Navy blunders in FOIA Response. | Freedom of Information Act | Forum

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Navy blunders in FOIA Response.
January 8, 2014
5:32 am
Avatar
magonia17
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 190
Member Since:
December 2, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

"A US Navy official mistakenly forwarded an email to a local news reporter this week outlining the Navy’s method of avoiding the very Freedom of Information Act requests that reporter had filed.

The Navy’s FOIA office confirmed that it had received MacFarlane’s request, but instead of sending him the relevant documents, they inadvertently sent an internal email containing instructions on how to avoid the reporter’s request. MacFarlane tweeted a screenshot of the message – which included the name of Robin Patterson, the Navy’s FOIA public liaison – accompanied by the phrase “EPIC FAILURE.”

“I think the appropriate response is ‘cameras are prohibited from the premises, with the exception of ‘official photos’ of specific events and assemblies, or ceremonies, such as retirements,” the email read, in part. “This request is too broad to tie to the specific event. If you discover that there is a ‘photo library,’ I would recommend negotiating with the requester…”

MacFarlane also asked the Navy to waive fees beyond $15 because his request “is in the public interest….A compelling need exists to warrant expedited processing of this request, because a large number of our viewers are immediately impacted by the content of these records. There records relate directly to performance of government in matters of safety, health, and well-being.”

FOIA workers advised each other to avoid turning over information by telling MacFarlane his request was too broad and would constitute a “fishing expedition,” and that he should “narrow the scope of his request.”

“Again, another ‘fishing expedition,’” the screenshot shows. “[J]ust because they are media doesn’t mean the memos shed light on specific government activities.”

http://rt.com/usa/navy-foia-reporter-accident-294/

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 288

Currently Online: John Greenewald
29 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

greeney2: 10153

bionic: 9870

at1with0: 9243

Lashmar: 5289

tigger: 4576

rath: 4297

DIss0n80r: 4161

sandra: 3858

frrostedman: 3815

Wing-Zero: 3278

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 23407

Moderators: 0

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 8

Forums: 32

Topics: 8416

Posts: 121480

Newest Members:

nbdy, Mark, Valarie Meadows, Victor Lafortune, Mario, Jason Boyle, David, Paula Foltz, DebbyeThompson, Debbye, Michigan

Administrators: John Greenewald: 481, blackvault: 1777