit, the CIA Yemen station, high level managers at the CIA, who prevented the transfer of information regarding the Kuala Lumpur meeting to the FBI investigators, the FBI Bin laden unit, the FBI RFU and even by the Director of the FBI.
All of this new information is detailed in "Prior Knowledge of 9/11" at www.eventson911.com by Robert Schopmeyer, owner of an EDA software company in Silicon Valley.
SOURCE Palo Alto Publishing
http://www.eventson911.com

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/significant-new-information-details-cia/story.aspx?guid=%7BFBC51EE0-675F-4C4B-9FB1-DBA2CBE39FE1%7D&dist=hppr
 

_________________
Mankind must put an end to war, or war will put an end to mankind.

JFK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message

theking
B.V. Info Seeker
B.V. Info Seeker



Joined: Aug 19, 2008
Posts: 560
Location: Washington, D.C.

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
 
So is it the CIA or is it Bush?

The ball stopped somewhere, so who is it?
 

_________________
"Sleep, and you will never awake anew."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message

martiandrifter01
B.V. Info Seeker
B.V. Info Seeker



Joined: Mar 28, 2008
Posts: 706
Location: Xanthe Terra, Sol IV/Mars

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
 
Computer_Guy wrote:
WASHINGTON, Sept 08, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Palo Alto Publishing will hold a press conference on September 11, 2008, at 9 AM at the National Press Club at 529 14th St. NW,

Funny, I don't recall hearing anything from Palo Alto today, and I caught the addresses on Headline News...

As for the rest of the article: If true, it sounds like a typical US bureaucratic SNAFU, or jurisdictional fight similar to the one in New Orleans after Katrina hit. We've never, historically speaking, been able to coordinate one agency with another long enough to do more than tie a shoelace. Hey, maybe that's why the lace-in boot zippers were so popular!

Hey tk, that was a good point: the ball's not stopping anywhere predictable, kinda like a roulette wheel. Next it'll be Palin's fault because she shot Osama's pet moose.
 

_________________


Just for fun, and maybe a chance to learn a little solar system astronomy...
martiandrifter.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Author Message

theking
B.V. Info Seeker
B.V. Info Seeker



Joined: Aug 19, 2008
Posts: 560
Location: Washington, D.C.

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
 
martiandrifter01 wrote:
Computer_Guy wrote:
WASHINGTON, Sept 08, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Palo Alto Publishing will hold a press conference on September 11, 2008, at 9 AM at the National Press Club at 529 14th St. NW,

Funny, I don't recall hearing anything from Palo Alto today, and I caught the addresses on Headline News...

As for the rest of the article: If true, it sounds like a typical US bureaucratic SNAFU, or jurisdictional fight similar to the one in New Orleans after Katrina hit. We've never, historically speaking, been able to coordinate one agency with another long enough to do more than tie a shoelace. Hey, maybe that's why the lace-in boot zippers were so popular!

Hey tk, that was a good point: the ball's not stopping anywhere predictable, kinda like a roulette wheel. Next it'll be Palin's fault because she shot Osama's pet moose.


Hmmm.

I could see why osama would be mad about his pet moose.
 

_________________
"Sleep, and you will never awake anew."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message

Computer_Guy
B.V. Info-a-holic
B.V. Info-a-holic



Joined: Sep 28, 2001
Posts: 7863
Location: US

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
 
theking wrote:
So is it the CIA or is it Bush?

The ball stopped somewhere, so who is it?




Good question why don't you find out?
 

_________________
Mankind must put an end to war, or war will put an end to mankind.

JFK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message

Computer_Guy
B.V. Info-a-holic
B.V. Info-a-holic



Joined: Sep 28, 2001
Posts: 7863
Location: US

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
 
martiandrifter01 wrote:
Computer_Guy wrote:
WASHINGTON, Sept 08, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Palo Alto Publishing will hold a press conference on September 11, 2008, at 9 AM at the National Press Club at 529 14th St. NW,

Funny, I don't recall hearing anything from Palo Alto today, and I caught the addresses on Headline News...

As for the rest of the article: If true, it sounds like a typical US bureaucratic SNAFU, or jurisdictional fight similar to the one in New Orleans after Katrina hit. We've never, historically speaking, been able to coordinate one agency with another long enough to do more than tie a shoelace. Hey, maybe that's why the lace-in boot zippers were so popular!

Hey tk, that was a good point: the ball's not stopping anywhere predictable, kinda like a roulette wheel. Next it'll be Palin's fault because she shot Osama's pet moose.



Posted as a related article, I have no idea if things went off as planned.
 

_________________
Mankind must put an end to war, or war will put an end to mankind.

JFK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message

theking
B.V. Info Seeker
B.V. Info Seeker



Joined: Aug 19, 2008
Posts: 560
Location: Washington, D.C.

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
 
Computer_Guy wrote:
theking wrote:
So is it the CIA or is it Bush?

The ball stopped somewhere, so who is it?




Good question why don't you find out?


We already know.

Infact, the administration has already come out and SAID where the ball was dropped. Did you even read the 9/11 report? No you didn't.

This is why conspiracy theorists are so retarded. They don't actually read.
 

_________________
"Sleep, and you will never awake anew."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message

Computer_Guy
B.V. Info-a-holic
B.V. Info-a-holic



Joined: Sep 28, 2001
Posts: 7863
Location: US

PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
 
theking wrote:
Computer_Guy wrote:
theking wrote:
So is it the CIA or is it Bush?

The ball stopped somewhere, so who is it?




Good question why don't you find out?


We already know.

Infact, the administration has already come out and SAID where the ball was dropped. Did you even read the 9/11 report? No you didn't.

This is why conspiracy theorists are so retarded. They don't actually read.




So lets see your whole argument is completely based on a hand picked group of people selected by the accused administration Question

And on that basis you have concluded you know the whole story, and everyone else and thier evidence is discardable matieral.

Yeah............thanks for your input, you can go back to your video game now.
 

_________________
Mankind must put an end to war, or war will put an end to mankind.

JFK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message

martiandrifter01
B.V. Info Seeker
B.V. Info Seeker



Joined: Mar 28, 2008
Posts: 706
Location: Xanthe Terra, Sol IV/Mars

PostPosted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 12:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
 
C_G, a lot of this comes down to how reliable and creditable the sources are. Quite a bit of the stuff floating around the Web is, as you know, questionable at best. The Government staffers that gave us the 9/11 report have been through background checks the public doesn't even know exist. The 'journalists' that wrote a lot of the 'evidence' reports are actively chasing fame and fortune and frequently unafraid to distort facts to support ludicrous stories.

I never read the full 9/11 report; instead I went with what I beheld on the news, the eye witness testimony given to at least a dozen newspapers and television stations by the people that were there, and their rescuers. Also the statements of the airline workers and airport workers who had contact with the terrorists that hijacked the planes.

Seven years have passed and tales grow with the telling. Greedy sensationalists in the broadcast media and all over the Web, out to make names for themselves, discredit an administration they don't like, or slam the United States in general, have spun whatever evidence they may have had so many ways it's impossible to tell if they ever HAD any evidence of any kind!

For what it's worth, some of the locals here (employees of a former USAAF base turned civil airport) met the terrorist pilot trainees and turned them down as they had no positive identification (green cards, valid driver's licenses, etc.) and these locals refused to be bought. Score one for the Southern redneck patriots!

I wish they'd had a hungry alligator handy, it would've spared everyone a lot of grief.
 

_________________


Just for fun, and maybe a chance to learn a little solar system astronomy...
martiandrifter.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Author Message

Computer_Guy
B.V. Info-a-holic
B.V. Info-a-holic



Joined: Sep 28, 2001
Posts: 7863
Location: US

PostPosted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 9:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
 
martiandrifter01 wrote:
C_G, a lot of this comes down to how reliable and creditable the sources are. Quite a bit of the stuff floating around the Web is, as you know, questionable at best. The Government staffers that gave us the 9/11 report have been through background checks the public doesn't even know exist. The 'journalists' that wrote a lot of the 'evidence' reports are actively chasing fame and fortune and frequently unafraid to distort facts to support ludicrous stories.

I never read the full 9/11 report; instead I went with what I beheld on the news, the eye witness testimony given to at least a dozen newspapers and television stations by the people that were there, and their rescuers. Also the statements of the airline workers and airport workers who had contact with the terrorists that hijacked the planes.

Seven years have passed and tales grow with the telling. Greedy sensationalists in the broadcast media and all over the Web, out to make names for themselves, discredit an administration they don't like, or slam the United States in general, have spun whatever evidence they may have had so many ways it's impossible to tell if they ever HAD any evidence of any kind!

For what it's worth, some of the locals here (employees of a former USAAF base turned civil airport) met the terrorist pilot trainees and turned them down as they had no positive identification (green cards, valid driver's licenses, etc.) and these locals refused to be bought. Score one for the Southern redneck patriots!

I wish they'd had a hungry alligator handy, it would've spared everyone a lot of grief.




You are wrong on so many counts I'm not even going to bother wading into it. One thing is for sure! If you wanted to know anything even close to the truth you would by now. As it stands you were fed a line of BS, and you bought it whole heartedly. So be it your a mental casualty of the war being waged on America, it's heritage and it's people.


Last edited by Computer_Guy on Sat Sep 13, 2008 11:55 am; edited 1 time in total
 

_________________
Mankind must put an end to war, or war will put an end to mankind.

JFK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message

theking
B.V. Info Seeker
B.V. Info Seeker



Joined: Aug 19, 2008
Posts: 560
Location: Washington, D.C.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 11:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
 
Computer_Guy wrote:
theking wrote:
Computer_Guy wrote:
theking wrote:
So is it the CIA or is it Bush?

The ball stopped somewhere, so who is it?




Good question why don't you find out?


We already know.

Infact, the administration has already come out and SAID where the ball was dropped. Did you even read the 9/11 report? No you didn't.

This is why conspiracy theorists are so retarded. They don't actually read.




So lets see your whole argument is completely based on a hand picked group of people selected by the accused administration Question

And on that basis you have concluded you know the whole story, and everyone else and thier evidence is discardable matieral.

Yeah............thanks for your input, you can go back to your video game now.


An admission of guilt, is, well, an admission of guilt.

Because, it is without a doubt, in my head, you don't know anything about how the adminstration blew 9/11. The sad thing is all the information is readily available ON THE NET, you know, that thing where you get ALL of your information from?

1) Who supplied the information on possible WTC attacks?
2) Which federal branch recieved this information and had it fowarded to both the CIA and NSA.
3) Which federal branch was ordered to stand down on immediate action?
4) What did the NSA do with said information?
5) What did the CIA do with said information?

These questions are all answered within the 9/11 report itself. And I bet you don't know the answer to any of them.
 

_________________
"Sleep, and you will never awake anew."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message

Computer_Guy
B.V. Info-a-holic
B.V. Info-a-holic



Joined: Sep 28, 2001
Posts: 7863
Location: US

PostPosted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 12:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
 
theking wrote:
Computer_Guy wrote:
theking wrote:
Computer_Guy wrote:
theking wrote:
So is it the CIA or is it Bush?

The ball stopped somewhere, so who is it?




Good question why don't you find out?


We already know.

Infact, the administration has already come out and SAID where the ball was dropped. Did you even read the 9/11 report? No you didn't.

This is why conspiracy theorists are so retarded. They don't actually read.




So lets see your whole argument is completely based on a hand picked group of people selected by the accused administration Question

And on that basis you have concluded you know the whole story, and everyone else and thier evidence is discardable matieral.

Yeah............thanks for your input, you can go back to your video game now.


An admission of guilt, is, well, an admission of guilt.

Because, it is without a doubt, in my head, you don't know anything about how the adminstration blew 9/11. The sad thing is all the information is readily available ON THE NET, you know, that thing where you get ALL of your information from?

1) Who supplied the information on possible WTC attacks?
2) Which federal branch recieved this information and had it fowarded to both the CIA and NSA.
3) Which federal branch was ordered to stand down on immediate action?
4) What did the NSA do with said information?
5) What did the CIA do with said information?

These questions are all answered within the 9/11 report itself. And I bet you don't know the answer to any of them.




Wrong Man! I have been posting all that information and more for ten years on this site. This site has been through about four or five major changes in that time. It's quite likely I have 50,000 posts or more in those total years. I have read everything the governments put out numerous times. But unlike yourself, I have also looked at hundreds of times more availible evidence that the government has totally excluded from it's so called WhiteWash/Investigation.
 

_________________
Mankind must put an end to war, or war will put an end to mankind.

JFK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message

screamzero
B.V. Info Seeker
B.V. Info Seeker



Joined: Feb 08, 2008
Posts: 2178

PostPosted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
 
 

_________________
Common Law Rules
http://www.svpvril.com/OACL.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Author Message

theking
B.V. Info Seeker
B.V. Info Seeker



Joined: Aug 19, 2008
Posts: 560
Location: Washington, D.C.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 9:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
 
Computer_Guy wrote:
theking wrote:
Computer_Guy wrote:
theking wrote:
Computer_Guy wrote:
theking wrote:
So is it the CIA or is it Bush?

The ball stopped somewhere, so who is it?




Good question why don't you find out?


We already know.

Infact, the administration has already come out and SAID where the ball was dropped. Did you even read the 9/11 report? No you didn't.

This is why conspiracy theorists are so retarded. They don't actually read.




So lets see your whole argument is completely based on a hand picked group of people selected by the accused administration Question

And on that basis you have concluded you know the whole story, and everyone else and thier evidence is discardable matieral.

Yeah............thanks for your input, you can go back to your video game now.


An admission of guilt, is, well, an admission of guilt.

Because, it is without a doubt, in my head, you don't know anything about how the adminstration blew 9/11. The sad thing is all the information is readily available ON THE NET, you know, that thing where you get ALL of your information from?

1) Who supplied the information on possible WTC attacks?
2) Which federal branch recieved this information and had it fowarded to both the CIA and NSA.
3) Which federal branch was ordered to stand down on immediate action?
4) What did the NSA do with said information?
5) What did the CIA do with said information?

These questions are all answered within the 9/11 report itself. And I bet you don't know the answer to any of them.




Wrong Man! I have been posting all that information and more for ten years on this site. This site has been through about four or five major changes in that time. It's quite likely I have 50,000 posts or more in those total years. I have read everything the governments put out numerous times. But unlike yourself, I have also looked at hundreds of times more availible evidence that the government has totally excluded from it's so called WhiteWash/Investigation.


Well then.

Some of these are simple short sentence answers.

Can you answer one, or are you just going to keep telling me you know?
 

_________________
"Sleep, and you will never awake anew."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
 
 
 
 
Post new topicReply to topic
Display posts from previous:   
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Page 3 of 5
 
 
 
 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 

 
 

 


Powered by © phpBB
Interface Design (IX) by Kenetix, Kenetix.Net
 
   

blocks-left.jpg
  Black Vault Radio  
 
 
Download FREE On Demand Radio!

Now Playing: Episode #44 - People Speak Out Edition! (11/03/2008)

Program Archives

Get BVRN on YOUR WEBSITE!


Subscribe to the RSS/XML BVRN feed for iTunes or any other podcast software

 
 

blocks-left.jpg
  Member Console  
 
   
Register Here
Lost Password

 
Membership:
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Waiting User(s): 2
Total Members: 36,386
Latest User: Tred

Most Ever Online:
Guest(s): 966
Member(s): 15
Total: 981

Online Stats:
Guest(s): 88
Member(s): 8
Hidden: 5
Total: 96
 
 

blocks-left.jpg
  Search for ANYONE