who would you rather spend your tax dollars on? | Questions that make you think... | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
who would you rather spend your tax dollars on?
February 7, 2010
2:45 am
Avatar
Guest
Guests

A good friend asked me this one day,

If I were to take a gun and kill as many serial rapists and serious sex child offenders as I could,knowing full well they would repeat the offense,
but would have to spend the rest of my life in prison for it, OR if I could get as many convicted as possible through a huge drain on the tax system,and then tax payers pay for all of them to finish their life in prison..which one would you want to give the tax dollars too?

well..let me tell you it started quite the discussion.

One said how the hell are you gonna kill as many as you can, ambush the vatican? which I 'm not sure was quite fair, but..then another said thats a huge problem in the military as well...wanna here some good nam stories?

well..lets just say it started quite the debate as to where you would find these people....but almost all agreed they would rather pay for the guy who killed them ,then for the trial and prosecution , and living expenses of many, than for the one who killed them.

So I am posing the question to the members, and I would appreciate if you would answer the question I am posing as honestly as you can,without derailing it with other questions.

I know that might seem like high expectations..but if you could at least answer the question first,and explain why...then pose the questions it would be greatly appreciated.

February 7, 2010
6:39 am
Avatar
Wing-Zero
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3278
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Not one mortal deserves the right to choose whether someone else lives or dies.

War is an extension of economics and diplomacy through other means.

Economics and diplomacy are methods of securing resources used by humans.

Securing resources is the one necessary behavior for all living things.

War = Life

February 7, 2010
7:17 am
Avatar
greeney2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 10225
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

This isn't a question for anyone to answer except the author Sheye, becasue nobody else would think up such a stupid idea.

The question to you Sheye has nothing to do with tax dollars, or any of us, the question is "are you willing to do the killing, and spend the time"?

February 7, 2010
7:47 am
Avatar
Guest
Guests

This isn't a question for anyone to answer except the author Sheye, becasue nobody else would think up such a stupid idea.

The question to you Sheye has nothing to do with tax dollars, or any of us, the question is "are you willing to do the killing, and spend the time"?

Your'e so predictable greeney, cause I knew before you even posted what you were going to type.

And because you did EXACTLY as I predicted.....no...I will not answer your question....until you answer mine...HONESTLY!!!!!!

February 7, 2010
7:56 am
Avatar
greeney2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 10225
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I think calling it a stupid idea pretty much gives my answer.. Now its your turn.

By the way I sent you a PM a few hours ago.

February 7, 2010
8:10 am
Avatar
Guest
Guests

Not one mortal deserves the right to choose whether someone else lives or dies.

Thankyou for for proving me right again., about not answering the question posed.

I guess that would mean that the cop somewhere out who had to decide to shoot someone, before 4 innocent people got shot..should be tried with a jury for that offense?

Lets say it wasn't a cop..just a husband who came home to find someone had tied up all of his family, and was planning to kill them all, but luckily he forgot the keys to his office and came home just in time....and there wasn't really any time to call the cops, cause it was going down all way too fast for that?

February 7, 2010
8:36 am
Avatar
greeney2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 10225
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Moderator message:

Sheye, you asked a specific question and Wing and I both gave you an answer. Now you are posing 2 different unrelated questions.

Keep this post on the same question you first asked, you are free to make new posts with the other questions.

Sheye you need to goto your private messages, I have sent you a PM you need to read.

February 7, 2010
12:14 pm
Avatar
Guest
Guests

Sheye, you asked a specific question and Wing and I both gave you an answer. Now you are posing 2 different unrelated questions.

Keep this post on the same question you first asked, you are free to make new posts with the other questions.

Sheye you need to goto your private messages, I have sent you a PM you need to read.

Reply removed by moderator for review

February 9, 2010
7:22 am
Avatar
Wing-Zero
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3278
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thankyou for for proving me right again., about not answering the question posed.

If you refuse to see my answer that's your problem, not mine.

I guess that would mean that the cop somewhere out who had to decide to shoot someone, before 4 innocent people got shot..should be tried with a jury for that offense?

No, but he still didn't have the right to take a life, just like the shooter doesn't have the right either. The law is there to try those who do it out of maliciousness, not self-defense.

Lets say it wasn't a cop..just a husband who came home to find someone had tied up all of his family, and was planning to kill them all, but luckily he forgot the keys to his office and came home just in time....and there wasn't really any time to call the cops, cause it was going down all way too fast for that?

See above.

War is an extension of economics and diplomacy through other means.

Economics and diplomacy are methods of securing resources used by humans.

Securing resources is the one necessary behavior for all living things.

War = Life

February 9, 2010
11:23 pm
Avatar
Guest
Guests

Quote:
I guess that would mean that the cop somewhere out who had to decide to shoot someone, before 4 innocent people got shot..should be tried with a jury for that offense?

No, but he still didn't have the right to take a life, just like the shooter doesn't have the right either. The law is there to try those who do it out of maliciousness, not self-defense.

I understand your view point wing ,zero

but how can a soul be expected to bring a jury of his or her peers, to decide what is correct when they must take an action quicky ,or consequences that will effect others will take place?

No permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
42 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10225

bionic: 9870

at1with0: 9243

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 23910

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8653

Posts: 123258

Newest Members:

laundryroom, kesan, Paul Thomas, Tony Lowe, ieltstips11, kath, Mike Maccini, The Royal Dissident, nan, KRISTIE Perkins

Administrators: John Greenewald: 557, blackvault: 1776