What if reality were really just 'Sim Universe'? | General Discussion Topics | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
What if reality were really just 'Sim Universe'?
December 17, 2012
4:29 pm
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9243
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2012/12/17/ ... -universe/

"We are looking for something to indicate you don't have a space-time continuum."

That disturbance in the force might be a hint that something in reality is amiss. If the cosmic ray energy levels travel along the grid, like following streets in Manhattan or Salt Lake City, it probably is unlikely to be a simulation; if they unexpectedly travel diagonally, reality may be a computer program.

Jim Kakalios, a physics professor at the University of Minnesota who was not involved in the paper, said a test such as the one Savage suggests may not prove anything. If they don't find the signatures, it doesn't mean we are not a simulation; our descendants could have used a different grid. If they do find something it also could mean “that's the way space-time is and we never noticed before,” he said.

"it is easy to grow crazy"

December 18, 2012
8:19 am
Avatar
En-Lugal
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 564
Member Since:
August 27, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

If it turns out to be true, when we become aware, will the creator(s) pull the plug in a panic? 😈

The modern definition of ‘racist’ is someone who’s winning an argument with a liberal.

December 18, 2012
8:31 am
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9243
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Personally, I don't see why a discrete space-time lattice (rather than a space-time continuum) proves this is a simulation.

What I'm wondering is if truth is radically different in their world. Maybe 1+1=Pi.

I've seen hypnotists tell people to forget the number 7 and then the hypnotized person will count 1 to 10 and actually omit 7.

Maybe they have us hypnotized and there are many numbers we have forgotten that they have in their world.

The laws of physics could be completely different in their world. Perhaps gravity repels instead of attracts and they wanted to imagine what happens when the reverse is true in a simulation.

"it is easy to grow crazy"

December 18, 2012
8:43 am
Avatar
En-Lugal
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 564
Member Since:
August 27, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

For all we know, we're experiment #2345698712 sharing a server blade with several other experiments. Maybe we're on a single harddrive in a long forgotten basement. All I know is this game sucks.

The modern definition of ‘racist’ is someone who’s winning an argument with a liberal.

December 18, 2012
8:58 am
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9243
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I made a program once where random strings of length 10 were generated.

Every string represented a true statement about a universe I created.

I did not invent a way to decipher the string of random letters and characters.

For example, 83jbri39f was an output which was code for a true statement. Who knows what it meant but for instance it could have meant that the object referenced by 83j has a relationship with an object named bri and the result is an object referenced by 39f.

"In 83 years, bri will get married." For example, is what that code could mean though I never tried to decipher it.

It was a lot like the green text popularized by the matrix except the green stuff wasn't what was false (ie the matrix), the green stuff is what is true.

"it is easy to grow crazy"

December 18, 2012
9:37 pm
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9243
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Here's a little universe I created Laugh

This is a simulation of reality.

"it is easy to grow crazy"

December 19, 2012
12:48 am
Avatar
DIss0n80r
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4161
Member Since:
April 20, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

:think:

"I can conceive of nothing in religion, science, or philosophy, that is anything more than the proper thing to wear, for a while." ~ Charles Fort

December 19, 2012
2:13 am
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9243
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Unless one has been living in a cave, they are familiar with how the matrix was represented outside the matrix by flowing green characters.

I decided that if we're in a simulation, then such a flow might represent a window to outside the simulation.

Metaphorically speaking, of course... 😀

"it is easy to grow crazy"

December 19, 2012
2:50 am
Avatar
DIss0n80r
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4161
Member Since:
April 20, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

"I can conceive of nothing in religion, science, or philosophy, that is anything more than the proper thing to wear, for a while." ~ Charles Fort

December 19, 2012
3:15 am
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9243
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thank you for that, Diss.

I'm part way through it and noticed this:

So, the Buddha did not transcend the world, he experienced it fully and deeply. Really, it is the opposite of overcoming it. It could be said that we are overcoming the world in our conventional daily experience of distracting ourselves with story-lines filled with the self-frustrating hope and fear of wishing things were different than they actually are. That is the description of someone who overcomes her world by creating an artificial conceptual padding around herself so as not to have deal with the realities of life and existence.

Could it be said that the Buddha, while not overcoming the world, overcame "the illusion?"

There are two levels of enlightenment in Buddhism. The first, the Hinayana (smaller view) has as its goal the realization of selflessness, or the absence of the ego. The basis for this school is that there exists no entity that could be identified as the “self”. What we conventionally refer to as “I” is really a compounded formation of reducible parts. There is no single thing that exists that can be identified as a self. Each part can be broken down further and further ad infinitum. The second school, the Mahayana (larger view) holds the position that not just the self, but everything in the entire universe has as its basis this quality of emptiness (that is, emptiness of an independent existence).

With the help of the folks at LU, this finally makes sense.

I hafta run some errands, to be continued...

"it is easy to grow crazy"

No permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online: Jason Kupzyk
41 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10201

bionic: 9870

at1with0: 9243

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 23826

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8617

Posts: 123011

Newest Members:

toni pen, sumangala_qpt, Jason Kupzyk, mark myers, ESDIndia, Jeremy Martin, PoorTree, Beechy, Film, melisablaise

Administrators: John Greenewald: 538, blackvault: 1776