Carney: Boston Bomber Will Not Be Charged As Enemy Combatant | General Discussion Topics | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Carney: Boston Bomber Will Not Be Charged As Enemy Combatant
April 22, 2013
7:29 pm
Avatar
blackvault
Admin
Forum Posts: 1777
Member Since:
August 26, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

"JAY CARNEY" wrote: He will not be treated as an enemy combatant. We will prosecute this terrorist through our civilian system of justice. Under U.S. law, United States citizens cannot be tried in military commissions. And it is important to remember that since 9/11 we have used the federal court system to convict and incarcerate hundreds of terrorists. The effective use of the criminal justice system has resulted in the interrogation, conviction and detention of both U.S. citizens and non-citizens for acts of terrorism committed inside the United States and around the world.

The system has repeatedly proven that it can successfully handle the threat we continue to face. There are a number of examples of this, high profile examples: The Times Square Bomber Faisal Shahzad pled guilty and was sentenced to life in prison. Abdul Muttalib, the so-called underwear bomber, was sentenced to life in prison. Warsame, a Somalian national and member of al-Shabab and has close associations with al Qaeda in the Arabia Peninsula, is now currently in this system and we have acquired valuable intelligence from him through the process allowed in the system. So this is absolutely the right way to go and the appropriate way to go. When it comes to United States citizens, it is against the law to try them in military commissions.

-----
John Greenewald, Jr.
The Black Vault Website Owner / Operator
http://www.theblackvault.com

April 23, 2013
12:30 am
Avatar
Wing-Zero
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3278
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I'm sure this will anger a multitude of people, but the fact is that he is indeed an American Citizen, and our Constitution grants us inalienable rights that must be recognized whether the person in question has done good things or bad things.

War is an extension of economics and diplomacy through other means.

Economics and diplomacy are methods of securing resources used by humans.

Securing resources is the one necessary behavior for all living things.

War = Life

April 23, 2013
1:02 am
Avatar
Dragoness
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 118
Member Since:
January 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

This is one of the reasons I don't like to watch the minute by minute stuff and like to wait till things settle. I had heard they were over here illegally and not U.S. citizens. I swear the news today is all about being the first to report an item, and worry about the fact checking later.

April 23, 2013
1:28 am
Avatar
Wing-Zero
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3278
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

"Dragoness" wrote: This is one of the reasons I don't like to watch the minute by minute stuff and like to wait till things settle. I had heard they were over here illegally and not U.S. citizens. I swear the news today is all about being the first to report an item, and worry about the fact checking later.

Obviously. Look at the Connecticut shooting. First day they reported a man being found in the woods with tactical gear, two guns were found in the shooter's car, pistols were used and not an AR-15, and then they changed it when more info (or disinfo, whichever you believe) came out.

War is an extension of economics and diplomacy through other means.

Economics and diplomacy are methods of securing resources used by humans.

Securing resources is the one necessary behavior for all living things.

War = Life

April 23, 2013
1:41 am
Avatar
greeney2
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 10183
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Because the citizenship was given under the false pretense by him, I think they should be able to revoke it. Given only in Sept of 2012, it is obvious he was not being truthful when taking the oath of being a citizen, and therefore should be revocable.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online: Kieran
43 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10183

bionic: 9870

at1with0: 9243

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 23746

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 32

Topics: 8587

Posts: 122892

Newest Members:

Starcluster Starman, Poul Helman, assignment writers, nianaguerrero, Alfred Dutton, Kieran, garylee, Capt Montauk, TangoP, Julie Dang

Administrators: John Greenewald: 523, blackvault: 1777