What is truth? | Page 3 | Questions that make you think... | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
What is truth?
April 2, 2012
12:00 pm
Avatar
DIss0n80r
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4161
Member Since:
April 20, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
575sp_Permalink sp_Print

"at1with0" wrote: I don't know if this answers your questions but numbers still exist (or don't exist) regardless of whether or not there are things to count.

How do you differentiate between things to count and numbers?

"I can conceive of nothing in religion, science, or philosophy, that is anything more than the proper thing to wear, for a while." ~ Charles Fort

April 2, 2012
7:10 pm
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9243
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
576sp_Permalink sp_Print

"khanster" wrote: [quote="at1with0"]I don't know if this answers your questions but numbers still exist (or don't exist) regardless of whether or not there are things to count.

If there are things to count then numbers must exist.

Any discernible difference between "things" is a number.

There are different concepts (e.g., triangles and circles) therefore numbers exist. hehe
Reality exists implies that the number 1 exists for in that scenario, at least one thing exists.

Then 2 exists because "reality exists" and ""reality exists" is true" are two true statements.

Similarly, all natural numbers exist.

It takes some effort but all numbers can be defined in terms of natural numbers.

However, to say that there is a SET of all natural numbers can not be proved it must be assumed (axiom of infinity).

"DIss0n80r" wrote: [quote="at1with0"]I don't know if this answers your questions but numbers still exist (or don't exist) regardless of whether or not there are things to count.

How do you differentiate between things to count and numbers?

It would seem to be better that we reduce the number of undefined primitive notions to a minimum; therefore, let's stick with sets being that one undefined notion.

Natural numbers are defined (Or can be defined) in terms of sets
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_nu ... set_theory
In this way, natural numbers are viewed as specific sets.

To answer your question, not all things are sets but numbers, in this line of thought, are sets thus things to count and numbers are entirely different categories of real.

"it is easy to grow crazy"

April 3, 2012
7:11 am
Avatar
khanster
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 710
Member Since:
September 19, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
577sp_Permalink sp_Print

"at1with0" wrote:

There are different concepts (e.g., triangles and circles) therefore numbers exist. hehe
Reality exists implies that the number 1 exists for in that scenario, at least one thing exists.

Then 2 exists because "reality exists" and ""reality exists" is true" are two true statements.

Similarly, all natural numbers exist.

It takes some effort but all numbers can be defined in terms of natural numbers.

However, to say that there is a SET of all natural numbers can not be proved it must be assumed (axiom of infinity).

:clap: :clap: :clap:

http://arxiv.org/pdf/0709.4024v1.pdf

So here is the crux of my argument. If you believe
in an external reality independent of humans, then you
must also believe in what I call the mathematical universe
hypothesis: that our physical reality is a mathematical
structure. In other words, we all live in a gigantic
mathematical object— one that is more elaborate than a
dodecahedron, and probably also more complex than objects
with intimidating names like Calabi-Yau manifolds,
tensor bundles and Hilbert spaces, which appear in today’s
most advanced theories. Everything in our world
is purely mathematical — including you.

April 3, 2012
7:46 am
Avatar
DIss0n80r
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4161
Member Since:
April 20, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
578sp_Permalink sp_Print

What does it mean for you to be a mathematical object?

"I can conceive of nothing in religion, science, or philosophy, that is anything more than the proper thing to wear, for a while." ~ Charles Fort

April 3, 2012
8:31 am
Avatar
khanster
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 710
Member Since:
September 19, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
579sp_Permalink sp_Print

"DIss0n80r" wrote: What does it mean for you to be a mathematical object?

[Image Can Not Be Found]

April 3, 2012
12:04 pm
Avatar
DIss0n80r
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4161
Member Since:
April 20, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
580sp_Permalink sp_Print

Elaborate.

"I can conceive of nothing in religion, science, or philosophy, that is anything more than the proper thing to wear, for a while." ~ Charles Fort

April 3, 2012
4:58 pm
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9243
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
581sp_Permalink sp_Print

The path of a projectile is a mathematical object.

[Image Can Not Be Found]

Of course, the mathematical objects isomorphic to US are far more complex.

"it is easy to grow crazy"

April 7, 2012
8:25 am
Avatar
khanster
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 710
Member Since:
September 19, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
582sp_Permalink sp_Print

As a simplistic analogy, say we have a perception of self = 1 dimension

a perception of perspective of other than self = 2nd dimension

a perception of duration which gives depth, which some might call "time" = 3rd dimension

A two dimensional holographic encoding plus time gives three dimensions.

Long live the Droids :clap:

April 7, 2012
3:33 pm
Avatar
DIss0n80r
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4161
Member Since:
April 20, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
583sp_Permalink sp_Print

They arise together.

"I can conceive of nothing in religion, science, or philosophy, that is anything more than the proper thing to wear, for a while." ~ Charles Fort

April 7, 2012
8:12 pm
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9243
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
584sp_Permalink sp_Print

Perhaps it would help to view dimensions as degrees of freedom.

"it is easy to grow crazy"

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
71 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10245

bionic: 9870

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Tairaa: 2842

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 24222

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8750

Posts: 123584

Newest Members:

[email protected], Aaron Breuer, Kjel, Kyle, White Buffalo, Swampfox61, Leo jensen, clive twist, John Smith

Administrators: John Greenewald: 592, blackvault: 1776