Cruise Missle Hits Pentagon CLASSIFIED interesting | Page 2 | Government and Political Conspiracies | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Cruise Missle Hits Pentagon CLASSIFIED interesting
September 19, 2011
9:29 pm
Avatar
greeney2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 10262
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Ridiculas! The Globalhawk in 2001 only a few were made, and they were survalance unmanned aircraft, they were not bombers whatsoever. They flew, did survalance, and returned, they were spyplanes. They were small, lightweight, grossly overbudget, and only had a 2000 pound payload capacity, for survance like the U2 spyplane. The frame was lightweight aluminum with graphite wings, it is not a cruise missile which is a bombing system that homes in on a precise target with programed imaging or GPS. It flew at very high altitudes, for very long distances, where cruise missiles can fly close to the ground, homing in on targets.

No cigar on this one, its not even a close possiblity. No way did it have the tonage, nor payload capacity, to drive through an entire outer ring of the pentagon. Not to mention not a single theory of where it could have come from, been unexplained missing, and that the airliner just happens to maybe be shot down in the ocean. Bodies were IDed and buried from remains at the Pentagon, including those on the airliner. Do you see how preposterous these theories are when you put common sence to it? It doesn't make sence!

September 19, 2011
10:29 pm
Avatar
zoltan2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 512
Member Since:
September 2, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

"greeney2" wrote: Ridiculas! The Globalhawk in 2001 only a few were made, and they were survalance unmanned aircraft, they were not bombers whatsoever. They flew, did survalance, and returned, they were spyplanes. They were small, lightweight, grossly overbudget, and only had a 2000 pound payload capacity, for survance like the U2 spyplane. The frame was lightweight aluminum with graphite wings, it is not a cruise missile which is a bombing system that homes in on a precise target with programed imaging or GPS. It flew at very high altitudes, for very long distances, where cruise missiles can fly close to the ground, homing in on targets.

No cigar on this one, its not even a close possiblity. No way did it have the tonage, nor payload capacity, to drive through an entire outer ring of the pentagon. Not to mention not a single theory of where it could have come from, been unexplained missing, and that the airliner just happens to maybe be shot down in the ocean. Bodies were IDed and buried from remains at the Pentagon, including those on the airliner. Do you see how preposterous these theories are when you put common sence to it? It doesn't make sence!

The entry hole was 8 feet 3 inches in diameter and that is a fact. How says that a Golobalhawk could of not been teleguided with a bomb inside
Look at the pictures on this link and scroll down the link to see the pictures
The first picture show the hole while the immediate upper floor and windows are still intact. Where is there any debris of a jumbo jet in front of the building.
And do you honestly think that a 125 wing span and 100 tons of jumbo jet when into such a small hole of 8 feet and 3 inches in diameter while there is no visible wreckage.
Impossible

http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspirac ... -11-a.html

September 19, 2011
10:38 pm
Avatar
zoltan2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 512
Member Since:
September 2, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Scoll to the pictures on the next link
Flight 93 never crashed in the empty field outside Shanksville, Pennsylvania on 9/11 or any other day.

An article detailing Flight 93's last minutes was briefly available at dailynews.yahoo.com on 9/11/2001.
It [does] not fit the official story of the last moments of Flight 93 and rapidly disappeared from news websites, but it can still be found at the web archive: It was reported that a missile was heard before the crash:
Debris fell from Flight 93 nearly six miles from the crash scene . . . human remains were found miles from the crash scene . . . light debris was found eight miles from the crash scene . . . and the following footage proves Flight 93 did not crash in a single piece but came apart in midair and scattered over a wide area . . .

Must see rare footage = <...NBC News Report.

The military refused to rule out a shoot down on September 15, 2001... ...and the Washington Envoy to Canada says Bush ordered a shoot down . . . What else is the government concealing about 9/11?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspirac ... ville.html

September 20, 2011
11:21 pm
Avatar
zoltan2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 512
Member Since:
September 2, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Greeney2

Waiting for an answer have you seen debris of a 100 ton jumbo jet in the pictures
Waiting for an answer have you seen debris of a 100 jumbo jet crashed at Shanksville Pennsylvania
Have you listen to the news team that were immediately there.

This ain't no trash I hope you have to balls to reply

September 21, 2011
8:37 am
Avatar
greeney2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 10262
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I answered already!

September 21, 2011
12:39 pm
Avatar
zoltan2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 512
Member Since:
September 2, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

"greeney2" wrote: I answered already!

Yeah right . Why am I not surprise.

Just like even horizon you just don't answer directly.

Still Waiting for an answer have you seen debris of a 100 ton jumbo jet in the pictures taken moments from the pentagon
http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspirac ... -11-a.html
Still Waiting for an answer have you seen debris of a 100 jumbo jet crashed at Shanksville Pennsylvania
Did you listen to the news team that were immediately there.

Evidence
http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspirac ... -11-a.html

FLIGHT 93 CRASH EXPOSED! RARE FOOTAGE NEVER AGAIN SEEN ON TV
Do you see a jumbo jet boeing of 100 tons Greeney at Shanksville Pennsylvania
Evidence
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJOlwcJ6 ... re=related

September 23, 2011
2:40 am
Avatar
zoltan2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 512
Member Since:
September 2, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Only one engine was found inside the Pentagon. The two images below show two parts of the single engine found in the Pentagon. The left-hand image shows what appears to be part of the rotor element bearing the stubs of vanes. The right-hand image shows what appears to be the compressor (front) stage of the engine encased by its housing. This engine is barely a third the diameter of a large turbofan engine that powers the Boeing 757.

Engines found at the pentagon not from a Boeing 757

http://911review.com/errors/pe.....engine.jpg

http://911review.com/errors/pe.....engine.jpg

Real Boeing engine of a 757
http://911review.com/errors/pe.....pw2000.jpg

September 23, 2011
3:39 am
Avatar
capricorn
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 722
Member Since:
July 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

There are so many good reasons to doubt the official story the US government has given. Every point that Zoltan2 makes might not be the correct answer to the problem; however, he does a good job pointing out that there is in fact a problem. And it is not just he and others in this forum that would support an investigation into the 911 account, there are politicians , civilian groups and professionals who worked for the Bush administration that would too.

There is plenty of video that would quickly end the debate whether a plane hit the pentagon or not. However, the government has chosen to classify all of it except for 10 frames of video. And those 10 frames show nothing at all conclusive to suggest a plane hit the pentagon. To me, it is obvious they are hiding the rest of the evidence because they have something to hide.

"a free society depends on a virtuous and moral people."

September 23, 2011
1:43 pm
Avatar
zoltan2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 512
Member Since:
September 2, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

"capricorn" wrote: There are so many good reasons to doubt the official story the US government has given. Every point that Zoltan2 makes might not be the correct answer to the problem; however, he does a good job pointing out that there is in fact a problem. And it is not just he and others in this forum that would support an investigation into the 911 account, there are politicians , civilian groups and professionals who worked for the Bush administration that would too.

There is plenty of video that would quickly end the debate whether a plane hit the pentagon or not. However, the government has chosen to classify all of it except for 10 frames of video. And those 10 frames show nothing at all conclusive to suggest a plane hit the pentagon. To me, it is obvious they are hiding the rest of the evidence because they have something to hide.

That is my point. And it is not Anti American to find out the truth about raised questions.
If greeney son would of died in one of the World Trade Center or at the Pentagon he sure would react differently
Look at this picture taken minutes when the pentagon was hit.
You see the paramedics the army and the side of the pentagon still standing very well.
No debris at all of a 100 ton 757 jumbo jet.

http://media.hamptonroads.com/cache/fil ... 705151.jpg

No permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
75 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10262

bionic: 9870

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Tairaa: 2842

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 24449

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8820

Posts: 123802

Newest Members:

QuietLiistener, Kemmer, Dee, ielts abono, Viviane Trevithick, Bill Rita, Snow, Warren

Administrators: John Greenewald: 616, blackvault: 1776