White House weighs release of bin Laden pics | The War on Terrorism Homeland Security | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
White House weighs release of bin Laden pics
May 3, 2011
6:57 pm
Avatar
greeney2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 10232
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Already just on our board, old fake pictures were posted of Bin Laden, I think go back to Afganistan invasion times. So far, this is the position about releasing photos, which I hope they decide to do.

White House weighs release of bin Laden pics
By Zachary Roth
ShareretweetEmailPrintBy Zachary Roth zachary Roth – 24 mins ago

Over 36 hours after Osama bin Laden's death was announced, the Obama administration is still mulling whether to release photos of the terror leader's corpse.

"There is no update on [whether] to release the photos," a White House spokesman told reporters in an email this morning. "If or when there's more to say, we'll let you know."

At issue are three sets of photos, CNN has reported: one from the raid in which bin Laden was killed, one from an Afghan hangar where his body taken, and one from his burial at sea.

It appears more likely than not that at least some of the images will be released. Although U.S. officials have said a DNA match established bin Laden's identity with 99.9-percent certainty, they understand that making the photos public could help put an end to lingering skepticism about whether or not the al Qaeda leader is really dead. A spokesman for the Taliban has said there's no proof that the killing happened. And some American conservatives have suggested that more evidence is needed to convince them.

"We are going to do everything we can to make sure that nobody has any basis to try to deny that we got Osama bin Laden," White House counter-terror adviser John Brennan said yesterday. "Whether that includes photographs--this is something to be determined."

Brennan also said that the images could jeopardize similar operations and intelligence sources in the future. But the significant concern appears to be that releasing the photos--especially because of their gruesome nature--has the potential to further inflame al Qaeda sympathizers and serve as a rallying point for jihadis. Bin Laden is said to have a gaping head wound over his left eye, with brains and blood visible where a bullet penetrated his skull.

Indeed, a senior U.S. official told CNN that the picture in which bin Laden is most recognizable--taken on the hangar--is also the grisliest, so it couldn't be published on the front page of the newspaper.

Underlining the issue's complexity, Steven Aftergood, a leading open government advocate who runs the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists, told the Lookout that despite his default belief in transparency, he's not eager to see the photos make public.

He said the issue is different from the one over declassifying images showing harsh interrogation techniques—something his organization strongly supported. The government's effort to withhold those photos, he said "was part of effort to suppress the reality of U.S. interrogation policy." By contrast, in the case of the bin Laden photos, he said, the call for their release is less about an important principle of transparency and more about "prurient interest."

Aftergood argued that releasing the photos wouldn't change many minds about whether bin Laden is really dead—or at least not enough to merit adding to an unhealthy sense of triumphalism among those who consider the killing long-awaited vengeance for the 9/11 attacks.

"I don't want to see bloody heads on T-shirts and posters," he said. (Indeed, merchandise celebrating the killing has already been made.)

But at least among lawmakers on Capitol Hill, there appears to be a growing sentiment that the pros of releasing the photos outweigh the cons.

"It may be necessary to release the pictures—as gruesome as they undoubtedly will be, because he's been shot in the head—to quell any doubts that this somehow is a ruse that the American government has carried out," Sen. Joe Lieberman, a Connecticut Indepedendent who chairs the Homeland Security Committee, said yesterday.

The top Republican on that committee, Sen. Susan Collins, a Maine Republican, agreed: "I recognize that there will be those who will try to generate this myth that he's alive, and that we missed him somehow, and in order to put that to rest it may be necessary to release some of the pictures, or video, or the DNA test," she said.

After Saddam Hussein's sons Uday and Qusay were killed by U.S. forces in 2003, images of their bodies were released, but only after they'd been touched up by a mortician.

(Image made from video broadcast on Oct. 7, 2001, showing Osama bin Laden at an undisclosed location.: AP/Al-Jazeera)

May 3, 2011
8:43 pm
Avatar
jdchaser
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 55
Member Since:
April 13, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Someone somewhere will leak them out somehow, so they might as well release them.

Why are you hiding the truth from me when I can see it in plain sight? The only thing this proves is how blind you really are.

May 25, 2011
7:31 am
Avatar
jwebb
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 215
Member Since:
April 18, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

You know what, even at the release of the photos of Osama Bin Laden's dead body, there will still be some kind of conspiracy of that aswell, hell they have video of JFK getting is brains blown out and look at all the crazy and wild conspiracies that came from that, true or not, hell my 9th grade teacher said that JFK wasn't even in the car! (We obviously know this isn't the case, but this is how crazy people are and will come up with anything and it will make headlines.) We've got some interesting conspiracies awaiting us the week of the release of the photos.

There can be no faith in government if our highest offices are excused from scrutiny - they should be setting the example of transparency.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online: Jamie
74 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10232

bionic: 9870

at1with0: 9243

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 24017

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8696

Posts: 123382

Newest Members:

Joanna, Melanie, chetney sessoms, Horatius, Express Documents, PaulDee094, Gary Wayne Ponder, AuthenticDocuments, matic mogan, nativembonyesiwe

Administrators: John Greenewald: 570, blackvault: 1776