USSUBCOM: Unknown Contacts | Unidentified Flying Objects | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_Related Related Topics sp_TopicIcon
USSUBCOM: Unknown Contacts
August 30, 2017
7:26 pm
Avatar
magonia17
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 189
Member Since:
December 2, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

We have all heard of the term UFO but almost nothing is known or released officially concerning unknowns detected by sonar under our owns which over a large percentage of this world.

So I began my question to see if any official information could be released. I filed a FOIA request to the Chief of Naval Operations, Washington DC. for records pertaining to known/unknown contacts within the territorial waters of the United States for a period of 30 days. The request was transferred to the Submarine Force Pacific Fleet COMSUBPAC.

The Commander of COMSUBPAC responded via letter dated 13 July 2017 stating: " The Department of Defense has determined the existence of non existence of records, which would reveal a connection or interest in the matters set forth in your request, is classified......the Department of Defense neither confirms or denies that such records may or may not exist..." So my request denied. So I appealed it, and my appeal went to the Judge Advocate General, Washington Naval Yard. A response was swift, from the Director of JAG.

The missive dated August 22 2017 stated that COMSUBPAC response was termed a "Glomar" response from a court case pertaining to the CIA's classified project. Further they stated it would could harm if they answered by request, and that the information if it existed would fall under the exemption "(b)(1)" which means that the information is properly and currently classified in the interests of national defense. If potential responsive information qualifies as exemption (b)(1) there is "no discretion" regarding its release. Further they stated the "request for sonar contacts data related to military operations if it exists, fits squarely within this category of information that could cause serious damage to national security."

So it seems that unknowns under the ocean are classifiable the fact they have information on such contacts is a secret within it self.....nothing to unknowns in the ocean, think again.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
43 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10083

bionic: 9870

at1with0: 9242

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3271

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 22933

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8263

Posts: 120885

Newest Members:

Kirsten, Oscar, BlackVault Investigator, alienmint.com, Kristen, Kaila_Kelly-Palencia, Charlotte Beattie, Carole Willis, Teodoro, Meyer72

Administrators: John Greenewald: 393, blackvault: 1777