It does seem like preparation indeed.

I have this idea of God that I'm trying to secretly translate into something mathematical, where I just define it and show it exists though far be it for me to divulge its nature. It may be impossible but I must find out. Of course in my article I never mention God or divulge what I'm really trying to do. Cantor, the father of modern set theory, tried to do the same with his universal (all-inclusive) set but Russell came along and proved there can't be a universal set in Cantorian set theory which devastated him. Cantor, the one who mathematized infinity, spent the rest of his days in an asylum. It seems that sometimes, once infinity gets in your mind, it stays there and can make you a little batshit crazy.

The problem of defining God has vexed me for many a year now. The definition I've been using of late, and it's a work in progress, is the totality of all that exists. If something which exists (whether its true nature is matrix/hologram/dream/illusion/concrete/etc) is a tree, then God is the forest.

math is connected to reality, music is connected to math. reality is music.

Did you know there is a square circle?

In a grid like a streetmap of downtown, they call it the taxicab metric. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T.....cab_metric Distance is measure in how many edges it takes to get from point A to point B.

Well a circle is the set of all points equidistant to the center.

In a taxi land, a circle is a square.

Indeed. Can't forget them.

I'm just chalk full of useless facts like a circle can be a square