Court: Obama appointments are unconstitutional | The Trump Administration & US Politics | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Court: Obama appointments are unconstitutional
January 25, 2013
5:02 pm
Avatar
blackvault
Admin
Forum Posts: 1776
Member Since:
August 26, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

"Associated Press" wrote: By SAM HANANEL

WASHINGTON (AP) -- A federal appeals court has ruled that President Barack Obama violated the Constitution when he bypassed the Senate to fill vacancies on a labor relations panel.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit says Obama did not have the power to make recess appointments earlier this year to the National Labor Relations Board.

Obama claims he acted properly because the Senate was away for the holidays. But the court says the Senate technically stayed in session when lawmakers gaveled in and out every few days for so-called "pro forma" sessions.

GOP lawmakers used the tactic specifically to prevent Obama from using his recess power to fill vacancies in an agency they claimed was too pro-union.

The Obama administration is expected to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court.

© 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/ ... 5-10-49-05

-----
John Greenewald, Jr.
The Black Vault Website Owner / Operator
http://www.theblackvault.com

January 29, 2013
2:07 am
Avatar
Kybasser
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 43
Member Since:
November 29, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

How can anyone be surprised he has broken the constitutional law he has sworn to uphold? After all, he had clearly broken his oath of office. One of the sacred duties of the President is to ensure the enforcement of all U.S. laws. However, this president has openly and defiantly ordered his agencies to ignore U.S. Law (the DOJ) and to side step the law when he could not get his own party to pass his legislation in his first two years of presidency... mostly the EPA, but others as well.

Clinton was impeached for much less. However, it is my belief, if he had not been re-elected, there would have been riots in the streets, and even he feared that as evidenced by his statements prior to the election calling on "Calm" from all his supporters, and saying that violence would not be the answer to disappointments.

At least that last part was the right thing to do!!

Danny

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
73 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10232

bionic: 9870

at1with0: 9243

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 24017

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8696

Posts: 123382

Newest Members:

Joanna, Melanie, chetney sessoms, Horatius, Express Documents, PaulDee094, Gary Wayne Ponder, AuthenticDocuments, matic mogan, nativembonyesiwe

Administrators: John Greenewald: 570, blackvault: 1776