USA Accelerates its screamble for scraps in Asia Pacific | World Politics | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
USA Accelerates its screamble for scraps in Asia Pacific
July 15, 2012
4:15 am
Avatar
rath
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4297
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The US Accelerates its Scramble for Southeast Asia

The USA on the verge of collapse, with high unemployment & a failing economy & falling living standards
Scramble for scraps & trade deals in Southeast Asia & the Pacific in the hopes it's plans to engage Southeast Asia & the Pacific will help turn around the fledgling US state.

Also putting all their hopes in Southeast Asia & the South Pacific are the fledgling & decimated economy's of Europe, with the likes of Germany's chancellor Angela Merkel also making a visit to Southeast Asia with cap in hand hopping for trade deals to prop up the European nations & the European Union, in a hope to starve of further collapse of Europe into Irrelevance.

But The question that keeps popping up.

Has the USA & Europe ignored Asia & the Pacific for to long, to their own detriment.

Asian & pacific nation are the powers of the new world & it's unclear why they would need The USA & Europe.

The USA & Europe ignored the Asian & Pacific nations for much part of the last century.

Only now to come begging caps in hand for whatever scraps of trade they can get from the powerful nations, & trade blocks of Southeast Asia & the South Pacific.

But it remains the issue, having grown their nations on their on steam & know how without any help from The USA or Europe, how does the USA & Europe think the Nations of Asean & Apec now need their participation in our trading blocks.

The USA & Europe ignored Asia & the South Pacific for their own benefit for decades. & now that benefit has turned into their detriment.

The USA & Europe now find their economy's have collapsed & their nations in turmoil & catastrophic, their citizens have no work & they are losing their homes, their security & their hope.

& in a last ditched attempt to hold off the collapse of their nations.

The likes of the USA, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, England, Greece & the many other Bankrupt nations of the world go begging for a trade deal with the nations of South East Asia & the South Pacific, only to find the rich nations of Southeast Asia & the South Pacific, now hold all the cards, & the USA & Europe must dance for their dinner.

If they are ever going to get do trade & gain entry in Southeast Asia & the South Pacific.

& with the Likes of China & Russia already having a strong presents in that region already, It will not be easy.

July 15, 2012
4:17 am
Avatar
rath
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4297
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

July 14, 2012

The US Accelerates its Scramble for Southeast Asia

Before flying into Cambodia, Ms. Hillary had visited three other countries neighboring with China – Mongolia, Vietnam and Laos - becoming the first US State Secretary to visit the latter country in 57 years (after John Foster Dulles who visited Laos in 1955). All three visits as well as her participation in the ASEAN forum had one specific goal in mind (although not always explicitly expressed) – that is, containing China.

The US...is increasing its military presence in the area by positioning its warships in Singapore, increasing the number of marines stationed in Australia, working out plans to rebuild their naval and air force bases in the Philippines along with the...Cam Ranh base in Vietnam.

On Wednesday, the US took two symbolic steps aimed at further warming up its relationship with Myanmar.. Then the first US ambassador to that country in 22 years, 47-year-old Derek Mitchell, who formerly was President Barack Obama's special envoy to Myanmar, arrived in the country in an ambassadorial capacity. On the same day, President Obama announced that US companies will now be allowed to "responsibly do business in Burma".

The lifting of the sanctions, which except entities belonging to the army or ministry of defense, gives US firms a go-ahead to invest in projects with the state-owned Myanma Oil and Gas Enterprise, reports the Associated Press. The move is regarded as controversial since Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi last month explicitly urged foreign firms not to do business with the enterprise.

But surely, when dominance in the north-western part of the Indian Ocean is at stake, the US is always ready to forget about human rights and easily disregard human rights activists' calls.

The fact that the stakes are really high is in no doubt. Myanmar is a pivotal country in the region, and not only because of its natural and mineral wealth, but also because it occupies a strategic place. For years, it was almost solely dominated by China, which saw it as a bypass enabling it to avoid shipment of goods via the narrow Malacca Strait teeming with pirates and US warships.

The US "strategic pivot" and shift of foreign policy focus to the Asia-Pacific rim announced by the US administration in November of last year is clearly demonstrated both by the new developments in US–Myanmar (although still stubbornly called Burma in the West) relations and by the current voyage of US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton who on Thursday arrived in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, where the ASEAN foreign ministers' meeting is under way.

Before coming to Cambodia, Ms. Hillary had visited three other countries neighboring with China – Mongolia, Vietnam and Laos - becoming the first US State Secretary to visit the latter country in 57 years (after John Foster Dulles who visited Laos in 1955). All three visits as well as her participation in the ASEAN forum had one specific goal in mind (although not always explicitly expressed) – that is, containing China.

In Mongolia, Ms. Clinton praised the country as a "democratic model for Asia". Vietnam is a long-time competitor of China in the region, and all the latest US diplomatic efforts have been directed at forging a kind of anti-Chinese alliance with the former foe in the war of the 1960s and 1970s up to returning the navy and air force base at Cam Ranh to US control. Laos, which is only beginning to open up for US diplomacy, occupies a strategic place under China's soft belly. Therefore, it makes a valuable addition to the US policy of surrounding China.

The acceleration of US diplomatic efforts in the region fell on fertile ground. Relations between China and its neighbors, most notably in the South China Sea, have seriously deteriorated in recent months. China has territorial disputes with almost all other littoral countries, and this has more than once led to balancing on the brink of an open military confrontation – both with immediate neighbors and some other Asian powers, including India.

Earlier this week, the ASEAN ministers adopted a code of conduct for resolving conflicts in the disputed waters. Now, "little remains to be done" but persuading China to abide by the code.

The US in its turn is increasing its military presence in the area by positioning its warships in Singapore, increasing the number of marines stationed in Australia, working out plans to rebuild their naval and air force bases in the Philippines along with the above mentioned Cam Ranh base in Vietnam.

Chinese media were quick to react to Ms. Hillary's activity. On Thursday, as reported by Reuters, the leading Chinese newspaper People's Daily published a piece signed by the pen name "Zhong Sheng", meaning "Voice of China". The paper slammed Hillary Clinton for comments she made lauding democracy and implicitly criticizing restrictions in China.

"Who is the United States to haughtily appraise Asia's democratic position?" Reuters quotes the newspaper as saying.

It goes on further to state that the US has ulterior motives for pushing democracy in Asia.

"In reality, lauding democracy and holding the flag for human rights is an important part of the US 'return to Asia' strategy," says the commentary.

In fact, while US strategic goals in the area are obvious, for the countries of the region the situation presents a choice between two evils – that is, either further confrontation with China, or relying on the assistance of a more powerful ally who is unlikely to stop in its push for dominance in the region or simply driving China away. US help is never provided free of any charge, and the fee may be even higher than the cost of a standoff with China.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
41 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10232

bionic: 9870

at1with0: 9243

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 24033

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8704

Posts: 123401

Newest Members:

ieltsalama, Dawn Marie, fostercandy, ieltsbiboh, ielts, mysentiments, Lori Jean, Lucrezia Borgia, Amitabh, Brian Roberts

Administrators: John Greenewald: 570, blackvault: 1776