Administration halts prosecution of alleged USS Cole bomber | General Discussion Topics | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Administration halts prosecution of alleged USS Cole bomber
August 27, 2010
7:17 pm
Avatar
blackvault
Admin
Forum Posts: 1776
Member Since:
August 26, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

By Peter Finn

The Obama administration has shelved the planned prosecution of Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, the alleged coordinator of the Oct. 2000 suicide attack on the USS Cole in Yemen, according to a court filing.

The decision at least temporarily scuttles what was supposed to be the signature trial of a major al-Qaeda figure under a reformed system of military commissions. And it comes practically on the eve of the 10th anniversary of the attack, which killed 17 sailors and wounded dozens when a boat packed with explosives ripped a hole in the side of the warship in the port of Aden.

In a filing this week in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, the Justice Department said that "no charges are either pending or contemplated with respect to al-Nashiri in the near future."

The statement, tucked into a motion to dismiss a petition by Nashiri's attorneys, suggests that the prospect of further military trials for detainees held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, has all but ground to a halt, much as the administration's plan to try the accused plotters of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in federal court has stalled.

Only two cases are moving forward at Guantanamo Bay, and both were sworn and referred for trial by the time Obama took office. In January 2009, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates directed the Convening Authority for Military Commissions to stop referring cases for trial, an order that 20 months later has not been rescinded.

Military officials said a team of prosecutors in the Nashiri case has been ready go to trial for some time. And several months ago, military officials seemed confident that Nashiri would be arraigned this summer.

"It's politics at this point," said one military official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss policy. He said he thinks the administration does not want to proceed against a high-value detainee without some prospect of civilian trials for other major figures at Guantanamo Bay.

A White House official disputed that.

"We are confident that the reformed military commissions are a lawful, fair and effective prosecutorial forum and that the Department of Defense will handle the referrals in an appropriate manner consistent with the interests of justice," said the official, who also spoke on the condition of anonymity.

The Defense Department issued a statement Thursday saying the case is not stalled. "Prosecutors in the Office of Military Commissions are actively investigating the case against Mr. al-Nashiri and are developing charges against him," the statement said.

With the 10th anniversary of the Cole bombing approaching on Oct. 12, relatives of those killed in the attack expressed deep frustration with the delay.

"After 10 years, it seems like nobody really cares," said Gloria Clodfelter, whose 21-year-old son, Kenneth, was killed on the Cole.

Military prosecutors allege that Nashiri, a Saudi national, was a senior al-Qaeda operative and close associate of Osama bin Laden, who orchestrated the suicide attack on the Cole. Nashiri was scheduled to be arraigned in February 2009 but the new administration instructed military prosecutors to suspend legal proceedings at Guantanamo Bay. The charges against Nashiri were withdrawn.

In November 2009, however, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. appeared to revive the case when he announced that the military would prosecute Nashiri, one of at least 36 detainees who could be tired in federal court or a military commission.

"With regard to the Cole bombing, that was an attack on a United States warship, and that, I think, is appropriately placed into the military commission setting," Holder said.

But critics of military commissions say the Nashiri case exemplifies the system's flaws, particularly the ability to introduce certain evidence such as hearsay statements that probably would not be admitted in federal court. The prosecution is expected to rely heavily on statements made to the FBI by two Yemenis who allegedly implicated Nashiri. Neither witness is expected at trial, but the FBI agents who interviewed them will testify, said Nashiri's military attorney, Navy Lt. Cmdr. Stephen C. Reyes. "Unlike in federal court, you don't have the right to confront the witnesses against you," he said.

Such indirect testimony could be critical to a conviction because any incriminating statements Nashiri might have made are probably inadmissible under the 2009 Military Commissions Act, which bars the use of evidence obtained through torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.

Nashiri, 45, was captured in the United Arab Emirates in November 2002, and immediately placed in CIA custody. He was among three detainees held by the agency who was water-boarded, and a report by the CIA's inspector general found that Nashiri was threatened with a gun and a power drill.

"I am very confident, based upon what I have heard, that there is more than sufficient evidence linking him to the attack on Cole directly, and that they do not need any of the information that may have come from black site interviews and interrogations," said Kirk S. Lippold, who was commander of the Cole when it was attacked.

Reyes said Nashiri's treatment at the hands of the CIA will be part of any proceeding and will be relevant to any sentence he receives if he is found guilty. The government is expected to seek the death penalty.

"I'm not admitting to guilty, but his treatment is absolutely relevant in a death case and can be used in mitigation to lessen the sentence," Reyes said.

Nashiri, who has been held at Camp 7 at Guantanamo Bay since September 2006, has never appeared in court. But according to the transcript of a 2007 Combatant Status Review Tribunal, he said that he had nothing to do with the Cole bombing and that his connections to those involved in the explosion, including the purchase of the suicide boat, were unwitting. "We were planning to be involved in a fishing project," he said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 0082700364

-----
John Greenewald, Jr.
The Black Vault Website Owner / Operator
http://www.theblackvault.com

August 27, 2010
7:48 pm
Avatar
BloodStone
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1401
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

And they wonder why people think he's a muslim ? 🙄

They have no problem going after Sherriff Joe, or Arizona, but the muslim terrorists eh , their ok , we can let them slide.

BloodStone...

If it were raining hookers, I'd get hit by a fag.

August 27, 2010
10:08 pm
Avatar
Cole_Trickle
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2730
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Is it even remotely possible that this guy had nothing to do with bombing the Cole? Or is he ( without doubt ) the guy?

Maybe he was " WATER BOARDED " into being the guy!

Bring Em Home Cole

August 27, 2010
10:10 pm
Avatar
frrostedman
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3815
Member Since:
September 4, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It is remotely possible, but, shouldn't it at least go to a Tribunal or Court? I guess not.

Every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe-a spirit vastly superior to that of man. - Albert Einstein

August 27, 2010
10:17 pm
Avatar
Cole_Trickle
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2730
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

On what grounds, what evidence does anyone have? Can you please produce a document or witness statement that will verify this person involvement other than a CIA induced torture that produced said probable cause?

Seriously interested!

Bring Em All Home Cole

August 27, 2010
10:43 pm
Avatar
frrostedman
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3815
Member Since:
September 4, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

So in order for there to be enough suspicion to warrant an investigation, the incident has to be documented or witnessed by a neutral party?

Can you produce a document that proves the only reason the man confessed to the bombing was because he was tortured into saying it?

If not, then his admission of guilt should be enough to warrant a simple investigation. What's the harm in an investigation? Whose rights are violated if someone just investigates a crime?

I don't know why I'm wasting my time. It's not like any of this common sense stuff is going to get through.

Every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe-a spirit vastly superior to that of man. - Albert Einstein

August 27, 2010
10:47 pm
Avatar
BloodStone
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1401
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

😀 Gets mind numbing hey Frrosted.... 😀

BloodStone...

If it were raining hookers, I'd get hit by a fag.

August 27, 2010
10:52 pm
Avatar
frrostedman
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3815
Member Since:
September 4, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Can you believe these progressives? Now according to them, you have to have smoking gun evidence before you can even INVESTIGATE a crime.

It just doesn't make a lot of sense, does it. 😐

Every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe-a spirit vastly superior to that of man. - Albert Einstein

August 27, 2010
10:53 pm
Avatar
Cole_Trickle
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2730
Member Since:
April 9, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Dude for the very last f,ing time---your stance is one of " ANSWERING QUESTIONS WITH MORE QUESTIONS " HELLO___If this Clown had anything to do with the Cole incident he'd more than likely have been tried years and years ago---but he wasn't--WHY THE HELL NOT????????????

What, Bush couldn't shit or get off the pot! Come on man--you are pissing up a freaking rope, It's embarrassing, especially since you claim to be so knowledgeable about all things politics.

Bring Em All Home Cole

August 28, 2010
4:57 am
Avatar
frrostedman
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3815
Member Since:
September 4, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

"Cole_Trickle" wrote: It's embarrassing, especially since you claim to be so knowledgeable about all things politics.

Nope. Never said that.

Every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe-a spirit vastly superior to that of man. - Albert Einstein

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online:
69 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10245

bionic: 9870

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Tairaa: 2842

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 24223

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 31

Topics: 8753

Posts: 123585

Newest Members:

[email protected], Aaron Breuer, Kjel, Nashima Amed, Kyle, White Buffalo, Swampfox61, Leo jensen, clive twist, John Smith

Administrators: John Greenewald: 590, blackvault: 1776