April 9, 2009
Until last week, I had never heard of bump stocks. I looked them up and was surprised what I found. First I am surprised the US patent office granted a patent on them, as the patent went around the barn so to speak on it being some sort of trigger aid so handicapped people could target shoot. Would be rather ludicrous to think the US government would give a patent so anyone could convert a gun to a machine gun. (like that would surprise anyone)
I also found, and not sure if it was a matter of interpretation, they claimed each one came with a certificate from the ATF, it was legal. And as you can imagine, sales requests have gone off the map since last Sunday, but the company has taken them down. The video shows one being used rapid fire, and we all could hear the sounds from the real attack. Someone I talked to said, they really do not work as well as shown, but obvious, you can tweak them to work, with a little ability.
The NRA started out by saying this had to be looked at, now say they are against any ban on them.
I'm am a firm believer in the 2nd amendment, not a hunter, but love plinking at cans. The kid in me would love to fire one for fun, lets face it, every boy loves fireworks and firecrackers, and shooting guns, doesn't make you a nut. I'm real surprised tannerite is legal to sell.
But on the serious side, is there some common ground about these bump stocks, and those who are on the far left side of gun control? Like the AR15, millions of people have them, and in statistics are not used with the frequency of any number of other guns in crimes. The old argument a parked corvette never killed anyone, and we can't even stop drunk driving. Are we going to make every gun owner pay for this, what about those millions of responsible gun owners and millions own just a many guns when they are collectors. You could list any number of hunting rifles, that could do the same thing, they just do not look like a military weapon. We think about race cars on the street, but truth is the top 10 death rate cars include common everyday SUV's and some pickups, so it is not always the ones that have a certain look to them, that kill.
What is your opinion, personally I would not buy a bump stock, and do not think an accessory for any gun that is banned affects the 2nd amendment. What is the cost of defending any and all attempts to ban things. Some want the 2nd amendment abolished. What is the answer, this man passed all criteria to buy, had no mental or criminal record.
April 9, 2009
I don't know much about big guns. I like .22s. On the news they interviewed a woman at a gun shop. She said they don't carry them. They're really expensive and the ammo is more expensive too. So, there just isn't much demand for them. I've also heard that they ruin your accuracy.
Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen... - Zbigniew Brezhinsky
Most Users Ever Online: 288
Currently Browsing this Page:
Guest Posters: 2
Newest Members:alice paul, Michael Jay, Heidi_Steindel, ajumovel, Paul, Fabio_Sartori, iboru, azyselyji, Scott P., Helena_Matias
Administrators: John Greenewald: 415, blackvault: 1777