WikiLeaks dumps Syrian emails | The War on Terrorism Homeland Security | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
WikiLeaks dumps Syrian emails
July 5, 2012
1:39 pm
Avatar
rath
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4297
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

July 5, 2012.

WikiLeaks says it is publishing over two million emails from Syrian political figures dating back to 2006 amid the bloody crackdown on dissent by Syria's ruling regime.

"Just now ... WikiLeaks began publishing the Syria files, more than two million emails from Syrian political figures, ministries and associated companies dating from August 2006 to March 2012," spokeswoman Sarah Harrison told journalists in London.

Harrison told journalists the emails reveal interactions between the Syrian government and Western companies.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who is currently seeking asylum at the Ecuadorean embassy in London, was not at the brief presentation.

He is wanted by British police for possible extradition to Sweden to face questions about alleged sexual misconduct there.

Harrison acknowledged that WikiLeaks is facing "a difficult time at the moment" but said "we are continuing to work through that".

July 5, 2012
2:42 pm
Avatar
ricardo
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1493
Member Since:
December 11, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

IRAN might as well come clean now. we know there is going to be some
" smoking gun " implicating Iran in all sorts of nefarious shady dealing...

involving ...all things nuclear , all things Hezbollah , gun and drug smuggling,
and forced prostitution to round out the bunch. why this intel didn't come out
sooner , I have no idea. ( make believe leverage ,courtesy cyber force)

Iran did it . confess now ! :naughty:

red flag rag

opinion.

July 12, 2012
12:08 am
Avatar
ricardo
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1493
Member Since:
December 11, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

bradley manning and Julian assange - not so much exculpatory evidence
denied for manning but deceptions necessary to obfuscate directors of the operation. logically , anything that tangibly exculpates , manning,
will lead to the main actors .

July 14, 2012
5:22 am
Avatar
rath
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4297
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

"ricardo" wrote: bradley manning and Julian assange - not so much exculpatory evidence
denied for manning but deceptions necessary to obfuscate directors of the operation. logically , anything that tangibly exculpates , manning,
will lead to the main actors .

The fact is Manning has never implicated Julian Assange in any of his acts.

Thus there is no Prima Facie case against Assange.

Like i said in other topics about Wikileaks.

There is no evidence that Manning gave Any of the classified documents to Julian Assange.

& for all we know Manning gave the documents to China or Russia or a terrorist group who sort to make the documents public for their own reasons. ( &/or to humiliate the USA )

July 14, 2012
11:29 am
Avatar
ricardo
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1493
Member Since:
December 11, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

"rath" wrote: [quote="ricardo"]bradley manning and Julian assange - not so much exculpatory evidence
denied for manning but deceptions necessary to obfuscate directors of the operation. logically , anything that tangibly exculpates , manning,
will lead to the main actors .

The fact is Manning has never implicated Julian Assange in any of his acts.

Thus there is no Prima Facie case against Assange.

Like i said in other topics about Wikileaks.

There is no evidence that Manning gave Any of the classified documents to Julian Assange.

& for all we know Manning gave the documents to China or Russia or a terrorist group who sort to make the documents public for their own reasons. ( &/or to humiliate the USA )

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My posit is, there is Internet dialogue that will definitively imply 3rd party direction.not post leak activity. In my opinion mil.prosecutors on the east coast know this.Pollard one of Americas most prolific spy's, based on level and amount of data lost. Was granted A interview from wolf blitzed CNN. Not long after arrest. The data loss alone was and is considerable In damage. He's alive . Wasnt put to death. Curious why manning was in total isolation months ,for low level classified data, the experts say caused little if no harm At all .

July 14, 2012
8:10 pm
Avatar
greeney2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 10196
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hey lets let every kid in Highschool joyride in your car everynight, if they bring it back clean. Laugh

Is there a difference if you rob a bank of $10,000 and rob another one that only has $10 in the till?
Both are the same Federal bank robbery crime!

Is there a difference between shooting someone and they survive and shooting at someone and missing their head by 1/4"? Both are the same crime, attempted murder!

Is there a diffence when 3 parties conspire a crime, they are not equally guilty?

July 15, 2012
4:36 am
Avatar
rath
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4297
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

"greeney2" wrote: Hey lets let every kid in Highschool joyride in your car everynight, if they bring it back clean. Laugh

Is there a difference if you rob a bank of $10,000 and rob another one that only has $10 in the till?
Both are the same Federal bank robbery crime!

Is there a difference between shooting someone and they survive and shooting at someone and missing their head by 1/4"? Both are the same crime, attempted murder!

Is there a diffence when 3 parties conspire a crime, they are not equally guilty?

No

Wrong ... wrong ... wrong.

Is there a difference between shooting someone and they survive and shooting at someone and missing their head by 1/4"? Both are the same crime, attempted murder!

There is a difference. DER.

it all depends on the circumstance of the crime, & any mitigating facts.

Is there a difference if you rob a bank of $10,000 and rob another one that only has $10 in the till?
Both are the same Federal bank robbery crime!

& again yes there is a difference.

Circumstance of the crime & facts facts facts ........

How was the bank robbed & where from .... Via the internet ( internet crime ) & from what country was the bank robbed .... USA, Canada, Australia, England. = OR = China, Russia, Libya, Columbia, Ethiopia.

Different jurisdictions have different laws.

& a crime in one country may not always be a crime in another.

But we have been over that have we not. ( Sweden, & rape laws age of consent & bestiality )

January 2, 2015
12:54 pm
Avatar
Arjumand
New Member
Members
Forum Posts: 0
Member Since:
January 2, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Bradley Manning is an American, so the usa can do with him as they please.

But i find it sad & pathetic that Bradly Manning, would implicate an Innocent man like Julian Assange. Just to get his name in the lime light & feel a little famous.

Why Bradley Manning feels the need to lie & make up story's, claiming other people were part of his treasonous plot.

January 3, 2015
2:57 am
Avatar
greeney2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 10196
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

That is very funny, seeing as the the United States has nothing to do with Julian Assange being a fugitive from justice in the UK, on the run, and hiding in an Embassy for 2 years. In fact, his being a fugitive hiding in the UK, after violation of his bail in the UK court system, does not have a thing to do with Bradley Manning. He jumped bail, after the finding out the court, allowed his extradition to Sweden. No warrants or arrests are on file for Julian Assange from the United States, no extradition filing to the United States, in the UK or Sweden. No such thing at all, poor old innocent Julian Assange is wanted for rape questioning in Sweden, took his case all the way to the UK Supreme Court and lost, and not a single part of it is related to Bradley Manning, The USA, or any court in the USA.

It would appear your hero is not so innocent, and even his old coworkers have made statements about his womanizing and other rapes. When your friends say these things about you, don't blame the United States.

Three guesses who you are and where you are from. 🙄

April 3, 2015
7:04 am
Avatar
alishba
New Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2
Member Since:
April 2, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The now-empty "black sites" in unidentified countries were used to detain suspects who were captured in the "war on terrorism" launched by former President George W. Bush after the Sept. 11 attacks.

ALISHBAA

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
56 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10196

bionic: 9870

at1with0: 9243

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 23820

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8614

Posts: 122991

Newest Members:

Beechy, Film, melisablaise, Brian, Al Staton, lonell, Ielts4t, ieltstips, Maryann Cassidy, Myron L. Des Jarlais

Administrators: John Greenewald: 537, blackvault: 1776