So are we fighting or helping Al-Qaeda now? | General Discussion Topics | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
So are we fighting or helping Al-Qaeda now?
November 4, 2011
6:20 am
Avatar
gudskepteacal
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 620
Member Since:
June 5, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Some of you may have seen this already, but it seemed like an interesting topic to comment on...

Thanks To Obama, The Al-Qaeda Flag Is Now Flying High And Proud Over Libya
The Al-Qaeda flag has been flying high over Libya and the governments of the western world that helped remove Gaddafi from power don't seem to mind at all. The flag, which contains the phrase "there is no God but Allah" with a full moon underneath, has been photographed flying beside the new national flag of Libya at the courthouse in Benghazi. The courthouse in Benghazi is where the "rebels" established their provisional government, and it is where the "media center" for communication with foreign journalists was located during the fight against Gaddafi. So it isn't as if the al-Qaeda flag has been flying over some insignificant building. But this should be no surprise. It has been known all along that al-Qaeda was very heavily represented in the army of "the rebels" and among the leadership of "the rebels". Now, thanks to Obama, they have taken over Libya and they intend to impose a brutal form of Sharia law on the entire Libyan population.

You can see more pictures of the al-Qaeda flag flying over Libya on the website of the Telegraph and on the website of the Daily Mail.

The following is video of the al-Qaeda flag flying over the courthouse in Benghazi....

So where is the uproar about this in the U.S. media?

The silence has been deafening.

I guess it would be hard to explain to the American people why they should be sacrificing their sons and daughters to fight al-Qaeda when we just spent billions of dollars helping them take over Libya.

Sadly, the flag of al-Qaeda is not just being flown at the Benghazi courthouse. According to eyewitnesses, it is now being displayed all over Benghazi. The following is an account from an eyewitness that has seen the flag flying over the Benghazi courthouse for himself....

It was here at the courthouse in Benghazi where the first spark of the Libyan revolution ignited. It’s the symbolic seat of the revolution; post-Gaddafi Libya’s equivalent of Egypt’s Tahrir Square. And it was here, in the tumultuous months of civil war, that the ragtag rebel forces established their provisional government and primitive, yet effective, media center from which to tell foreign journalists about their “fight for freedom.”

But according to multiple eyewitnesses—myself included—one can now see both the Libyan rebel flag and the flag of al Qaeda fluttering atop Benghazi’s courthouse.

According to one Benghazi resident, Islamists driving brand-new SUVs and waving the black al Qaeda flag drive the city’s streets at night shouting, "Islamiya, Islamiya! No East, nor West," a reference to previous worries that the country would be bifurcated between Gaddafi opponents in the east and the pro-Gaddafi elements in the west.
So what in the world are we supposed to think about all this?

We were told that we had to invade Afghanistan because they were harboring "al-Qaeda" leaders.

We were told that it was necessary for us to stay in Iraq for so long so that "al-Qaeda" would not take over.

But now we have helped al-Qaeda take over Libya.

It isn't as if the governments of the western world did not know what was going on in Libya.

According to the Telegraph, the leader of the Libyan rebels was very open about the fact that his "troops" included significant numbers of al-Qaeda fighters that were firing bullets at U.S. soldiers in Iraq....

Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, the Libyan rebel leader, has said jihadists who fought against allied troops in Iraq are on the front lines of the battle against Muammar Gaddafi's regime.
According to a recent article by Kurt Nimmo for Infowars.com, al-Qaeda rebels had established an "Islamic emirate" in eastern Libya as early as February....

In February, it was reported that al-Qaeda had set-up an Islamic emirate in Derna, in eastern Libya, headed by a former prisoner at Guantanamo Bay, Abdelkarim al-Hasadi.
Now that they have won the war, the "rebels" have announced that they will be imposing strict Sharia law all over Libya.

The head of the National Transitional Council in Libya, Moustafa Abdeljalil, has already made this very clear. Just consider the following statements....

-"Sharia law is the source of all our laws."

-"We take the Islamic religion as the core of our new government"

-"The constitution will be based on our Islamic religion"

Shouldn't the people of Libya have a say in all of this?

Sadly, one kind of tyranny has just been replaced with another.

In fact, some elements of Sharia law have already been implemented.

According to a recent article posted on the Telegraph, Mustafa Abdul-Jalil has already announced that the law banning polygamy has been repealed because it is not compliant with Sharia law....

Mr Abdul-Jalil went further, specifically lifting immediately, by decree, one law from Col. Gaddafi's era that he said was in conflict with Sharia - that banning polygamy.
The American people were told that the system of government established by the Taliban in Afghanistan was so repressive that it needed to be overthrown, but now we are helping essentially the exact same system of government be set up in Libya.

It makes no sense whatsoever.

Not only that, we have greatly destabilized the region and there will almost certainly be very bloody internal conflicts within Libya for many years to come.

The following comes from a recent report posted by The New American....

Gadhafi and the remnants of his regime are thought to have distributed vast stockpiles of weapons and wealth so anti-revolutionary forces could wage what the despot promised would be a long-lasting insurgency. Many of those fighters fled to the desert and are staging surprise attacks on roaming bands of militiamen.

The ongoing battles have sparked widespread speculation that the bloody conflicts will continue to rage far into the future.
In addition, as The New American notes, as a result of this conflict huge amounts of very dangerous weapons have fallen into the hands of potential terrorists....

Advanced weaponry including anti-aircraft missiles has also fallen into the hands of known terrorist organizations. The deadly stockpiles are turning up all over the region, but it remains unclear how much firepower has been smuggled out of the country so far.
But does the Obama administration seem alarmed by any of this?

No, they just want us all to praise them for a "job well done" in Libya.

Hopefully the American people will see right through this nonsense.

The flag of al-Qaeda has been flying over the headquarters of the provisional government in Libya, and yet the American people are the ones that are being treated as potential terrorists.

Our borders are wide open and anyone that wants to can sneak into this country, and yet we are told that we must have our private parts examined before we are allowed to get on to an airplane.

Something is very, very wrong. Somehow the focus of national security has gone from protecting the American people to spying on the American people.

As I wrote about yesterday, the government has become absolutely obsessed with watching us, listening to us, tracking us, recording us, compiling information on all of us and getting us all to spy on one another.

Meanwhile, the U.S. government has been spending billions of dollars to help al-Qaeda take power in Libya and is helping them enslave the entire Libyan population to a brutal form of Sharia law.

Can anyone explain how this makes any sense at all?

http://endoftheamericandream.com/archiv ... over-libya

"History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance." - James Madison

November 4, 2011
6:36 am
Avatar
Guest
Guests

I keep telling some of you that there are Ishmaelites firmly entrenched in our own government here in the States. No doubt they are firmly entrenched in the government in the UK. Lot of Ishmaelites.

So many of our politicians are not the product advertised and many of them are Ishmaelites and following Ishmaelite doctrines, practices, and religion.
Therefore no surprise as to what has happened in Libya and that our government helped to sponsor them.

Thanks,
Orangetom

November 4, 2011
12:09 pm
Avatar
Cole_Trickle
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2730
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Can anyone explain how this makes any sense at all?

Sure--------------it's called Propaganda. As for the spying, nothing new they've been doing it for decades now, their tools have just become a bit more polished.

According to who exactly.. Laugh

Al_K_DUH only exists in the minds of the extremely gullible.........I call it " VIDEO GAME CULTURE ".............

I've always known that patience is a virtue of damn few people, now obviously one can add wisdom into the mix.

Cole

November 4, 2011
8:37 pm
Avatar
gudskepteacal
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 620
Member Since:
June 5, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I don't buy it Cole; to say that Al-Qaeda is just a figment of everybody's imagination is to say that the 100's of intelligence agencies and the 1000's of people who work for those agencies are all just full of it and actively involved in what has to be the biggest deception of all time. Like your 9/11 ct, just too many moving parts, too many loose ends. Even a know-nothing like myself can see that the Al-Qaeda flag is, in fact, real; whether it's just a 'ghost symbol' designed to perpetuate a tool to keep the masses in fear is something that I cannot agree with.

"History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance." - James Madison

November 11, 2011
1:06 am
Avatar
katsung47
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 834
Member Since:
February 23, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

So what. Al Qaeda is US puppet tool War on Libya is same like war on Iraq to control oil resource. The flag of Al Qaeda in Libya means one of US' agent joined the war and becomes a ruling force. It's that simple.

November 11, 2011
5:31 am
Avatar
gudskepteacal
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 620
Member Since:
June 5, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Maybe it is all about that lucrative, natural resource-black gold. Just covered by the false pretenses of an 'Arab spring' and the next sensationalized event to occur in the Middle East.

"History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance." - James Madison

November 11, 2011
9:13 am
Avatar
bionic
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9870
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I am very worried (in a selfish way) that we are, innadvertatnly, helping a huge Ismamic fundi culture to be created over yonder.
hope I am wrong.
as a female it terrifies me, to be honest

Willie Wonka quotes..
What is this Wonka, some kind of funhouse?
Why? Are you having fun?
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men.
We are the music makers, we are the dreamers of dreams

November 25, 2011
1:48 am
Avatar
katsung47
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 834
Member Since:
February 23, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Bin Laden is a living plant.

In 1990, Soviet bloc collapsed. US intelligence turned its resource which used to deal with Soviet bloc to the new target - Mid-east countries which are rich in natural resource. Bin Laden, an asset of the CIA in Afghanistan war(against Russian), was revived in this new project as a false flag - Islamic extremist. He went to Sudan first in 1991.

The Sudanese offered to arrest Bin Laden and extradite him to Saudi Arabia .

http://www.infowars.com/saved%20pages/P ... _laden.htm

Saudi and US didn't take the offer with various excuse because Bin Laden is a living plant they deployed there.

In 1995, Bin Laden tried to set up a connection with Saddam but was refused.

Exhaustive review finds no link between Saddam, al Qaida

A September 2006 report by the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that Saddam was "distrustful of al Qaida and viewed Islamic extremists as a threat to his regime, refusing all requests from al Qaida to provide material or operational support."

The Senate report, citing an FBI debriefing of a senior Iraqi spy, Faruq Hijazi , said that Saddam turned down a request for assistance by bin Laden which he made at a 1995 meeting in Sudan with an Iraqi operative.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20080 ... hy/2875005

Sudan may have felt the danger to accomodate Bin Laden. In May 1996, the Sudanese asked bin Laden to leave. He went to Afghan and stay there until now.

In August 1998, Sudan and Afghanistan were bombed by US missiles.

In 2001, after 911, Afghan, facing US invasion, made an offer but failed.

Bush rejects Taliban offer to hand Bin Laden over
* Taliban demand evidence of Bin Laden's guilt

guardian.co.uk, Sunday 14 October 2001 22.19 BST

http://www.politic.co.uk/18142.....osama.html

In Bin Laden's recent 20 years, the countries he went or tried to go, have something in common: They all have rich natural resources. Sudan and Iraq have oil. Afghan has rich mine. '

Afghanistan to develop $3 trillion in mining potential
DUBAI | Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:14pm
http://www.reuters.com/article.....JP20101025

He didn't go to Yemen, Somali or Syria for his "revolution" because they are resource poor countries, not in US interest list. He didn't go to Saudi or Kuwait. Because they are US allies. He only went to Sudan, Afghan, or Iraq (intended to) because these three countries were not controlled by US at that time. As a living plant, he gave US the excuse to activate attack on these three countries. (Even Saddam realized that Bin Laden was a dangerous living plant and rejected him, Iraq at last was invaded with an unexisted WMD)

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
40 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10232

bionic: 9870

at1with0: 9243

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 24017

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8692

Posts: 123383

Newest Members:

promoocodes, kelvin nebs, Joanna, Melanie, chetney sessoms, Horatius, PaulDee094, Gary Wayne Ponder, AuthenticDocuments, matic mogan

Administrators: John Greenewald: 570, blackvault: 1776