Something to Think About Concerning Modern Medicine. Rev 2.0 | Health & Health Hazards | Forum


Please consider registering

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

— Match —

— Forum Options —

Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Something to Think About Concerning Modern Medicine. Rev 2.0
August 17, 2016
12:49 pm
Forum Posts: 147
Member Since:
January 28, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

There can never be any serious health reform until Orthomolecular medicine is accepted as a mainstream way of managing the healthcare of Americans. Many of the critics of Orthomolecular medicine say this form of therapeutic nutrition is based on anecdotal cases. Just like the late Abram Hoffer PhD, MD has stated numerous times “there is no evidence that anecdotal information is any less accurate then clinical information.”

These same critics of Orthomolecular medicine always fail to acknowledge that The Office of Technology Assessment of the United States Congress estimated that fewer than 30% of the procedures currently used in conventional medicine have been rigorously tested. Karen Koffler MD an internal-medicine specialist is quoted as saying “the notion that everything allopathic medicine does is backed up by evidence is nonsense. We put patients on Heparin, a blood thinning medication, after a heart attack. No one, as far as I’ve found, has rigorously tested that, and we’ve been doing it forever.”

Anecdotal evidence is a basically uncontrolled clinical observation which provides a reason why a certain treatment protocol is successful or not. These uncontrolled clinical observations provide the impetus for the gathering of clinical data, and if done correctly will provide a scientific explanation why or why not a particular treatment is effective.

The vast majority of diseases should be managed in more affordable ways, based on Orthomolecular medicine which relies on optidoses (optimal doses) of vitamins which enhances the human body’s natural capacity for healing and uses inexpensive, low tech methods to manage most common diseases. The $65,000 question is why don’t the insurance companies endorse orthomolecular medicine as a means to lower healthcare spending? Just like Andrew Saul PhD has said many times “good health makes a lot of sense but it does not make a lot of dollars.”  

August 18, 2016
12:56 pm
Forum Posts: 186
Member Since:
November 17, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

That's right.  It is always about money not health.  In the USA alternative medical is suppressed.  Insurance companies will not pay for it and states will not licence it.  As a result the cost of medical treatment is three times as expensive as in the next highest cost country. That is up from twice as expensive in the 1990s.  And we do not get anything for the extra cost. Life expectancy is lower than in other countries. Waiting time is greater.  Complications and side effects are more common.  Wonder drugs have become ineffective requiring the development of new and more expensive treatments.   There are treatments for diseases that many doubt even exist.  In other countries people say they feel better and are generally more happy with the treatment they get.  In addition that high cost is just for the medical treatment.  It does not include the 20% that the private insurance companies take off the top. 

When you can go out and see the universe, who wants to go look at a Russian submarine? (Melvin C. Riley, US Army Remote Viewer)

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
63 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10239

bionic: 9870

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Tairaa: 2842

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 24137

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8730

Posts: 123496

Newest Members:

Von wahlde, lyon smith, Andrew Witmark, Charlie, JeffreyHollister, lora beth, DEFENCE SECTOR, Inger Kercado, kanye, Patriotic American

Administrators: John Greenewald: 585, blackvault: 1776