Private rocket failure | General Discussion Topics | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Private rocket failure
September 3, 2011
3:47 am
Avatar
greeney2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 10166
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Another failure of a private venture for space vehicles again and again, shows why manned flight programs are so complex, expensive, with every step critical. Every pound of payload is a major undertaking. Every minor detail can result in failure. It took 50 years of knowledge, mission data from prior flights, proceedures developed over very conserative methods. Space X intends to fly to the space station in October, but I can not see how NASA will allow anyone with no experience or history of manned flight, docking, etc. to go even close to the International Space Station.

Secretive Private Spaceship Builder Reports Rocket Failure
By Leonard David, SPACE.com’s Space Insider Columnist
Space.com | SPACE.com – 2 hrs 28 mins agotweet7Share0EmailPrintBlue Origin, the private entrepreneurial space group backed by Amazon.com mogul Jeff Bezos, has reported a failure in its suborbital rocket development plans.

"Three months ago, we successfully flew our second test vehicle in a short hop mission, and then last week we lost the vehicle during a developmental test at Mach 1.2 and an altitude of 45,000 feet," Bezos wrote in a statement posted to the Blue Origin website today (Sept. 2).

According to Bezos, a "flight instability" drove an angle of attack that triggered the Blue Origin range safety team to terminate thrust on the vehicle. The vehicle roared skyward from the Blue Origin spaceport, located roughly 25 miles (40 kilometers) north of tiny Van Horn, Texas, before the failure. [Photos]

"Not the outcome any of us wanted, but we're signed up for this to be hard, and the Blue Origin team is doing an outstanding job. We're already working on our next development vehicle," Bezos reported.

The tight-lipped Blue Origin space company has been focused on suborbital spaceflight, first using its Goddard vehicle and then migrating to the New Shepard spacecraft design at its facility in Culberson County, Texas. New Shepard is seen by the company as supporting the commercial suborbital tourist market. The Goddard vehicle flew a on a short, successful test flight in November 2006.

In April 2011, NASA awarded Blue Origin $22 million in funding under the space agency's Commercial Crew Development (CCDev) program for development of concepts and technologies to support future human spaceflight operations. That award followed $3.7 million in funding the company received in 2010 to develop an astronaut escape system and space capsule for ground tests.

NASA retired its space shuttle fleet in July and plans to rely on U.S. commercial spacecraft like those being developed by Blue Origin and other private space companies to transport American astronauts to low-Earth orbit.

While the test vehicle that failed last week was a suborbital vehicle, Blue Origin is also developing an orbital space capsule designed initially to launch on an expendable Atlas 5 rocket, then transition to a reusable booster being developed by the company.

"In case you’re curious and wondering 'where is the crew capsule,' the development vehicle doesn't have a crew capsule … just a close-out fairing instead," Bezos added in a postscript to his website update. "We're working on the sub-orbital crew capsule separately, as well as an orbital crew vehicle to support NASA’s Commercial Crew program."

Apparently undaunted by the rocket failure, Bezos ended his report with: "Gradatim Ferociter!"

That's Latin for "Step-by-Step, Ferociously."

Leonard David has been reporting on the space industry for more than five decades. He is a winner of this year's National Space Club Press Award and a past editor-in-chief of the National Space Society's Ad Astra and Space World magazines. He has written for SPACE.com since 1999.

Vote Now! The Best Spaceships of All Time
Top 10 Fantasy Spaceships Headed for Reality

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
22 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10166

bionic: 9870

at1with0: 9243

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 23668

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 32

Topics: 8548

Posts: 122754

Newest Members:

Henweielts, Athena, Athena, Athena, ocodevohu, yxufuguj, Sue Scott, prophetofjustice, MrAnimal, joe jimmy

Administrators: John Greenewald: 518, blackvault: 1777