The latest mass shooting and Liberals. | General Discussion Topics | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
The latest mass shooting and Liberals.
December 16, 2012
4:47 pm
Avatar
En-Lugal
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 564
Member Since:
August 27, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Let me paint a picture: Escape from New York, Escape from L.A. and Demolition Man. These are the Liberal blueprint for America. I am so sick of these people politicizing tragedies like this to grab guns. The Constitution doesn't say we can have guns for hunting as Liberals would have you believe. The Constitution allows us to have guns to prevent tyranny. They have tanks, planes, and rockets so we are at a disadvantage already. I don't necessarily agree with assault weapon bans but I wouldn't say it's ok to carry them around either, obviously.

Ownership should be allowed, in every state. Besides, we've seen the results of states banning all guns. Bloomberg was just on television spouting some garbage about New York having the lowest crime rate in the country. Laugh Yes, really.

The modern definition of ‘racist’ is someone who’s winning an argument with a liberal.

December 16, 2012
11:27 pm
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9243
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Why wouldn't it be okay to carry around assault guns?

Are the guns afforded to us by the 2nd amendment only meant for us to pad our gun collections?

"it is easy to grow crazy"

December 17, 2012
12:40 am
Avatar
capricorn
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 722
Member Since:
July 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It depends, if there is a reason to walk around with them then yes. But at this moment, I don't think it is necessary. However, if the govt decides to roll down the street in army tanks and soldiers and start genocide then I may want to walk around with my assult rifle.
But if or when that happens, I'll be happy that my founding fathers gave me my sacred right to defend myself.

"a free society depends on a virtuous and moral people."

December 17, 2012
12:50 am
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9243
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It depends... so the 2nd amendment is a conditional provision?

"it is easy to grow crazy"

December 17, 2012
1:40 am
Avatar
capricorn
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 722
Member Since:
July 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The 2nd ammendment is not conditional, however every person has the obligation to exercise their right in a manner that respects the life, liberty and pursuit of happiness of another. When I say "it depends", I mean this from the individual moral perspective rather than from the law of physics perspective.

The problem is that we now live in a society of moral rejects. Some would like we as a people to eliminate this right since they feel we are no longer capable of taking care of ourselves. Some think that the govt would do a better job of running our lives if we as a people were to give up one of our unalienable rights. However, I disagree. I feel that once you make a something illegal, u take it away from the moral and upstanding citizens and put it in the hands of the criminals.

"a free society depends on a virtuous and moral people."

December 17, 2012
7:28 am
Avatar
En-Lugal
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 564
Member Since:
August 27, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

"at1with0" wrote: It depends... so the 2nd amendment is a conditional provision?

No, the Liberals want everyone to think it is. They create the notion that the 2nd Amendment refers to hunting rifles with five shot clips and handguns. When they argue it's because Americans don't need more than a five round clip for hunting. However, the second Amendment doesn't say only for hunting. Liberals know this but choose to be knowingly deceitful anyway.

The lady who was on Face to Face on CBS this morning, her name escapes me at the moment, said she would have a bill passed by the first of the year banning all guns in America. The only way I see that happening is if Liberals circumvent Congress and the Constitution. Seeing as how liberals have made a habit of this, it just might happen. I guess we'll see.

"at1with0" wrote: Why wouldn't it be okay to carry around assault guns?

Are the guns afforded to us by the 2nd amendment only meant for us to pad our gun collections?

"capricorn" wrote: The 2nd ammendment is not conditional, however every person has the obligation to exercise their right in a manner that respects the life, liberty and pursuit of happiness of another. When I say "it depends", I mean this from the individual moral perspective rather than from the law of physics perspective.

It's not that I object to assault weapons, I've owned them. I remember gun racks in the back window of people's vehicles. I have no problem with open carry, I've seen first hand that it works just fine in nearby Mississippi. I just never saw a need to carry an assault rifle, besides, those things are unwieldy. Laugh If it were decided by the people that it was alright, I'd be fine with it. Liberals are trying to ban ownership outright.

"capricorn" wrote: The problem is that we now live in a society of moral rejects. Some would like we as a people to eliminate this right since they feel we are no longer capable of taking care of ourselves. Some think that the govt would do a better job of running our lives if we as a people were to give up one of our unalienable rights. However, I disagree. I feel that once you make a something illegal, u take it away from the moral and upstanding citizens and put it in the hands of the criminals.

Right. The Liberals have been hand feeding the entitlement cases for generations and therefore gain the support of these same people now. The generations of enslaved and impoverished reality television subjects would gladly vote away their, and our, rights as long as their "free" check comes every month. That's why Obama's class warfare agenda resonates so well with these people. They've been indoctrinated to hate success and successful people. "It isn't fair" or "I want my fair share" they say.

The modern definition of ‘racist’ is someone who’s winning an argument with a liberal.

December 17, 2012
3:19 pm
Avatar
at1with0
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9243
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

"capricorn" wrote: The problem is that we now live in a society of moral rejects.

once you make a something illegal, u take it away from the moral and upstanding citizens and put it in the hands of the criminals.

I agree!

"it is easy to grow crazy"

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
52 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10228

bionic: 9870

at1with0: 9243

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 23915

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8654

Posts: 123262

Newest Members:

ieltstips22, Vicente Vargas, Goldingsboy, Bauer Palmer, Spacemonkey, hondahonda, laundryroom, kesan, Paul Thomas, Tony Lowe

Administrators: John Greenewald: 557, blackvault: 1776