Senate votes to block funds for Guantanamo closure HA HA HA | The War on Terrorism Homeland Security | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Senate votes to block funds for Guantanamo closure HA HA HA
May 20, 2009
9:39 pm
Avatar
Jaack
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 225
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Oh this is rich, Dear Reader [BO Obama] got congress to cover his ass on this one. Wait. I thought Dear Reader was going to bring peace a prosperity to the whole world???

Then WTF the D'Rats who have railed on Club Gitmo for years are now acting to keep prisoners there. Oh this is RICH, RICH I tell ya, RICH.

And screw McLame. He's tainted goods. His stay at Hanoi Hilton was nothing like the luxury these prisoners have. They get three hots and padded cots. Oh and the hots are halal, means good, basically screw ball for kosher.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id ... _article=1

Senate votes to block funds for Guantanamo closure

May 20 11:28 AM US/Eastern
By ANDREW TAYLOR
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - In a major rebuke to President Barack Obama, the Senate voted overwhelmingly on Wednesday to block the transfer of Guantanamo detainees to the United States and denied the administration the millions it sought to close the prison.

The 90-6 Senate vote—paired with similar House action last week—was a clear sign to Obama that he faces a tough fight getting the Democratic-controlled Congress to agree with his plans to shut down the detention center and move the 240 detainees.

Last month, Obama asked for $80 million for the Pentagon and the Justice Department to close the facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by January. In the eyes of the world, the prison has come to exemplify harsh U.S. anti-terror tactics and detention without trial for almost all of its inmates, most of whom were captured in Afghanistan.

The administration put its Democratic allies in a difficult spot by requesting the Guantanamo closure money before developing a plan for what to do with its detainees.

Obama is scheduled to give a major address Thursday outlining in more detail his plans for Guantanamo, but it's already clear that Congress has little appetite for bringing detainees to U.S. soil, even if the inmates would be held in maximum-security prisons.

The vote came as FBI Director Robert Mueller told Congress that he is concerned Guantanamo detainees could support terrorism if sent to the United States. Separately, a federal judge said the United States can continue to hold some prisoners at Guantanamo indefinitely without any charges.

In recent weeks, Republicans have called for keeping Guantanamo open, saying abuses at the facility are a thing of the past and describing it as a state-of-the-art prison that's nicer than some U.S. prisons. And they warn that terrorists who can't be convicted might be set free in the United States.

"The American people don't want these men walking the streets of America's neighborhoods," Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., said Wednesday. "The American people don't want these detainees held at a military base or federal prison in their backyard, either."

But Obama's new Pentagon policy chief, Michele Flournoy, said it's unrealistic to think that no detainees will come to the United States, and that the government can't ask allies to take detainees while refusing to take on the same burden.

Obama ally Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., pointed out that not a single prisoner has ever escaped from a federal "supermax" prison and that 347 convicted terrorists are already being held in U.S. prisons.

Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, among the few Republicans joining former GOP presidential nominee John McCain of Arizona in calling for Guantanamo to be closed, scoffed at the idea that the government can't find a way to hold Guantanamo prisoners in the United States. Graham noted that 400,000 German and Japanese prisoners were held during World War II.

"The idea that we cannot find a place to securely house 250-plus detainees within the United States is not rational. We have done this before," Graham said. "But it is my belief that you need a plan before you close Gitmo."

While allies such as Durbin have cast the development as a delay of only a few months, other Democrats have made it plain they don't want any of Guantanamo's detainees sent to the United States to stand trial or serve prison sentences.

What?

May 20, 2009
10:11 pm
Avatar
BloodStone
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1401
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Strange days indeed Laugh

BloodStone...

If it were raining hookers, I'd get hit by a fag.

May 21, 2009
12:18 pm
Avatar
Dark-Samus
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2494
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Well of course they did, as I`ve said I like Obamas ideas or solutions BUT he is taking to much at the same time and always results in a failure.
And this is his first setback from what I`ve said. 🙄
You are a human OBAMA not a fucking alien.

Truth doesn´t control you, you control it...

May 21, 2009
4:59 pm
Avatar
screamzero
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 531
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Ha -Ha -Ha! Laugh Obeamer brightens up. What a maroon.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
76 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10228

bionic: 9870

at1with0: 9243

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 23927

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8654

Posts: 123268

Newest Members:

jones30, Jasmine, Will, Hugo Mossner, John, Leylei, Vanessa, [email protected], Nick, mike

Administrators: John Greenewald: 558, blackvault: 1776