Proofs of God | Religion Spirituality | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Proofs of God
December 26, 2011
7:01 pm
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9243
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

http://bahai-library.com/pdf/2011_08/ha ... of_god.pdf

Starting on page 30

and on wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W.....S._Hatcher

Written in first order logic, Hatcher's proof of God is based on three axioms that he calls "empirically grounded" and an apriori assumption that "something exists."

The axioms are that:

P1. The principle of sufficient reason: All phenomena are either self-caused (i.e. A->A) or other-caused (B->A; B is not equal to A) but not both. Put another way, this principle says that the question "why?" is always meaningful. Everything happens for a reason.

P2. The potency principle: If A -> B then for all C element of B, A -> C. In other words if A is the cause of B then A is the cause of every part of B. There are several notions of causality in philosophy. Hatcher's notion of causality is total causality; i.e. it is not the straw that breaks the camel's back but the 1000 straws before it, the camel, gravity, and so forth, that give rise to the camel breaking its back.

P3. The principle of limitation: For all A, where A is an element of B, B -> A does not hold. This says a system (which Hatcher represents as a set) cannot be the cause of its own components. Hatcher justifies this by explaining any system has (1) form (the parts) and (2) function (the relationship between the parts). A car (the system) cannot be the cause of its own steering wheel (a part), because the car does not even logically exist until the steering wheel exists. Thus the car's existence cannot precede the steering wheel's existence.

Hatcher shows that the logical outcome of these 3 axioms together with the above noted assumption are the existence of a "unique, universal, uncaused cause."

[...]

"it is easy to grow crazy"

December 27, 2011
5:51 am
Avatar
frrostedman
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3815
Member Since:
September 4, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The existence of a Creator, as you stated very eloquently and successfully, is simply logical.

The only question that remains, using this logic, is do we know the Creator and if so, which proposed God is the true one?

Every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe-a spirit vastly superior to that of man. - Albert Einstein

December 27, 2011
11:28 am
Avatar
humphreys
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2149
Member Since:
August 21, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I think, unless you can prove this first uncaused cause is sentient, you have no more logical right to call it God than I do to call it nature, or as I like to explain it "the laws of physics that exist in a state of complete nothingness".

Also, atheistic scientists have proposed similar mechanisms which they certainly do not refer to as God, such as Quantum Fluctuations in vacuum, and something I read about which I forget the exact term for, but it's basically a formula which tries to prove inflation occurs constantly in a multiverse, spawning an infinite number of bubble Universes within the whole.

I doubt Christians will be happy if you turn their God into the laws of physics!

"All of our behavior can be traced to biological events about which we have no conscious knowledge: this has always suggested that free will is an illusion."

- Sam Harris

December 27, 2011
12:33 pm
Avatar
bionic
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9870
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

We are God..we are some kind of collective..of some sort..we..us and everyhting around us..we are connected..yet..seperate. I don't know how this works..but I know..in my heart..it's true..and there is some kind of heirarchy..yet..I do not know how it works

believe me or not..whatever

http://freespace.virgin.net/sarah.peter ... zyman.html

Willie Wonka quotes..
What is this Wonka, some kind of funhouse?
Why? Are you having fun?
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
We are the music makers, we are the dreamers of dreams

December 27, 2011
3:19 pm
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9243
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

We are God only inasmuch as a rock is God. The holographic principle and all.

Ever notice that in Star Wars, the holographic form of someone during a long-distance phone call is the same as the luminous being Obi-Wan has? I just thought that was a curious move on Lucas' part.

"it is easy to grow crazy"

December 27, 2011
6:02 pm
Avatar
greeney2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 10166
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

How do you know that when God created the Universe, God knew it had to include a specific law of physics to work properly? The basic forces in nature were created first?

December 27, 2011
6:10 pm
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9243
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I'm not sure if you're addressing me but I'm not convinced that the universe is a creation.

"it is easy to grow crazy"

December 27, 2011
7:03 pm
Avatar
greeney2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 10166
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Humphrey mentioned physics. I also do not think the world was created at least in the bible explanation of it. I think the bible leaves us with the question of what a day was to God. Most people see Genesis as Monday to Friday, and a 24 hours day as we know it, literally. I believe in the creation, to the point of thinking from a complete void and nothing, God created the heavens and earth. How God did it, the process, and most important the time it took, is the question. If it took billions of years and the forces of nature, that could have been only the first day for God.

How do you answer "In the beginning, there was nothing, and world was just a void"? How Nothing was turned into something, and what forces could there be if there was nothing. Or was there ever just nothing? There had to be a beginning! Is there an end point to the Universe, but what is just past the end point if any? Another void? What law of physics covers turning nothing into something, let alone a universe? Even Science can not answer that one. Physics and science can not provide all these answers, at least yet.

December 27, 2011
8:35 pm
Avatar
humphreys
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2149
Member Since:
August 21, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I would think that perhaps laws of physics as we know them apply to states of existence, and that when there is no existence, there are no laws as such, so anything can happen, including something coming from nothing.

If you think about it, laws are simply restrictions applied to material things. Remove the material things, and you remove the restrictions.

No Universe=no laws, which means it's pointless to even apply logic to such a state. That's where the kinda arguments being made in the opening post fall apart.

We see a Universe, and use the logic of that Universe to determine how it came to be, which misses the point that prior to the Universe, the logic we are using did not even necessarily apply.

The same problem arises when we ask what came before the big bang. Well, the big bang was also the creation of time according to mainstream science, so the question becomes meaningless. What came before the big bang is like asking what is outside the Universe.

"All of our behavior can be traced to biological events about which we have no conscious knowledge: this has always suggested that free will is an illusion."

- Sam Harris

December 28, 2011
12:59 am
Avatar
greeney2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 10166
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The 4 basic forces of nature cannot do a thing to "nothing or a complete void". Nothing means nothing, not a single atom, no matter whatsoever.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
31 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10166

bionic: 9870

at1with0: 9243

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 23672

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 32

Topics: 8550

Posts: 122758

Newest Members:

Jones splatch, 7155304653, iluty, Donald Mitchell, skippy mccracken, Henweielts, Athena, Athena, Athena, ocodevohu

Administrators: John Greenewald: 518, blackvault: 1777