April 9, 2009
Think everyone has herd all the debacle about the Los Angeles Clippers, and the racial statement from Donald Sterling the owner. This is going to be very interesting all the legal battles that are about to happen. First the woman who taped him, she has to be out of a legal limb, from one standpoint she might have illegally taped him, and may have been extorting him for money. The estranged wife Mrs. Sterling was suing her for the "gifts" that totaled about $2.5M, including Bentleys, a Ferrari, and a Condo. The woman, who we all have seen wearing a face shield, may also be in trouble if these gifts were not claimed as income. So you could add income tax evasion to possible extortion, blackmail, and just illegally taping him which is a crime.
Now the NBA as banned Sterling for life, and taken over the team, however his wife is also a 50% owner, and had nothing to do with what statements he made. How can they also punish her? or can they both be equally punished because it is a co-ownership and each responsible for the others blunders? Complicated by divorce papers in the process, it will be a legal mess from about 6 different issues.
Personally I wonder what powers the NBA has to take away a team or force the sale, without some "due process", or hearing, where Sterling can defend himself? Secondly, the contracts wording about rights of spouses who are co-owners. A wife is not responsible for the crimes of her spouse, and visa versa, and this is not even a crime. The results to the Sterlings, may have been from the woman perpetrating a crime against them--extortion? In that sense they are victims, even in the face of such vile statements.
The other issue is going to be issues of freedom of speech, as despicable as his comments were, and in the privacy of his own home, behind closed doors, as despicable as it was, raises the question of invasion of privacy. A lot of rights, and a lot of ethics involved, and a lot of marital responsibility in a state (California), where property is jointly owned between husband and wife. Do agreements with entities like the NBA or NFL, take away some of these rights granted by state laws, and can they prevail forcing both of them to sell a team they own? This is when civil laws can get very complicated, and can a contract require you to relinquish such rights? Seems like this is a unconstitutional issue within the NBA franchise agreement. Going to get very sticky in court.
What do you think?
April 9, 2009
In my opinion this is theft. So who and how? Simple just take a look at who is behind the forced sale, then look at the legal aspects.....who will be named a judge? These things are what the average American has been brainwashed to accept. Who cares wtf he said, to who, when, where wtf ever..........that's not important...what is important is that THEY are openly stealing his business under the guise of being PC and actually caring about being more civilized...IT'S BS.
I'm certain he'll appeal until it reaches the point of no return and it will be shot down by a higher court or they will willfully violate the 1st amendment as well as other laws of the land.
April 9, 2009
His agreement with the NBA evidently has some stringent rules and they do have the power to force this sale. I is further complicated by the fact Sterling has been ruled incompetent and he gave power of attorney to his wife. Yesterday the ruling went in her favor giving her the power to sell the team. He has 10 days to appeal.
Most Users Ever Online: 288
Currently Browsing this Page:
Guest Posters: 2
Newest Members:Cassandra, Deirdre McMahon, ieltsindia, Von wahlde, lyon smith, Andrew Witmark, Charlie, JeffreyHollister, lora beth, DEFENCE SECTOR
Administrators: John Greenewald: 585, blackvault: 1776