Romney's Lust for WW3 | Government and Political Conspiracies | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Romney's Lust for WW3
October 28, 2012
7:26 pm
Avatar
sharklive6
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
October 26, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The reason why Romney has most likely lost this election is because he openly admits that he would be "delighted" to attack Iran and according the recent reports Mittens is another Bush.

Remember Bush left office with a 22% approval rating and if Mittens thinks being another Bush is going to be good politically he is wrong.

Obama is handling the Isreal/Libya situation responsibly and finding a peaceful solution.

For you Republicans who lack education let me explain what bombing Iran will do if Mittens gets power.

1. China and Russia would not be happy
a) China could decide to stop exporting and cause the economy to crash even worse than it did during Bush.

b) Russia has interests in Iran because they are doing arms deals with them. Russia has already confirmed that it would cause problems.

Maybe that is why Romney thinks Russia is America's #1 enemy

Also:
Mitten's budget plan will add 7 trillion to our debt and he does not include his new cost of his war that he is droolling about.

Think about it folks.

October 28, 2012
8:35 pm
Avatar
BloodStone
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1401
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Russia is still a very viable threat to this Country.

BloodStone...

If it were raining hookers, I'd get hit by a fag.

October 29, 2012
11:59 pm
Avatar
rath
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4297
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

"BloodStone" wrote: Russia is still a very viable threat to this Country. BloodStone...

So is poverty.

October 31, 2012
11:53 pm
Avatar
BloodStone
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1401
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

yeah ? so ?

still doesnt mean Russia isnt a very viable threat to the USA, just ask Obamao after the election he'll have more flexability , thankfully for us Romney will win by a nice margin. So we wont have to worry about the poverty part. But what do u care Australia will be fine ....lol

BloodStone...

If it were raining hookers, I'd get hit by a fag.

November 1, 2012
8:53 pm
Avatar
capricorn
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 722
Member Since:
July 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

"sharklive6" wrote: China could decide to stop exporting and cause the economy to crash even worse than it did during Bush.

Ha, China is addicted to the US economy like crack rock. They need us and they don't want the US economy to collapse.

"a free society depends on a virtuous and moral people."

November 2, 2012
4:12 pm
Avatar
Cole_Trickle
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2730
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

b) Russia has interests in Iran because they are doing arms deals with them. Russia has already confirmed that it would cause problems.

Maybe that is why Romney thinks Russia is America's #1 enemy

The above is false info:

Russia is currently selling massive amounts of weaponry to Iraq---not Iran

Romney is in fact a Russian apologists---agent----IF YOU WILL.

This was recently exposed through the back channel, and as a matter of FACT
ABC has had this story for 18 months and thus far has refused to run it.

So it just got leaked this week..... I posted about it on another thread.

Romney's Bain Capital-------is the key. 😉

Cole

November 3, 2012
7:24 pm
Avatar
BloodStone
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1401
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

what it all comes down to again is the ECONOMY .

Thats what people are voting for this election, and Obamao has failed miserably.

BloodStone...

If it were raining hookers, I'd get hit by a fag.

November 7, 2012
11:58 am
Avatar
Nesaie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1452
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

What happened to 'obummer' Bloodstone? 😉 I got that one from you and it still makes people laugh.

Obummer got re-(s)elected due to...free phones...ignorance...more GMO food stamps/EBT cards...war (I guess we like wars)...etc...

My guy never wins. This time I voted for Gary Johnson.

Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen... - Zbigniew Brezhinsky

November 7, 2012
5:42 pm
Avatar
BloodStone
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1401
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Sad day indeed Nesaie

I was just writing the same thing on another thread. We have indeed lost the war already. Now it is know to all that the illegals , and freeloaders have banded together to keep getting what they want for nothing. This Country will never be the same, we have lost the war, and it didnt even need to have shots fired.

We had a good run, Good bye America you will be missed.

Nice seein ya round Nesaie, hope all is well

BloodStone...

If it were raining hookers, I'd get hit by a fag.

November 7, 2012
8:52 pm
Avatar
greeney2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 10245
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I totally disagree we are not finished Bloodstone. Nesaie I would have pegged you as a Rosanne Barr/ Cindy Sheehan voter, who got 36,914 votes in California believe it or not.

I disagree with you because Obama did not regain control of the Congress, and we do have these checks and balances, one of them being the staggered terms in the Senate and House, that evolves at intervals staggering the Presidential terms. Obama felt the sting of loosing the House 2 years ago, and the voters sent him the same message in the House, plus the Dems do not have the super majority of the Senate, they only have a slight majority. So all is not lost, and Obama will be forced to move towards the moderate middle, if he wants to get anything done.

The President is not the Lone Ranger, President has to work in Conjunction with the Congress which gives all the states and people a systematic input to what and how the President has to preform. He has already shown he needs to reach out to them and work out differences. If he refuses to do that not much will change.

I think what we have seen since 2000 is the stark comparison between the right wing Bush conservative era, and the Left wing liberal era. The stark difference between the opinions of many social issues, military issues, concepts of government programs, with the economy stuck in the middle. Clinton had to move to the moderate side of compromise and work with a mixed congress, Obama will have to do the same thing. If he has any chance of throwing off the idea he is the worst President since Carter, he has to do this.

Seems very odd that if the Democrats won, they would not have voted to gain back seats in the house, but they didn't. What does that tell us? Seems very strange ROmney/Ryan lost, however Ryan got reelected as Senator in his state, which they lost for President.

No permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
75 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10245

bionic: 9870

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Tairaa: 2842

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 24238

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8760

Posts: 123599

Newest Members:

johngava, hkusptac, Paul-Revere, Shannon, Jeff, Alex Parrish, Sharp, Mikey Ites, Ananth, mexican narco

Administrators: John Greenewald: 593, blackvault: 1776