"TownHall.com" wrote: He's gutted their healthcare, plans to cut their pay and apparently, doesn't trust them either. David Codrea over at Gun Rights Examiner points out that Marines marching in President Obama's second inaugural parade recently were caring rifles without bolts, meaning they were removed.
“Didn't know the Marines had to take the bolts out of their rifles for the Inaugural,” an email forwarded to Gun Rights Examiner from a United States Marine Corps source observed. “Wonder if someone can explain why [they] would be marching in the inaugural parade with no bolts in their rifles!”
The email linked to a YouTube video of the 57th Presidential Inaugural Parade, embedded in this column, featuring Bravo Company Marines from the Marine Barracks Washington. Sure enough, the observation in the email is confirmed by watching the video, with screen shots provided in the photo and slide show accompanying this article.
This prompted an internet search to see if others had also noticed, and the Blur-Brain blog had.
“The bolts have been removed from the rifles rendering them unable to fire a round,” the post stated. “Apparently Obama’s Secret Service doesn’t trust the USMC. Simply searching each guy to make sure he didn’t have a live round hidden on him wasn’t enough, they had to make sure the guns were inoperable.
Wondering if this may be an inauguration policy of long standing that transcends administrations, Gun Rights Examiner made a cursory search and found something even more curious. In the 2009 Inaugural Parade, the United States Navy marched with rifles that had not been so disabled (see 1:24 into that video plus the final slide).
As Gateway Pundit points out, this isn't the first time Marines have been disarmed for an Obama administration event.
“In a sign of the nervousness surrounding Mr. Panetta’s trip, the Marines and other troops who were waiting in a tent for the defense secretary to speak were abruptly asked by their commander to get up, place their weapons — M-16 and M-4 automatic rifles and 9-mm pistols — outside the tent and then return unarmed. The commander, Sgt. Maj. Brandon Hall, told reporters he was acting on orders from superiors.
“All I know is, I was told to get the weapons out,” he said. Asked why, he replied, “Somebody got itchy, that’s all I’ve got to say. Somebody got itchy; we just adjust.”
Normally, American forces in Afghanistan keep their weapons with them when the defense secretary visits and speaks to them. The Afghans in the tent waiting for Mr. Panetta were not armed to begin with, as is typical.”
Source: http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavli ... m=facebook
Goodness me....so we are at the point of going over the top..to become as was Ancient Rome.
The Pratorian Guards and all that stuff. Everyone else unarmed in the presence of diety.
Someone here is afraid of a Coup d'état by the military because of the direction they intend to take the nation by "Entitlement."
I have stated in prior posts that there is a severe moral crisis as to fitness to govern when one does not trust the military or returning veterans and must brand them as possible domestic terrorists. That the political system is not the product advertised prior to elections..both political parties.
Did you notice many times last night at the State of the Union, when Obama was talking about the military and bringing them home, that many times all representatives from the branch of military stayed seated, and did NOT clap? I think it's very telling of the behind the scenes intelligence, that THEY do NOT agree with his roles as "command in chief."
Most Users Ever Online: 288
Currently Browsing this Page:
Guest Posters: 2
Newest Members:shekllavanesa, Davizeus, hong wei, Lana, JOE SLIGHT, Harley Munjo, Mann Spencer, Dreckz de Majid, Boadicea, hoangnganvy1993
Administrators: John Greenewald: 579, blackvault: 1776