48÷2(9+3) = ? | Questions that make you think... | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
Guest

Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
48÷2(9+3) = ?
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9242
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
June 12, 2012 - 3:30 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Many people will get 2.

Subtraction is the same as adding the additive inverse (the opposite) and division is the same thing as multiplying by the multiplicative inverse (the reciprocal).

Therefore, 48/2(9+3) is 48*.5*(9+3) which is 24*12 = 288. (.5 is the reciprocal of 2)

When using the PEMDAS convention, M and D are done simultaneously left to right because multiplication is commutative and since D is really M by the reciprocal. When using the PEMDAS convention, A and S are done simultaneously left to right because addition is commutative and since S is really A of the opposite.

Every expression can be re-written to not use division and to not use subtraction. You'll have multiplication by the reciprocal and adding the opposite. When doing that, PEMDAS simplifies to PEMA.

"it is easy to grow crazy"

Avatar
Nesaie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1332
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
104870
June 13, 2012 - 9:18 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

You math geek! 😛

So maybe, as above so below? Or maybe we can exclude below or above? I'm sure you're one of the few people who could get these questions.

Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen... - Zbigniew Brezhinsky

Avatar
gumrosin
New Member
Members
Forum Posts: 0
Member Since:
June 8, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
104943
June 15, 2012 - 3:28 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

288

Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9242
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
104966
June 15, 2012 - 10:12 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

your signature is whack

"it is easy to grow crazy"

Avatar
SmokinJoe
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 360
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
105597
June 28, 2012 - 4:32 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

"at1with0" wrote: Many people will get 2.

Therefore, 48/2(9+3) is 48*.5*(9+3) which is 24*12 = 288. (.5 is the reciprocal of 2)

Every expression can be re-written to not use division and to not use subtraction

That is amazing. In school, you are taught to first work the right side of the problem (9+3). Then move left..so it looks like this:
(9+3) is 12...
2(12)
24
48/24
2

But he actually starts with 2 being the critical link between both equations.

48/2 (or 48*.5)
24
then he goes to the right side..

(9+3)
12

bringing it home...
24 x 12 = 288.

It is the exact same equation with 2 outcomes depending on one's interpretation of it. That is a great metaphor in life. Also, if you aren't open to other interpretations, you just won't see it.

AWESOME video, at1... :thumbup:

Dawkins thinks belief in God is an excuse to evade thinking in the scientific world. Sadly, he is ignorant to the list of christian scientists who have contributed & founded many of the sciences he himself believes in. How ironic.

Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9242
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
105600
June 28, 2012 - 4:47 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The result is 100% dependent on what convention you use.

"it is easy to grow crazy"

Avatar
SmokinJoe
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 360
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
105602
June 28, 2012 - 5:09 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

"at1with0" wrote: The result is 100% dependent on what convention you use.

LOL..yup!

Dawkins thinks belief in God is an excuse to evade thinking in the scientific world. Sadly, he is ignorant to the list of christian scientists who have contributed & founded many of the sciences he himself believes in. How ironic.

Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9242
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
105616
June 28, 2012 - 6:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Apparently, this discussion (whether it "is" 2 or 288 or something else) rages on in the interwebs. A ring theorist studies generalizations of the integers (which form the prototypical example of a ring) all day long but that in itself doesn't make him an authority on integers because arithmetic is pretty far removed from what they do in day-to-day work. They think about pretty strange, abstract stuff far removed from actual numbers.

"it is easy to grow crazy"

Avatar
bionic
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9877
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
105989
July 5, 2012 - 9:02 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I get 24..
there's another answer?

Willie Wonka quotes..
What is this Wonka, some kind of funhouse?
Why? Are you having fun?
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
We are the music makers, we are the dreamers of dreams

Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9242
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
106018
July 5, 2012 - 2:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

"it is easy to grow crazy"

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
22 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
2 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10043

bionic: 9877

at1with0: 9242

Lashmar: 5757

tigger: 4576

rath: 4332

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3282

Newest Members:

Lucy Orellana

Maryjo Golder

Carmen Hooley

Tanesha Tarleton

Richard Raphael

Hamish Lininger

BrettMaitoGR

CharlesgopayLL

Alina Bagrova

Wallace Borelli

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8152

Posts: 121423

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 19370

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Administrators: John Greenewald, blackvault